The effects of fuel type on control rod reactivity of pebble-bed reactor

Zuhair; Suwoto; Setiadipura, Topan; Kuijper, Jim C.

doi:10.2478/nuka-2019-0017

Abstract

As a crucial core physics parameter, the control rod reactivity has to be predicted for the control and safety of the reactor. This paper studies the control rod reactivity calculation of the pebble-bed reactor with three scenarios of UO₂, (Th,U)O_2, and PuO₂ fuel type without any modifications in the configuration of the reactor core. The reactor geometry of HTR-10 was selected for the reactor model. The entire calculation of control rod reactivity was done using the MCNP6 code with ENDF/B-VII library. The calculation results show that the total reactivity worth of control rods in UO₂-, (U,Th)O₂-_, and PuO₂-fueled cores is 15.87, 15.25, and 14.33%Δk/k, respectively. These results prove that the effectiveness of total control rod in thorium and uranium cores is almost similar to but higher than that in plutonium cores. The highest reactivity worth of individual control rod in uranium, thorium and plutonium cores is 1.64, 1.44, and 1.53%Δk/k corresponding to CR8, CR1, and CR5, respectively. The other results demonstrate that the reactor can be safely shutdown with the control rods combination of CR3+CR5+CR8+CR10, CR2+CR3+CR7+CR8, and CR1+CR3+CR6+CR8 in UO₂-, (U,Th)O₂-_, and PuO₂-fueled cores, respectively. It can be concluded that, even though the calculation results are not so much different, however, the selection of control rods should be considered in the pebble-bed core design with different scenarios of fuel type.

References

1. International Energy Agency. (2008). Energy technology prospectives: Scenario 7 strategies to 2050. Technical report. OECD/IEA, France.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Generation IV International Forum (GIF). (2014). Technology Roadmap Update for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Frima, L. L. W. (2013). Burnup in a molten salt fast reactor. Master Thesis. Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology. Available from https://d1rkab7tlqy5f1.cloudfront.net/TNW/Afdelingen/Radiation%20Science%20and%20Technology/Research%20Groups/RPNM/Publications/MSc_Lodewijk_Frima.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Graafland, C. (2014). Modeling and analysis of a depressurized loss of forced cooling event in a thorium fueled high temperature reactor. Bachelor Thesis. Department Radiation Science & Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology. Available from https://d1rkab7tlqy5f1.cloudfront.net/TNW/Afdelingen/Radiation%20Science%20and%20Technology/Research%20Groups/RPNM/Publications/BSc_Chris_Graafland.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Burns, J. R. (2015). Reactivity control of a PWR 19×19 uranium silicide fuel assembly. M. Sc. Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology. Available from https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/53975/BURNS-THESIS-2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Liu, S., Li, Z., Wang, K., Cheng, Q., & She, D. (2018). Random geometry capability in RMC code for explicit analysis of polytype particle/pebble and applications to HTR-10 benchmark. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 111, 41–49.10.1016/j.anucene.2017.08.063
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Goorley, J. T., James, M. R., Booth, T. E., Brown, F. B., Bull, J. S., Cox, L. J., Durkee, J. W. Jr., Elson, J. S., Fensin, M. L., Forster, R., A. III, Hendricks, J. S., Hughes, H. G. III, Joghns, R. C., Kiedrowski, B. C., Martz, R. L., Mashnik, S. G., McKinney, G. W., Pelowitz, D. B., Prael, R. E., Sweezy, J. E., Waters, L. S., Wilcox, T., & Zukaitis, A. J. (2013). Initial MCNP6 release overview – MCNP6 version 1.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory. (LA-UR-13-22934). DOI: 10.2172/1086758. Available from https://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-13-22934.10.2172/1086758
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Chadwick, M. B., Obložinský, P., Herman, M., Greene, N., McKnight, R., Smith, D., Young, P., MacFarlane, R., Hale, G., Frankle, S., Kahler, A. C., Kawano, T., Little, R., Madland, D., Moller, P., Mosteller, R., Page, P., Talou, P., Trellue, H., & van der Marck, S. (2006). ENDF/B-VII: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology. Nucl. Data Sheets, 107(12), 2931–3060.10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2013). Evaluation of high temperature gas-cooled reactor performance: Benchmark analysis related to initial testing of the HTTR and HTR10. Vienna, Austria: IAEA. (IAEA-TECDOC-1382).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Halla-aho, L. (2014). Development of an HTR-10 model in the SERPENT Reactor Physics Code. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Setiadipura, T., Irwanto, D., & Zuhair. (2015). Preliminary neutronic design of high burnup OTTO cycle pebble bed reactor. Atom Indonesia, 41(1), 7–15.10.17146/aij.2015.350
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Hosseini, S. A., & Athari-Allaf, M. (2016). Effects of the wallpaper fuel design on the neutronic behavior of the HTR-10. Kerntechnik, 81(6), 627–633.10.3139/124.110564
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Zuhair., Suwoto., Setiadipura, T., & Su’ud, Z. (2017). The effects of applying silicon carbide coating on core reactivity of pebble-bed HTR in water ingress accident. Kerntechnik, 82(1), 92–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3139/124.110628.10.3139/124.110628
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Zuhair., Suwoto, S., & Supriatna, P. (2012). Studi model heksagonal MCNP5 dalam perhitungan benchmark fisika teras HTR-10. Jurnal Matematika dan Sains, 17(2), 61–70.10.26740/jpfa.v2n2.p1-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Zuhair., & Suwoto. (2015). Analisis efek kecelakaan water ingress terhadap reaktivitas doppler teras RGTT200K. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir TRI DASA MEGA, 17(1), 31–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2015.17.1.2238.10.17146/tdm.2015.17.1.2238
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Zuhair., Suwoto., & Yazid, P. I. (2013). Investigasi parameter bahan bakar pebble dalam perhitungan teras thorium RGTT200K. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Nuklir Indonesia, 14(2), 65–78.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Zuhair., Suwoto., Setiadipura, T., Bakhri, S., & Sunaryo, G. R. (2018). Study on characteristic of temperature coefficient of reactivity for plutonium core of pebbled bed reactor. J. Phys.-Conf. Series, 962(1), 012058.10.1088/1742-6596/962/1/012058
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Suwoto., Adrial, H., Hamzah, A., Zuhair., Bakhri, S., & Sunaryo, G. R. (2018). Neutron dose rate analysis on HTGR-10 reactor using Monte Carlo code. J. Phys.-Conf. Series, 962(1), 012029.10.1088/1742-6596/962/1/012029
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Lebenhalt, J. L. (2001). MCNP4B modeling of pebblebed reactors. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from https://web.mit.edu/pebble-bed/papers1_files/MCNP4B%20Modeling.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Rosales, J., Munoz, A., Garcia, C., Garcia, L., Brayner, C., Perez, J., & Abanades, A. (2014). Computational model for the neutronic simulation of pebble bed reactor’s core using MCNPX. Int. J. Nucl. Energy, 2014, article ID 279073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/279073.10.1155/2014/279073
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Zuhair., Suwoto., Yazid, P. I., & Pane, J. S. (2016). Studi model benchmark MCNP6 dalam perhitungan reaktivitas batang kendali HTR-10. GANENDRA Majalah IPTEK Nuklir, 19(2), 95–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.17146/gnd.2016.19.2.2880.10.17146/gnd.2016.19.2.2880
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Hosking, G., & Newton, T. D. (2005). Proposed benchmark specification for an HTR fuelled with reactor grade plutonium. Nuclear Energy Agency, Nuclear Science Committee. (NEW/NSC/DOC(2003)22).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The effects of fuel type on control rod reactivity of pebble-bed reactor

Abstract

Paradigm

My account