Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Calculated neutron energy dependence of the dose-response of large recombination chamber Cover

Calculated neutron energy dependence of the dose-response of large recombination chamber

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. 1. Zielczyński, M., Golnik, N., & Rusinowski, Z. (1996). A computer controlled ambient dose equivalent meter based on a recombination chamber. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc. Equ., 370(2/3), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)01013-0.10.1016/0168-9002(95)01013-0
  2. 2. Zielczyński, M., & Golnik, N. (1994). Recombination index of radiation quality – measuring and applications. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 52, 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082226.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082226
  3. 3. Golnik, N., Gryziński, M. A., Kowalska, M., Meronka, K., & Tulik, P. (2014). Characterization of radiation field for irradiation of biological samples at nuclear reactor – comparison of twin detector and recombination methods. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 161(1/4), 196–200. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct341.10.1093/rpd/nct34124366246
  4. 4. Golnik, N. (1996). Recombination methods in the dosimetry of mixed radiation. Swierk, Poland: Institute of Atomic Energy. (Report IEA-20/A).
  5. 5. Golnik, N., Silari, M., & Otto, T. (1999). On the use of a recombination chamber for radiation measurements in CERN-EU high-energy reference radiation fields. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 86(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032940.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032940
  6. 6. Silari, M., Agosteo, S., Beck, P., Bedogni, R., Cale, E., Caresana, M., Domingo, C., Donadille, L., Dubourg, N., Esposito, A., Fehrenbacher, G., Fernandez, F., Ferrarini, M., Fiechtner, A., Fuchs, A., Garcia, M. J., Golnik, N., Gutermuth, F., Khurana, S., Klages, Th., Latocha, M., Mares, V., Mayer, S., Radon, T., Reithmeier, H., Rollet, S., Roos, H., Ruhm, W., Sandri, S., Schardt, D., Simmer, G., Spurny, F., Trompier, F., Villa-Grassa, C., Weitzenegger, E., Wiegel, B., Wielunski, M., Wissmann, F., Zechner, A., & Zielczyński, M. (2009). Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response. Radiat. Meas., 44(7/8), 673–691. DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005.10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005
  7. 7. Golnik, N., Brede, H. J., & Guldbakke, S. (1997). H*(10) response of the REM-2 recombination chamber in monoenergetic neutron fields. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 74(3), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032189.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032189
  8. 8. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1983). Microdosimetry. ICRU Publications. Bethesda. (ICRU Report 36).
  9. 9. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1993). Quantities and units in radiation protection dosimetry. ICRU Publications. Bethesda. (ICRU Report 51).
  10. 10. Leuthold, G., Mares, V., & Schraube, H. (1992). Calculation of the neutron ambient dose equivalent on the basis of the ICRP revised quality factors. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 40(2), 77–84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2019-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1508-5791 | Journal ISSN: 0029-5922
Language: English
Page range: 117 - 121
Submitted on: Apr 13, 2015
|
Accepted on: Sep 16, 2019
|
Published on: Dec 11, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Katarzyna Tymińska, Michał A. Gryziński, Maciej Maciak, published by Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.