Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Ethical and Legal Responsibility of Multinational Corporate Groups for a Fair Share of Taxes

Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. Albert, Hans. Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
  2. Avi-Yonah, Reuven, “Between Formulary Apportionment and the OECD Guidelines: A Proposal for Reconciliation,” World Tax Journal 2, no. 1 (2010): 3–18.
  3. Avi-Yonah, Reuven, “Corporate Taxation and Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Law and Business, no. 11 (2014): 1–29.
  4. Avi-Yonah, Reuven, “Three Steps Forward, One Step Back? Reflections on ‘Google Taxes’ and the Destination-Based Corporate Tax,” Nordic Tax Journal, no. 2 (2016): 69–76.
  5. Avi-Yonah, Reuven, and Ilan Benshalom. “Formulary Apportionment: Myths and Prospects—Promoting Better International Policy and Utilizing the Misunderstood and Under-Theorized Formulary Alternative,” World Tax Journal 3 no. 3 (2011): 371–98.
  6. Belenzon, Sharon, Hongii Lee, and Andrea Patacconi, “Towards a Legal Theory of the Firm: The Effects of Enterprise Liability on Asset Partitioning, Decentralization and Corporate Group Growth,” NBER Working Paper No. w24720, 2018.
  7. Bird, Richard, “Are Global Taxes Feasible?” International Tax and Public Finance no. 5 (2018): 1372–1400.
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre. “Principles of an Economic Anthropology.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology 2nd ed., edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg, (2005): 75–89. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Bratman, Michael E. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  10. Bratman, Michael E. 2017. “The Intentions of a Group.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Eric W. Orts and N. Craig Smith, 36–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Brauner, Yariv. 2020. “Between Arm's Length and Formulary Apportionment.” In The Allocation of Multinational Business Income: Reassessing the Formulary Apportionment Option, edited by Rick Krever and François Vaillancourt, 209–38. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International B.V.
  12. Büttner, Tim, and Matthias Thielemann. “Breaking Regime Stability? The Politicization of Expertise in the OECD/G20 Process on BEPS and the Potential Transformation of International Taxation.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 7, no. 1 (2017): 757–82.
  13. Carroll, Archie B., “A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,” The Academy of Management Review 4, no. 4 (1979): 497–505.
  14. Carroll, Archie B., “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Shareholders,” Business Horizons 34, no. 4 (1991): 39–48.
  15. Christensen, Johan. The Power of Economists Within the State. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.
  16. Clarke, Thomas, Walter Jarvis, and Soheyla Gholamshahi. “The Impact of Corporate Governance on Compounding Inequality: Maximising Shareholder Value and Inflating.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, no. 63 (2019): 102049.
  17. Coleman, James S. 1994. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Economic Sociology.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg, 166–80. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Couzin, Robert. “Policy Forum: The End of Transfer Pricing?” Canadian Tax Journal 61, no. 1 (2013): 159–78.
  19. Cyert, Richard Michael, and James G. March. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd ed., Reprint, Digital Print. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Business, 2003.
  20. Dagger, Richard, and David Lefkowitz. 2014. “Political Obligation.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  21. Davis, Gerald, and Adam J. Cobb. 2010. “Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Stanford's Organization Theory Renaissance, 1970–2000. Vol. 28. edited by Claudia Bird Schoonhoven and Frank Dobbin, 21–42. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  22. De Wilde, Maarten Floris. “On the OECD’S ‘Unified Approach’ as Frankenstein's Monster and a Dented Shape Sorter,” Intertax 48, no. 1. (2020): 9–13.
  23. Eden, Lorraine, and Oliver Treidler. 2019. “INSIGHT: Taxing the Digital Economy-Pillar One Is Not BEPS 2 (Part 1).” Bloomberg Tax (November 8, 2019): 1–5.
  24. Eden, Lorraine, and Oliver Treidler. “INSIGHT: Taxing the Digital Economy-Pillar One Is Not BEPS 2 (Part 2).” Bloomberg Tax (November 12, 2019): 1–7.
  25. Endres, Dieter, and Christoph Spengel. International Company Taxation and Tax Planning. Aalphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International B.V., 2015.
  26. Fama, Eugene F. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88, no. 2 (1980): 288–307.
  27. Fligstein, Neil. “Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions.” American Sociological Review 61, no. 4 (1996): 656–73.
  28. Fligstein, Neil. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
  29. Fligstein, Neil, and Doug McAdam. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: University Press, 2012.
  30. Förster, Hartmut, Stefan Greil, and Arnim Hilse. 2020. “Taxing the Digital Economy - The OECD Secretariat's New Transfer Pricing A-B-C and Alternative Courses of Action.” International Transfer Pricing Journal 27 (1): 3–18.
  31. French, Peter A. 1979. “The Corporation as a Moral Person.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 207–15.
  32. French, Peter A. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
  33. French, Peter A. “The Diachronic Moral Responsibility of Firms.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Eric W. Orts and N. Craig Smith, 53–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Furubotn, Eirik G., and Rudolf Richter. 2005. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. 2nd ed., Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
  35. G20 Communique. 2021. “Italian G20 Presidency Third Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting Communiqué 9-10 July 2021.” https://www.g20.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Communique-Third-G20-FMCBG-meeting-9-10-July-2021.pdf. Assessed July 19, 2021.
  36. Gindis, David. “From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Institutional Economics 5, no. 1 (2009): 25–46.
  37. Gräbner, Claudius, and Jakob Kapeller. 2018. “The Micro-Macro Link in Heterodox Economics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics, edited by Tae-Hee Jo, Lynne Chester, and Carlo D‘Ippolti, 145–59. New York: Routledge.
  38. Gribnau, Hans J.L.M., and Ave-Geidi Jallai. “Good Tax Governance: A Matter of Moral Responsibility and Transparency.” Nordic Tax Journal, no. 1 (2017): 70–88.
  39. Hanlon, Michelle, and Shane Heitzman. “A Review of Tax Research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 50, nos. 2–3 (2010): 127–78.
  40. Heckemeyer, Jost H., and Michael Overesch. “Multinationals’ Profit Response to Tax Differentials: Effect Size and Shifting Channels.” Canadian Journal of Economics 50, no. 4 (2017): 965–94.
  41. IFRS Foundation (International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation). 2020. “Who Uses IFRS Standards?” https://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/. Accessed November 15, 2020.
  42. Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (1976): 305–60.
  43. KPMG. 2020. “BEPS Action 13: Country Implementation Summary.” https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/us/pdf/2020/07/beps-action-13-jul30-2020.pdf. 2020. Accessed November 15, 2020.
  44. Liu, Li, Tim Schmidt-Eisenlohr, and Dongxian Guo. “International Transfer Pricing and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Linked Trade-Tax Statistics in the United Kingdom.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 102, no. 4 (2020): 766–78.
  45. Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael D. Whinston, and Jerry R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  46. Murphy, Richard, Petr Jansky, and Atul Shah. “BEPS Policy Failure—the Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting.” Nordic Tax Journal, no. 1 (2019): 63–86.
  47. Murphy, Richard, and Prem Sikka. 2017. “Unitary Taxation: the Tax Base and the Role of Accounting.” In Taxing Multinational Enterprises as Unitary Firms, edited by Sol Picciotto, 75–89. Brighton: ICTD.
  48. Nienhüser, Werner. 2008. “Resource Dependence Theory—How Well Does It Explain Behavior of Organizations?” Management Revue—Socio-Economic Studies 19, nos. 1–2: 9–32.
  49. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Measuring and Monitoring BEPS, Action 11—2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015a.
  50. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting, Action 13—2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015b.
  51. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017a.
  52. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Background Brief —Inclusive Framework on BEPS. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017b.
  53. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Programme of Work to Develop a Consensus Solution to the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy, OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019a.
  54. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). Public Comments Received on the Secretariat Proposal for a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019b.
  55. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation—Report on Pillar One Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020a.
  56. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Statement by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on the Two-Pillar Approach to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy—January 2020, OECD/G20Inclusive Framework on BEPS. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020b.
  57. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Cover Statement by the Inclusive Framework on the Reports on the Blueprints of Pillar One and Pillar Two. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020c.
  58. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). “Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation—Report on Pillar Two Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020d.
  59. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation—Economic Impact Assessment: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020e.
  60. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising From the Digitalisation of the Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021.
  61. Opp, Karl-Dieter. “Micro-Macro Transitions in Rational Choice Explanations.” Analyse & Kritik 14, no 2 (1992): 143–51.
  62. Opp, Karl-Dieter. “Modeling Micro-Macro-Relationships: Problems and Solutions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35, nos. 1–3 (2011): 209–34.
  63. Paine, Lynn S. “Law, Ethics, and Managerial Judgement.” Journal of Legal Studies Education 12, no. 2 (1994): 153–70.
  64. Payne, Dinah, and Cecily Raiborn. “Aggressive Tax Avoidance: A Conundrum for Stakeholders, Governments, and Morality.” Journal of Business Ethics 147, no. 3 (2018): 469–87.
  65. Petrin, Martin, and Barnali Choudhury. “Group Company Liability.” European Business Organization Law Review 19, no. 4 (2018): 771–96.
  66. Pettit, Philip. “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Issues 11, no. 1 (2001): 268–99.
  67. Pettit, Philip. “Responsibility Incorporated.” Ethics January 117, no. 2 (2007): 171–201.
  68. Pettit, Philip. 2017. “The Conversable, Responsible Corporation.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Eric W. Orts and N. Craig Smith, 15–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  69. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
  70. Phillips, Michael J. “Reappraising the Real Entity Theory of the Corporation.” Florida State University Law Review 21, 4 (1994): 1061–1123.
  71. PWC. 2020. “Worldwide Tax Summaries Online.” https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/. Accessed November 15, 2020.
  72. Ratliff, James. 2003. “Consolidated Financial Accounts and Business Combinations.” In International Finance and Accounting Handbook, edited by Frederick Choi, 18.1–19. New York: Wiley.
  73. Robé, Jean-Phillipe. “The Legal Structure of the Firm.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–86.
  74. Samari, Alessandro. “The OECD Secretariat Proposal for a ‘Unified Approach’ under Pillar One: Strengths and Weaknesses of the New and Revised Nexus and Profit Allocation Rules.” International Transfer Pricing Journal 27, no. 2 (2019): 99–104.
  75. Schmiel, Ute. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fake Already According to the Theory of the Firm?” Management Revue—Socio-Economic Studies 30, nos. 2/3 (2019): 154–72.
  76. Schmiel, Ute. “Economic Analysis of Tax Law from a Sustainability Perspective.” Florida Tax Review 23, no. 2 (2020): 597–624.
  77. Schmiel, Ute and Hendrik Sander. “What are markets? Selected market theories under genuine uncertainty in comparison.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics (2021).
  78. Schreiber, Ulrich, Dirk Simons, Stefan Greil, and Martin Lagarden. “Why the Arm's Length Principle Should Be Maintained.” International Transfer Pricing Journal 27, no. 6 (2020): 1–10.
  79. Shubik, Martin. 2007. “Accounting and Its Relationship to General Equilibrium Theory.” In The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law, edited by by Yuri Biondi, Arnaldo Canziani, and Thierry Kirat, 73–81. Abingdon: Routledge.
  80. Sikka, Prem. “The Hand of Accounting and Accountancy Firms in Deepening Income and Wealth Inequalities and the Economic Crisis: Some Evidence.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, no. 30 (2015): 46–62.
  81. Sikka, Prem, and John Stittle. “Debunking the Myth of Shareholder Ownership of Companies: Some Implications for Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, no. 63 (2019): 101992.
  82. Stout, Lynn. 2017. “The Economic Nature of the Corporation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 2: Private and Commercial Law, edited by Francesco Parisi, 337–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  83. Timonen, Pekka. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Tax Behavior—Comment on the Paper by Reuven S. Avi-Yonah.” In Tax and Corporate Governance, edited by Wolfgang Schön, 199–203. Berlin: Springer.
  84. Vanberg, Viktor. “Organizations as Constitutional Systems.” Constitutional Political Economy 3, no. 2 (1992): 223–53.
  85. Witt, Ulrich. “Novelty and the Bounds of Unknowledge in Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 16, no. 4 (2009): 361–75.
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 46
Submitted on: Nov 23, 2020
Accepted on: May 29, 2021
Published on: Sep 18, 2021
Published by: DJØF Publishing, Nordic Tax Research Council
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2021 Anna-Lena Scherer, Ute Schmiel, published by DJØF Publishing, Nordic Tax Research Council
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.