The Rhetorical Handling and Construction of Uncertainty in Tax Litigation Concerning Valuation of Financial Instruments
References
- Almgren, Karin and Börje Leidhammar. 2016. Skatteprocessen [The tax process]. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.
- Bazelon, David L. 1981. “Science and Uncertainty: A Jurist's View.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 5: 209–215.
- Bazerman, Charles. 1985. “Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema.” Written communication 2 (1): 3–23.
- Berger, Linda L. 2008. “How embedded knowledge structures affect judicial decision making: A rhetorical analysis of metaphor, narrative, and imagination in child custody disputes.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 18: 259–308.
- Bhatia, Vijay. (2002). “Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines específicos (AELFE) 4: 3–19.
- Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
- Cheng, Winnie and Le Cheng. 2014. “Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland.” English for Specific Purposes 33: 15–26.
- Clemen, Gudrun. 1997. “The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions.” In Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, edited by Raija Markkanen and Hartmut Schröder, 235–248. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Corley, Pamela C. and Justin Wedeking. 2014. “The (dis) advantage of certainty: The importance of certainty in language.” Law & Society Review 48 (1): 35–62.
- Crompton, Peter. 1997. “Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (4): 271–287.
- Czarniawska-Joerges, Barbara & Bernward Joerges. 1988. “How to control things with words: Organizational talk and control.” Management Communication Quarterly 2 (2): 170–193.
- Diesen, Christian. 2003. Bevis 7 Bevisprövning i förvaltningsmål [Evidence 7 Evidence testing in litigation]. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
- Edin, Per-Olof and Sven-Olof Lodin. 2008. “En analys av en felaktig analys av 3:12-reglerna.” [An analysis of an incorrect analysis of the 3:12 rules]. Ekonomisk Debatt 36: 55–66.
- Ekström, Simon. 2003. “Att tala sanning.” [To speak the truth]. Tidsskrift for kulturforskning 2 (3): 5–21.
- Enough, Birte and Thomas Mussweiler. 2001. “Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom 1.” Journal of applied social psychology 31 (7): 1535–1551.
- Evans, Lisa. 2004. “Language, translation and the problem of international accounting communication.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17 (2): 210–248.
- Gold, Andrew S. 2006. “A Decision Theory Approach to the Business Judgment Rule: Reflections on Disney, Good Faith, and Judicial Uncertainty.” Maryland Law Review 66: 398–474.
- Hamer, David. 1994. “The civil standard of proof uncertainty: Probability, belief and justice.” Sydney Law Review 16: 506–536.
- Higdon, Michael J. 2009. “Something Judicious This Way Comes... The Use of Foreshadowing as a Persuasive Device in Judicial Narrative.” University of Richmond Law Review 44: 1213–1260.
- Hilling, Axel, Niklas Sandell and Anders Vilhelmsson. 2017. “Tax Planning in Partner-owned Close Corporations.” Nordic Tax Journal 1 (1): 108–120.
- Hilling, Axel, Niklas Sandell and Anders Vilhelmsson. 2018. “Lagen är lika för alla, men är alla verkligen lika inför lagen? En studie av Skatteverkets processföring i PwC-målet.” [The law is equal for everyone, but is everyone really equal before the law? A study of the Swedish Tax Agency's litigation in the PwC case] Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrift 2: 269–286.
- Hilling, Axel, Niklas Sandell and Anders Wilhelmsson. 2019. “The Pricing of Financial Instruments in Tax Disputes.” Derivatives & Financial Instruments 21 (2).
- Hinkle, Rachael K., Andrew D. Martin, Jonathan D. Shaub and Emerson H. Tiller. 2012. “A positive theory and empirical analysis of strategic word choice in district court opinions.” Journal of Legal Analysis 4 (2): 407–444.
- Hyland, Ken. 1994. “Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 239–256.
- Hyland, Ken. 1996a. “Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles.” Written Communication 13 (2): 251–281.
- Hyland, Ken. 1996b. “Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 433–454.
- Hyland, Ken. 1998. “Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter.” The Journal of Business Communication 35 (2): 224–244.
- Jalilifar, Ali R. and Maryam Alavi. 2012. “Power and politics of language use: A survey of hedging devices in political interviews.” Journal of Teaching Language Skills 30 (3): 43–66.
- Klimczak, Karol M. and Marta Dynel. 2018. “Evaluation markers and mitigators in analyst reports in light of market response to stock recommendations.” International Journal of Business Communication, 55 (3): 310–337.
- Klimczak, Karol M., Marta Dynel and Anna Pikos. 2016. “Goodwill impairment test disclosures under uncertainty.” Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems 15 (4): 639–660.
- Lakoff, George. 1973. “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” Journal of philosophical logic 2 (4): 458–508.
- Lavin, Rune. 2020. Förvaltningsprocessrätt [The procedure of litigation]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB.
- Lewin, Beverly A. 2005. “Hedging: an exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2): 163–178.
- Lindkvist, Gustav. 2016. Bevisfrågor i skatteprocessen: En översikt [Evidence issues in the tax process: an overview]. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.
- Longstaff, Francis A. (2018). “Valuing Thinly Traded Assets.” Management Science. 64 (8): 3868–3878.
- Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics: Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mattsson, Johan and Stefan Larsson. 2014. “Juridikens dolda tankestrukturer. Observationer av metaforbruk i den svenska civil-rätten.” Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 127 (05): 512–534.
- McLaren-Hankin, Yvonne. 2008. “We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year’: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases.” Discourse Studies 10 (5): 635–654.
- Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. “Genre as social action.” Quarterly journal of speech, 70 (2): 151–167.
- Mortensen, Sune S. and Janus Mortensen. 2017. “Epistemic stance in courtroom interaction.” In Pragmatics and Law, edited by Francesca Poggi and Alessandro Capone, 401–437. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Myers, Greg. 1989. “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles.” Applied linguistics 10 (1): 1–35.
- Newberg, Joshua A. 2002. “The narrative construction of antitrust.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 12: 181–216.
- Olchowy, James R. 2003. “Battling for the Judge's or Jury's Imagination: Evidence, Storytelling, and Effective Trial Advocacy.” Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues 16 (1): 1–22.
- Prasad, Pushkala. 2005. Crafting qualitative research: Working in the post-positivist traditions. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharp.
- Resche, Catherine. 2015. “Hedging in the discourse of central banks.” Studies in Communication Sciences 15 (1): 83–92.
- Robertson, Bernard and G. Anthony Vignaux. 1993. “Probability—the logic of the law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (4): 457–478.
- Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. “Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (2): 149–170.
- Sandell, Niklas and Peter Svensson. 2016. “The language of failure: The use of accounts in financial reports.” International Journal of Business Communication 53 (1): 5–26.
- Sandell, Niklas and Peter Svensson. 2017. “Writing write-downs: The rhetoric of goodwill impairment.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 14 (1): 81–102.
- Sherwin, Richard K. 1993. “The narrative construction of legal reality.” Vermont Law Review 18: 681–719.
- Svensson, Peter. 2019. Diskursanalys [Discourse analysis]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
- Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2013. “ “I think my own view is that.. .” On the Linguistic Construction of Evidence in Courtroom Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 12: 65–74.
- Tai, Stephanie. 2008. “Uncertainty about uncertainty: The impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (3): 671–728.
- Taweel, Abeer Q., Emad M. Saidat, Hussein A. Rafayah and Ahmad M. Saidat. 2011. “Hedging in Political Discourse.” Linguistics Journal 5 (1): 169–196.
- Toska, Bledar. 2012. “Epistemic Hedges and Boosters as Stance Markers in Legal Argumentative Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 10: 57–62.
- Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112.
- Vass, Holly. 2004. “Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE) 7 : 125–141.
- Vass, Holly. 2017. “Lexical verb hedging in legal discourse: The case of law journal articles and Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions.” English for Specific Purposes 48: 17–31.
- Vold, Eva T. 2006. “Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16 (1): 61–87.
- Wang, Huili, Lixin Li and Jingxiang Cao. 2012. “Lexical features in corporate annual reports: A corpus-based study.” European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 1 (9): 55–71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ntaxj-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2246-1809
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 44
Submitted on: Aug 4, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 12, 2021
Published on: Sep 18, 2021
Published by: DJØF Publishing, Nordic Tax Research Council
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 Niklas Sandell, published by DJØF Publishing, Nordic Tax Research Council
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.