Transparency of datafied journalism: Finnish news users’ response profiles to an interventionist audience study
By: Liisa Ovaska
References
- Ahva, L. (2025). The positions of data-related peripheral actors in journalism practice. International Journal of Communication, 19, 1291–1310.
https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/23371 - Ahva, L., Salonen, M., Ovaska, L., & Talvitie-Lamberg, K. (2024). The managerial and future-oriented role of audience data in data-informed news organisations. Journalism, 27(1), 3–21.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241285721 - Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645 - Arguedas, A. R. (2024). Public attitudes towards the use of AI in journalism. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, C. T. Robertson, A. R. Arguedas, & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute digital news report 2024 (pp. 39–43). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-vy6n-4v57 - Blom, J. N., Heiselberg, L., van Dalen, A., & Andersen, I. (2025). “I think it’s exciting and frightening at the same time”: Audience sentiments toward the use and labeling of generative AI in journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. OnlineFirst.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251385943 - Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa - Carlson, M. (2018). Confronting measurable journalism. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 406–417.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1445003 - Castro, L., Strömbäck, J., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., de Vreese, C., Aalberg, T., Cardenal, A. S., Corbu, N., Hopmann, D. N. Koc-Michalska K., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Sheafer, T., Splendore, S., Stanyer, J., Stępińska, A., Štětka, V., & Theocharis, Y. (2022). Navigating high-choice European political information environments: A comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 827–859.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211012572 - Chadha, K., & Koliska, M. (2015). Newsrooms and transparency in the digital age. Journalism Practice, 9(2), 215–229.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.924737 - Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism: From quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326–2342.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681 - Curry, A. L., & Stroud, N. J. (2019). The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism, 22(4), 901–918.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919850387 - Curry, A. L., & Stroud, N. J. (2021). The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism, 22(4), 901–918.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919850387 - Das, R., Wong, Y. N., Jones, R., & Jackson, P. J. (2024). How do we speak about algorithms and algorithmic media futures? Using vignettes and scenarios in a citizen council on data-driven media personalisation. New Media & Society, 27(7), 3931–3949.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241232589 - Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Algorithmic transparency in the news media. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809–828.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053 - Dogruel, L. (2021). Folk theories of algorithmic operations during internet use: A mixed methods study. The Information Society, 37(5), 287–298.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1949768 - Domingo, D., & Heikkilä, H. (2012). Media accountability practices in online news media. In E. Siapera, & A. Veglis (Eds.), Handbook of global online journalism (pp. 272–289). John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118313978 - Ehrlén, V., Talvitie-Lamberg, K., Salonen, M., Koivula, M., Villi, M., & Uskali, T. (2023). Confusing content, platforms, and data: Young adults and trust in news media. Media and Communication, 11(4), 320–331.
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7104 - Einarsson, Á. M., Petrucci, E., Møller Hartley, J., Lomborg, S., & Kruse, J. (2025). “I must have clicked on something” – Users’ experiences and evaluations of news recommender systems. Journalism Practice, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2572972 - Felaco, C. (2024). Researching algorithm awareness: Methodological approaches to investigate how people perceive, know, and interact with algorithms. Mathematical Population Studies, 31(4), 267–288.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2024.2389779 - Fisher, C., Flew, T., Park, S., Lee, J. Y., & Dulleck, U. (2021). Improving trust in news: Audience solutions. Journalism Practice, 15(10), 1497–1515.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1787859 - Fürst, S. (2020). In the service of good journalism and audience interests? How audience metrics affect news quality. Media and Communication, 8(3), 270–280.
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3228 - Haapanen, L. (2022). Problematising the restoration of trust through transparency: Focusing on quoting. Journalism, 23(4), 875–891.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920934236 - Hastuti, H., Maulana, H. F., Lawelai, H., & Suherman, A. (2025). Algorithmic influence and media legitimacy: A systematic review of social media’s impact on news production. Frontiers in Communication, 10, Article 1667471.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1667471 - Heikkilä, H. (2022). Ethical pitfalls of audience metrics. In V. J. E. Manninen, M. K. Niemi, & A. Ridge-Newman (Eds.), Futures of journalism: Technology-stimulated evolution in the audience–news media relationship (pp. 113–125). Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_8 - Heim, K., & Craft, S. (2020). Transparency in journalism: Meanings, merits, and risks. In L. Wilkins, & C. G. Christians (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mass media ethics (2nd ed.) (pp. 308–320). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545929 - Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom, and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 535–545.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003638400 - Karlsson, M. (2021). Transparency and journalism: A critical appraisal of a disruptive norm. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340642 - Karlsson, M., & Clerwall, C. (2018). Transparency to the rescue? Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1923–1933.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492882 - Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2014). You ain’t seen nothing yet. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 668–678.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.886837 - Koliska, M. (2021). Transparency in journalism. In M. Powers (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (Online ed.). Oxford Academic.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.883 - Koliska, M. (2022). Trust and journalistic transparency online. Journalism Studies, 23(12), 1488–1509.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2102532 - Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P. H. (2020). Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719855301 - Manninen, V. J. E. (2020). If only they knew: Audience expectations and actual sourcing practices in online journalism. Journalism Practice, 14(4), 412–428.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1625719 - Mitova, E., Blassnig, S., Strikovic, E., Urman, A., de Vreese, C., & Esser, F. (2023). Exploring users’ desire for transparency and control in news recommender systems: A five-nation study. Journalism, 25(10), 2001–2021.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231222099 - Mathieu, D., & Møller Hartley, J. (2021). Low on trust, high on use: Datafied media, trust and everyday life. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211059480 - Noppari, E., Hiltunen, I., & Ahva, L. (2019). User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(1), 23–37.
https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1 - Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., Romann, L. R., Witkowich, I., & Chen, J. (2025). Exploring social media users’ experiences with algorithmic transparency cues. New Media & Society. OnlineFirst.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251339493 - Ovaska, L. (2024). From permissive to resistive tactics: How audience members engage with and make sense of datafied journalism. Convergence, 30(6), 2008–2024.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241283434 - Ovaska, L. (2025). ‘It’s all about money’ – News users’ folk theory of audience data utilisation in journalism. Digital Journalism, 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2567342 - Penttilä, P. (2024). Autonomy behind the paywall: Subscription-chasing and journalistic freedom at the level of practice. Journalism Practice, 20(3), 1092–1109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2389204 - Picone, I., De Wolf, R., & Robijt, S. (2016). Who shares what with whom and why? News sharing profiles amongst Flemish news users. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 921–932.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1168708 - Reunanen, E. (2025). Finland. In N. Newman, A. R. Arguedas, C. T. Robertson, R. K. Nielsen, & R. Fletcher (Eds.), Reuters institute digital news report 2025 (pp. 80–81). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-8qqf-jt36 - Rydenfelt, H., Haapanen, L., & Lehtiniemi, T. (2021). Dataa näkyvissä: Läpinäkyvyys algoritmien ja datan journalistisessa hyödyntämisessä [Data in the spotlight: Transparency in the journalistic use of algorithms and data]. Media & Viestintä, 44(2), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.109857 - Rydenfelt, H., Haapanen, L., Haapoja, J., & Lehtiniemi, T. (2022). Personalisation in journalism: Ethical insights and blindspots in Finnish legacy media. Journalism, 25(2), 313–333.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221138424 - Shin, D. (2021). Why does explainability matter in news analytic systems? Proposing explainable analytic journalism. Journalism Studies, 22(8), 1047–1065.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1916984 - Simon, F. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the news: How AI retools, rationalizes, and reshapes journalism and the public arena. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University.
https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/artificial-intelligence-in-the-news.php - Storms, E., Alvarado, O., & Monteiro-Krebs, L. (2022). “Transparency is meant for control” and vice versa: Learning from co-designing and evaluating algorithmic news recommenders. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1–24.
- Swart, J., Groot Kormelink, T., Costera Meijer, I., & Broersma, M. (2022). Advancing a radical audience turn in journalism: Fundamental dilemmas for journalism studies. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 8–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2024764 - Tandoc, E. Jr. (2019). Analyzing analytics: Disrupting journalism one click at a time. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138496538 - Tandoc, E. C., & Thomas, R. J. (2017). Readers value objectivity over transparency. Newspaper Research Journal, 38(1), 32–45.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532917698446 - Taylor, M., Kennedy, H., & Oman, S. (2023). Challenging assumptions about the relationship between awareness of and attitudes to data uses amongst the UK public. The Information Society, 40(1), 32–53.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2283729 - Thurman, N., Moeller, J., Helberger, N., & Trilling, D. (2018). My friends, editors, algorithms, and I: Examining audience attitudes to news selection. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 447–469.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1493936 - Toff, B., & Simon, F. M. (2025). “Or they could just not use it?” The dilemma of AI disclosure for audience trust in news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(4), 881–903.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241308697 - Uth, B. (2022). The quality oriented, the audience engagers, the transparent: Types of editorial trust-building in German news outlets. Journalism, 25(2), 391–408.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221141522
Language: English
Page range: 126 - 146
Published on: May 22, 2026
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Liisa Ovaska, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.