Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Telegram as a multifaceted platform for antagonistic political passion: The Finnish alternative groups under the scope Cover

Telegram as a multifaceted platform for antagonistic political passion: The Finnish alternative groups under the scope

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Almodt, R. (2024). From criticism to conspiracies: The populist discourse of Covid-19 sceptics in Germany’s Querdenken community on Telegram. Discourse & Society, 35(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231191971
  2. Al-Rawi, A. (2022). News loopholing: Telegram news as portable alternative media. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(1), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00155-3
  3. Anglano, C., Canonico, M., & Guazzone, M. (2017). Forensic analysis of Telegram messenger on Android smartphones. Digital Investigation, 23, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2017.09.002
  4. Arter, D. (2023). From Finlandisation and post-Finlandisation to the end of Finlandisation? Finland’s road to a NATO application. European Security, 32(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2113062
  5. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2007). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  6. Bovet, A., & Grindrod, P. (2022). Organization and evolution of the UK far-right network on Telegram. Applied Network Science, 7(1), Article 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00513-8
  7. Brand Analytics. (2022). Change in the number of Russian-speaking active social media authors from February 24 to September 24, 2022, by platform. Statista. https://tinyurl.com/5x6pry3t
  8. Bryanov, K., Vasina, D., Pankova, Y., & Pakholkov, V. (2022). The other side of deplatforming: Right-wing Telegram in the wake of Trump’s Twitter ouster [Conference paper]. In D. A. Alexandrov, A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova, I. Musabirov, & S. Pashakhin (Eds.), Digital transformation and global society (Vol. 1503) (pp. 417–428). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93715-7_30
  9. Buehling, K., & Heft, A. (2023). Pandemic protesters on Telegram: How platform affordances and information ecosystems shape digital counterpublics. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305123119943
  10. Chunaev, P. (2020). Community detection in node-attributed social networks: A survey. Computer Science Review, 37, 100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100286
  11. Cohen, G. L. (2022). Belonging: The science of creating connection and bridging divides. W. W. Norton & Company.
  12. Collier, K., Schecter, A., & Kaplan, E. (2021, January 15). Telegram, a recent haven for the far right, purges extremist content. NBC News. https://tinyurl.com/23kjvjzx
  13. Conner, C. T., & MacMurray, N. (2022). The perfect storm: A subcultural analysis of the QAnon movement. Critical Sociology, 48(6), 1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211055863
  14. Clausnitzer, J. (2025, January 22). Share of Telegram users in Finland 2024, by frequency. Statista. https://tinyurl.com/52vx8btm
  15. Deakin, D. R. (2021, January 15). WhatsApp scrambles to stem the flow of users moving to rivals Signal and Telegram as millions protest against controversial privacy policy. NotebookCheck. https://tinyurl.com/ywjx6t97
  16. Forsberg, T. (2024). Bottom-up foreign policy? Finland, NATO and public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 47(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12273
  17. Forsberg, T., & Pesu, M. (2016). The “Finlandisation” of Finland: The ideal type, the historical model, and the lessons learnt. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(3), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2016.1196069
  18. Grossman, E. (2025). Anti-science and science-skeptical attitudes over time: The case of France in historical perspective. Public Understanding of Science, 34(7), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251320331
  19. Haller, A., & Holt, K. (2019). Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882
  20. Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. (2016). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026
  21. Henriksen, F. M. (2024). Anti-systemic counterpublics: Rethinking the counterpublic sphere. Javnost – The Public, 31(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2024.2342219
  22. Humprecht, E., Amsler, M., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2024). Emotionalized social media environments: How alternative news media and populist actors drive angry reactions. Political Communication, 41(4), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2350416
  23. Häkkänen, A. (2017). Esipuhe [Preface]. In L. Männistö, & N. Wilhelmsson (Eds.), Demokratiassa kuplii: Dialogin mahdollisuus suomalaisessa digiyhteiskunnassa [Democracy is bubbling: The possibility of dialogue in the Finnish digital society] (pp. 4–5). Oikeusministeriö.
  24. Ihlebæk, K. A., & Holter, C. R. (2021). Hostile emotions: An exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news media. Journalism, 22(5), 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726
  25. Jalilvand, A., & Neshati, M. (2020). Channel retrieval: Finding relevant broadcasters on Telegram. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 10(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-0629-z
  26. Jost, P., & Dogruel, L. (2023). Radical mobilization in times of crisis: Use and effects of appeals and populist communication features in Telegram channels. Social Media+ Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186372
  27. Jost, P., Heft, A., Buehling, K., Zehring, M., Schulze, H., Bitzmann, H., & Domahidi, E. (2023). Mapping a dark space: Challenges in sampling and classifying non-institutionalized actors on Telegram. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft: M & K, 71(3-4), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2023-3-4-212
  28. Kantola, A. (2024, February 9). Pitääkö median ajaa isänmaan asiaa? Päätoimittaja Petri Korhosen mielestä kyllä [Should the media promote the national interest? Editor in chief Petri Korhonen thinks so]. Journalisti [Journalist]. https://tinyurl.com/cm49v492
  29. Kareinen, J. (2017). Yhteiskuntamme huutaa dialogin puutteesta [Our society is crying out for a lack of dialogue]. In L. Männistö, & N. Wilhelmsson (Eds.), Demokratiassa kuplii: Dialogin mahdollisuus suomalaisessa digiyhteiskunnassa [Democracy is bubbling: The possibility of dialogue in the Finnish digital society] (pp. 20–22). Oikeusministeriö.
  30. Koivunen, A. (2021). Managing moods: Media, politicians, and anxiety over public debate. In A. Koivunen, J. Ojala, & J. Holmén (Eds.), The Nordic economic, social and political model: Challenges in the 21st century (pp. 195–211). Routledge.
  31. Kristensen, J. B., Henriksen, F. M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2023). Did Covid-19 blur partisan boundaries? A comparison of partisan affinity and source heterophily in online alternative news-sharing networks before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231192963
  32. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2023). Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice and software (2nd ed.). Sage.
  33. Lou, C., Tandoc, E. C., Hong, L. X., Pong, X. Y. (B.), Lye, W. X. (R.), & Sng, N. G. (T.) (2021). When motivations meet affordances: News consumption on Telegram. Journalism Studies, 22(7), 934–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1906299
  34. Malkki, L., & Pohjonen, M. (2019). Jihadist online communication and Finland. Publications of the Ministry of the Interior 2019:29. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-324-300-2
  35. Marandici, I. (2023). Z-propaganda and semiotic resistance: Contesting Russia’s war symbols in Moldova and beyond. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 71(4), 585–616. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2023-0024
  36. Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf
  37. Mayerhöffer, E., Kristensen, J. B., & Ramsland, T. (2024). Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environments in Sweden and Denmark. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 92–119. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0009
  38. Mouffe, C. (2005a). On the political. Routledge.
  39. Mouffe, C. (2005b). The “end of politics” and the challenge of right-wing populism. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 50–71). Verso.
  40. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.
  41. NetworkX. (n.d.). Conductance. https://tinyurl.com/fvh27y4u
  42. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Jounrnalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023
  43. Nisch, S. (2024). Public opinion about Finland joining NATO: Analyzing Twitter posts by performing natural language processing. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2235565
  44. Nobari, A. D., Sarraf, M. H., & Neshati, M. (2021). Characteristics of viral messages on Telegram: The world’s largest hybrid public and private messenger. Expert Systems with Applications, 168, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114303
  45. Oleinik, A. (2024). Telegram channels covering Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: A comparative analysis of large multilingual corpora. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7, 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-023-00240-9
  46. Rao, A., Morstatter, F., Hu, M., Chen, E., Burghardt, K., Ferrara, E., & Lerman, K. (2021). Political partisanship and antiscience attitudes in online discussions about Covid-19: Twitter content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e26692. https://doi.org/10.2196/26692
  47. Rogers, R. (2020). Deplatforming: Following extreme internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922066
  48. Simon, M., Welbers, K., Kroon, C., & Trilling, D. (2023). Linked in the dark: A network approach to understanding information flows within the Dutch Telegramsphere. Information, Communication & Society, 26(15), 3054–3078. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2133549
  49. Schulze, H., Hohner, J., Greipl, S., Girgnhuber, M., Desta, I., & Rieger, D. (2022). Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: A longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on Telegram. Convergence, 28(4), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221104977
  50. Schuurman, B., & Taylor, M. (2018). Reconsidering radicalization: Fanaticism and the link between ideas and violence. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(1), 3–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26343743
  51. Steen-Johnsen, K., Fladmoe, A., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2025). Right-wing alternative media users in Scandinavia: A comparative study of ideological attitudes and (dis)trust. Nordicom Review, 46(2), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2025-0019
  52. Telegram. (2023, November 30). Similar channels, reposting stories, and 9 more features. Telegram Team. https://telegram.org/blog/similar-channels
  53. Tuomola, S. (2023a). Maahanmuuttovastaisuudesta koronakriittisyyteen. Populistisen vastamedian laajeneva ekosysteemi journalismin näkökulmasta [From anti-immigrant attitude to corona criticism: The expanding ecosystem of populist countermedia from the journalistic perspective]. Media & viestintä, 46(2), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.131188
  54. Tuomola, S. (2023b). Hyvä, katala vastajulkisuus. Populistisen vastamedian julkisen puhuttelun tavat maahanmuutto- ja pakolaiskeskustelussa. [The good, the mean, the counterpublics: The conventions of public address of populist countermedia in the immigrant and refugee discourse] [Academic Dissertation, Tampere University, Finland].
  55. Urman, A., & Katz, S. (2022). What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1803946
  56. Uutela, M. (2020). The end of Finlandization: Finland’s foreign policy in the eyes of the two German states 1985–1990. The International History Review, 42(2), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2019.1577286
  57. Valaskivi, K., Jääskeläinen, P., Huhtamäki, J., & Sumiala, J. (2023). “Holy shit!!! Jos tuo ei herätä ihmisiä niin sitten ei mikään!” Salaliittoteoreettinen populistinen kuvittelu ja tunnestruktuurit sosiaalisessa mediassa [“Holy shit!!! If that doesn’t wake people up, then nothing will!” Conspiratorial populist imagination and emotional structures in social media]. Media & viestintä, 46(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.128479
  58. Van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. T. (2023). Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media & Society, 12(25), 3438–3454. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045662
  59. Willaert, T. (2023). A computational analysis of Telegram’s narrative affordances. PLOS one, 18(11), e0293508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293508
  60. Willaert, T., Peeters, S., Seijbel, J., & Van Raemdonck, N. (2022). Disinformation networks: A quali-quantitative investigation of antagonistic Dutch-speaking Telegram channels. First Monday, 27(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i5.12533
  61. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
  62. Wodak, R. (2020). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664
  63. Zehring, M., & Domahidi, E. (2023). German corona protest mobilizers on Telegram and their relations to the far right: A network and topic analysis. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231155106
  64. Zhong, W., Bailard, C., Broniatowski, D., & Tromble, R. (2024). Proud Boys on Telegram. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 4, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2024.003
  65. Zuckerman, E., Mercea, D., & Mosca, L. (2023). Why study media ecosystems? In D. Mercea, & L. Mosca (Eds.), Understanding movement parties through their communication (pp. 169–187). Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2026-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 107 - 132
Published on: May 15, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Salla Tuomola, Jakob Bæk Kristensen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.