References
- Corner, J. (2013). Is there a ‘field’ of media research? – The ‘fragmentation’ issue revisited. Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 1011–1018.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508702 - Couldry, N. (2013). If not a single field, then what? Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 1023–1026.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508704 - Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x - Donsbach, W. (2006). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 437–448.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.x - George, B., Andersen, L. B., Hall, J. L., & Pandey, S. K. (2023). Writing impactful reviews to rejuvenate public administration: A framework and recommendations. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1517–1527.
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13756 - Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x - Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473–496). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9 - Hong, Q. N., & Pluye, P. (2018). Systematic reviews: A brief historical overview. Education for Information, 34(4), 261–276.
https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180219 - Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553–560.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600407 - Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.
- Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11). Sage.
- Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health research. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 - Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001 - Tunstall, J. (1983). The trouble with U.S. communication research. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 92–95.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02410.x - Waisbord, S. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. John Wiley & Sons.
- Wenzel, M., Gylfe, P., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2025, May 14). The manifold impacts of management research. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13240 - Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 215–224.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402003068