Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Datafied news work: A scoping literature review Cover

Datafied news work: A scoping literature review

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. *Ahva, L., & Ovaska, L. (2023). Audience metrics as disruptive innovation: Analysing emotional work of Finnish journalism professionals. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0009
  2. Anderson, C. W. (2011a). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism, 12(5), 550–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911402451
  3. Anderson, C. W. (2011b). Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: Journalism’s vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. International Journal of Communication, 5, 529–547. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/884
  4. *Andersson Schwarz, J. (2016). Public service broadcasting and data-driven personalization: A view from Sweden. Television & New Media, 17(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415616193
  5. Andreassen, A. M. (2020). Sådan forandrer automatisering medierne: En guide til dig i mediebranchen [How automation transforms the media: A guide for you in the media industry]. University of Southern Denmark Press.
  6. *Appelgren, E. (2017). The reasons behind tracing audience behavior: A matter of paternalism and transparency. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2178–2197. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6823
  7. *Appelgren, E., & Nygren, G. (2014). Data journalism in Sweden: Introducing new methods and genres of journalism into “old” organizations. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.884344
  8. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  9. *Barland, J. (2013). Innovasjon av inntekter: Journalistikk som bygger kunderelasjoner [Innovation of revenues: Journalism that builds relations]. Journalistica, 1, 74–95. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v7i1.15804
  10. *Bechmann, A., Bilgrav-Nielsen, K., & Jensen, A.-L. K. (2016). Data as a revenue model: Sharewall as a payment method and editorial algorithm in the news industry. Nordicom-Information, 38(1), 76–82. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-4447
  11. Belair-Gagnon, V., & Holton, A. E. (2018). Boundary work, interloper media, and analytics in newsrooms: An analysis of the roles of web analytics companies in news production. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1445001
  12. Berlingske. (2018, February 28). Berlingske Media skal være Danmarks førende digitale mediehus [Berlingske Media must be the leading digital media organisation in Denmark]. https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/berlingske-media-skal-vaere-danmarks-foerende-digitale-mediehus
  13. *Borchgrevink-Brækhus, M. (2022). «Det er ikke plass til alt på internett»: Algoritmestyrte forsider og redaksjonelle vurderinger [“There is not space for everything on the internet”: algorithmically controlled frontpages and editorial judgment]. Norsk medietidsskrift, 29(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18261/nmt.29.3.4
  14. boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
  15. Bro, P., Hansen, K. R., & Andersson, R. (2016). Improving productivity in the newsroom? Deskilling, reskilling and multiskilling in the news media. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1090883
  16. Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(16), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127
  17. *Bucher, T. (2017). ‘Machines don’t have instincts’: Articulating the computational in journalism. New Media & Society, 19(6), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815624182
  18. *Ekström, M., Ramsälv, A., & Westlund, O. (2022). Data-driven news work culture: Reconciling tensions in epistemic values and practices of news journalism. Journalism, 23(4), 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211052419
  19. *Engebretsen, M., Kennedy, H., & Weber, W. (2018). Data visualization in Scandinavian newsrooms: Emerging trends in journalistic visualization practices. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0007
  20. Flensburg, S., & Lomborg, S. (2021). Datafication research: Mapping the field for a future agenda. New Media & Society, 26(5), 1451–1469. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211046616
  21. Flyverbom, M., & Murray, J. (2018). Datastructuring—Organizing and curating digital traces into action. Big Data & Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718799114
  22. *Fridman, M., Krøvel, R., & Palumbo, F. (2023). How (not to) run an AI project in investigative journalism. Journalism Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2253797
  23. García-Avilés, J. A., León, B., Sanders, K., & Harrison, J. (2004). Journalists at digital television newsrooms in Britain and Spain: Workflow and multi-skilling in a competitive environment. Journalism Studies, 5(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670032000174765
  24. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  25. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
  26. Hansen, H. K. (2015). Numerical operations, transparency illusions and the datafication of governance. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014555260
  27. *Hartley, J. M. (2012). Nyheder på internettet [News on the internet]. Handelshøjskolens Forlag.
  28. Hartley, J. M., Petre, C., Bengtsson, M., & Kammer, A. (2023). Autonomies and dependencies: Shifting configurations of power in the platformization of news. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1375–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2257759
  29. Hartley, J. M., Sørensen, J. K., & Mathieu, D. (Eds.). (2023). DataPublics: The construction of publics in datafied democracies. Bristol University Press.
  30. *Hartley, J. M., & Thylstrup, N. B. (2025). The algorithmic gut feeling – Articulating journalistic doxa and emerging epistemic frictions in AI-driven data work. Digital Journalism, 13(3), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2319641
  31. *Holand, A. M., & Engan, B. (2020). Nyheter på autopilot? Ulike tilpasninger av automatisert medietilbud i lokalaviser [News on auto-pilot? Various adaptations of automated media offerings in local newspapers]. Norsk medietidsskrift, 27(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.0805-9535-2020-02-03
  32. Humprecht, E., Herrero, L. C., Blassnig, S., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2022). Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054
  33. *Ishøj, J. (2009). Interaktive kort som journalistisk redskab [Interactive maps as journalistic tool]. Geoforum Perspektiv, 8(15). https://tidsskrift.dk/gfp/article/view/5926
  34. Jørstad, M. (2022). Hvad brugerne vil ha’: Styrk din journalistik med brugerdata, indsigter og innovation [What the users want: Strengthen your journalism with user data, insights, and innovation]. University of Southern Denmark Press.
  35. *Kalsnes, B. (2019). Local journalism seen through the numbers: Interpreting metrics through quantitative and qualitative methods. In A. L. Bygdås, S. Clegg, & A. Hagen (Eds.), Media management and digital transformation (pp. 40–50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490187
  36. *Kammer, A. (2013). The mediatization of journalism. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, 29(54), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i54.17385
  37. Kammer, A. (2016). A welfare perspective on Nordic media subsidies. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2016.1238272
  38. Kammer, A. (2017). Market structure and innovation policies in Denmark. In H. van Kranenburg (Ed.), Innovation policies in the European news and media industry: A comparative study (pp. 37–47). Springer.
  39. *Kammer, A. (2023a). Resource exchanges between mobile news apps and third-parties. Digital Journalism, 11(6), 1154–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2000455
  40. Kammer, A. (2023b). Spaces for datafication: How datafication transforms media industries. In A. Godulla, & S. Böhm (Eds.), Digital disruption and media transformation: How technological innovation shapes the future of communication (pp. 133–141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39940-4
  41. *Karlsson, M., & Clerwall, C. (2013). Negotiating professional news judgment and “clicks”: Comparing tabloid, broadsheet and public service traditions in Sweden. Nordicom Review, 34(2), 65–76. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/37380
  42. Kennedy, H., Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2015). Data and agency. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715621569
  43. Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
  44. Kitchin, R., & McArdle, G. (2016). What makes big data, big data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716631130
  45. *Kristensen, L. M. (2023). Audience metrics: Operationalizing news value for the digital newsroom. Journalism Practice, 17(5), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1954058
  46. *Kristensen, L. M., & Hartley, J. M. (2023). The infrastructuring of news: Infrastructural capture and autonomy in AI-driven news distribution. Media and Communication, 11(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.i351
  47. Kristensen, L. M., & Sørensen, J. K. (2023). Classifying the news: Metadata as structures of visibility and compliance with tech standards. In: J. M. Hartley, J. K. Sørensen, & D. Mathieu (Eds.), DataPublics: The construction of publics in datafied democracies (pp. 145–164). Bristol University Press.
  48. Küng, L. (2023). Strategic management in the media: Theory to practice (3rd ed.). Sage.
  49. Lindberg, T. (2023). Nordic news media in global competition: The conditions for news journalism in the digital platform economy. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855718
  50. *Lindén, C.-G., Villi, M., Lehtisaari, K., & Grönlund, M. (2022). From clicks and time spent to value creation. In V. J. E. Manninen, M. K. Niemi, & A. Ridge-Newman (Eds.), Futures of journalism: Technology-stimulated evolution in the audience-news media relationship (pp. 329–346). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_21
  51. Lindskow, K. (2015). Exploring digital news publishing business models: A production network approach. Copenhagen Business School & JP/Politikens Hus.
  52. Lury, C. (2021). Problem spaces: How and why methodology matters. Polity.
  53. Lycett, M. (2013). ‘Datafication’: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.10
  54. MacGregor, P. (2007). Tracking the online audience: Metric data start a subtle revolution. Journalism Studies, 8(2), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601148879
  55. Maguire, J., Langstrup, H., Danholt, P., & Gad, C. (2020). Engaging the data moment: An introduction. STS Encounters, 11(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.7146/stse.v11i1.135273
  56. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2034522
  57. Ministry of Culture. (2017). Globaliseringen af den danske mediebranche: Analyser af internationale aktørers betydning for det danske mediemarked, danske medieudbydere og dansk medieindhold [The globalisation of the Danish media: Analyses of the importance of international players for the Danish media market, Danish media providers, and Danish media content]. The Danish Ministry of Culture.
  58. Ministry of Culture. (2024). Danskernes adgang til digitalt nyheds- og aktualitetsindhold [Danes’ access to digital news and current affairs]. The Danish Ministry of Culture.
  59. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  60. Møller, L. A. (2022a). Between personal and public interest: How algorithmic news recommendation reconciles with journalism as an ideology. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1794–1812. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2032782
  61. Møller, L. A. (2022b). Recommended for you: How newspapers normalise algorithmic news recommendation to fit their gatekeeping role. Journalism Studies, 23(7), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2034522
  62. Nechushtai, E. (2018). Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure? Journalism, 19(8), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917725163
  63. Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2017). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318
  64. Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2022). The power of platforms: Shaping media and society. Oxford University Press.
  65. OECD. (2024). 2023 OECD digital government index. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023-oecd-digital-government-index_1a89ed5e-en.html
  66. *Olsen, G. R. (2021). Accepting automated news as “low-quality” journalism. Journalistica, 15(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v15i1.124985
  67. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Aki, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  68. Petre, C. (2021). All the news that’s fit to click: How metrics are transforming the work of journalists. Princeton University Press.
  69. Poell, T., Nieborg, D. S., & Duffy, B. E. (2023). Spaces of negotiation: Analyzing platform power in the news industry. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2103011
  70. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press.
  71. *Rolandsson, T., Widholm, A., & Rahm-Skågeby, J. (2022). Managing public service: The harmonization of datafication and managerialism in the development of a news-sorting algorithm. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1691–1709. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2119151
  72. *Salonen, M., Ehrlén, V., Koivula, M., & Talvitie-lamberg, K. (2023). Post-publication gatekeeping factors and practices: Data, platforms, and regulations in news work. Media and Communication, 11(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6486
  73. *Schjøtt Hansen, A., & Hartley, J. M. (2023). Designing what’s news: An ethnography of a personalization algorithm and the data-driven (re)assembling of the news. Digital Journalism, 11(6), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1988861
  74. Simon, F. M. (2022). Uneasy bedfellows: AI in the news, platform companies and the issue of journalistic autonomy. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1832–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150
  75. *Sirén-Heikel, S., Leppänen, L., Lindén, C.-G., & Bäck, A. (2019). Unboxing news automation: Exploring imagined affordances of automation in news journalism. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 1(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2019-0004
  76. *Sjøvaag, H., & Owren, T. (2021). The non-substitutability of local news? Advertising and the decline of journalism’s umbrella market model. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0001
  77. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
  78. Steensen, S., & Westlund, O. (2023). What is digital journalism studies? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259555
  79. *Svendsen, R. D., Gulla, J. A., & Frøland, J. (2019). Anbefaling av nyhetsinnhold i praksis: Fra algoritmer til personaliserte nyheter [News recommendation in practice: From algorithms to personalised news]. Norsk medietidsskrift, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.0805-9535-2019-01-04
  80. Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
  81. *Sørensen, J. K. (2020). The datafication of public service media: Dreams, dilemmas and practical problems: A case study of the implementation of personalized recommendations at the Danish public service media ‘DR.’ MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, 36(69), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.121180
  82. *Tenor, C. (2024). Metrics as the new normal – exploring the evolution of audience metrics as a decision-making tool in Swedish newsrooms 1995–2022. Journalism, 25(5), 1111–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231169185
  83. van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: public values in a connected world. Oxford University Press.
  84. *Vulpius, J. (2023). “We need to think about their real needs”: Examining the auxiliary work of audience-oriented intralopers in news organizations. Digital Journalism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2288245
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2025-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 107
Published on: May 28, 2025
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Aske Kammer, Lisa Merete Kristensen, Elisabetta Petrucci, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.