Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Audiovisual fiction and democracy: A systematic literature review Cover

Audiovisual fiction and democracy: A systematic literature review

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. *Adkins, T., & Castle, J. J. (2014). Moving pictures? Experimental evidence of cinematic influence on political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 95(5), 1230–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12070
  2. Aitaki, G. (2018). The private life of a nation in crisis: A study on the politics in/of Greek television fiction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Sweden].
  3. *Aitaki, G. (2019). Laughing with / at the national self: Greek television satire and the politics of self-disparagement. Social Semiotics, 29(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1408893
  4. *Allbritton, D. (2014). Prime risks: The politics of pain and suffering in Spanish crisis cinema. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(1-2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.931663
  5. Al Mansour, H. (Director). (2013). Wadjda [Film]. Razor Film Produktion GmbH; Highlook Communications Group; Rotana Film Production.
  6. Antoniazzi, L., & Bengesser, C. H. (2023). Media-political inroads for Europeanising national cultural public spheres: EU-level obstacles and national public service perspectives. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2043288
  7. *Askanius, T. (2019). Engaging with The Bridge: Cultural citizenship, cross-border identities and audiences as ‘regionauts’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417722093
  8. *Barringer, E. (2020). Origin stories: Wonder woman and sovereign exceptionalism. Contemporary Political Theory, 19(3), 430–452. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00360-w
  9. Bengesser, C. (2023). Public value after the news: A lifeworld-based approach to the legitimation of content universality as contribution to society. In M. Puppis, & C. Ali (Eds.), Public service media’s contribution to society: RIPE@2021 (pp. 47–68). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855756-3
  10. *Bergthaller, H. (2012). A sense of no-place: Avatar and the pitfalls of ecocentric identification. European Journal of English Studies, 16(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2012.703820
  11. Berlant, L. (2009). The intimate public sphere. American Studies: An anthology, 109–118.
  12. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  13. Borah, P. (2016). Media effects theory. The international encyclopedia of political communication. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc156
  14. *Bracke, M. A. (2011). From politics to nostalgia: The transformation of war memories in France during the 1960s–1970s. European History Quarterly, 41(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265691410386423
  15. *Bradfield, S.-J. (2013). Madam & Eve: The politics of race and postcolonial television in South Africa. Television & New Media, 14(6), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912453639
  16. *Bradley, L. (2015). Presenting the German Democratic Republic as a therapeutic state: Alcoholism and the law in Polizeiruf 110. Journal of European Studies, 45(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047244114553766
  17. *Brassard, J. (2012). Bortko’s The Master and Margarita: Adaptation in the service of Vladimir Putin. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 40(3), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2012.697799
  18. *Bulut, E., & Serinkaya Winter, Z. (2023). Contested masculinities and political imaginations in “New Turkey” and Çukur as authoritarian spaces of protection. New Perspectives on Turkey, 68, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.24
  19. *Burki, N. (2020). The gods must be crazy, or the rhetoric of apartheid: A (re)evaluation of Jamie Uys’s film in the context of French anti-apartheid solidarity. Critical Arts, 34(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2019.1684967
  20. *But, E. (2022). Prometheus in Russia: From revolution to dissidence. Classical Receptions Journal, 14(4), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clac015
  21. *Butler, L. D., Koopman, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). The psychological impact of viewing the film “JFK”: Emotions, beliefs, and political behavioral intentions. Political Psychology, 16(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791831
  22. *Cardo, V. (2011). The amazing mrs politician: Television entertainment and women in politics. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq056
  23. *Carter, S., & McCormack, D. P. (2006). Film, geopolitics and the affective logics of intervention. Political Geography, 25(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.11.004
  24. *Ceplair, L. (2018). Ring Lardner, Jr. and the Hollywood blacklist: A new perspective on the perennial struggle against thought control in the United States. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 39(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2018.1484550
  25. *Changsong, W., & Kerry, L. (2022). Filmic depiction of Malay subjectivity in the late Yasmin Ahmad’s films. Sage Open, 12(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221096444
  26. Chaplin, C. (Director). (1940). The great dictator [Film]. Charles Chaplin Productions.
  27. *Chen, D. (2024). Seeing politics through popular culture. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 29(1), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09859-x
  28. *Christensen, C. (2012). Reclaiming the past: On the history-making significance of the Sámi film The Kautokeino Rebellion. Acta Borealia, 29(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2012.678720
  29. Christensen, T., & Haas, P. J. (2005). Projecting politics: Political messages in American film. ME Sharpe.
  30. *Chow, P. S., Waade, A. M., & Saunders, R. A. (2020). Geopolitical television drama within and beyond the Nordic region. Nordicom Review, 41(S1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0013
  31. *Clark, J. S. (2009). Liberating bicentennial America: Imagining the nation through TV superwomen of the seventies. Television & New Media, 10(5), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476409333666
  32. *Coleman, S. (2008). The depiction of politicians and politics in British soaps. Television & New Media, 9(3), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476408315499
  33. *Coletti, R. (2018). The Good Wife’s (geo)politics between originality and stereotypes: A new wine or just a new bottle? Geopolitics, 23(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1294580
  34. *Colleoni, F. (2015). Fanon, violence and rebellion in Italian cinema: The case of Valentino Orsini. Interventions, 17(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2014.992455
  35. *Corner, J., & Richardson, K. (2008). Political culture and television fiction: The Amazing Mrs Pritchard. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549408094979
  36. *Cottle, S. (2022). The Last Picture Show: Reconsidering nostalgia, desire and the real. Journal of American Studies, 56(2), 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875821000530
  37. *Crabtree, C., Darmofal, D., & Kern, H. L. (2015). A spatial analysis of the impact of West German television on protest mobilization during the East German revolution. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314554245
  38. *Cragin, T. (2016). Contested anti-fascisms in Luigi Zampa’s Anni Difficili, 1948–1949. Italian Studies, 71(4), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2016.1222761
  39. *Cummings, S. N. (2009). Soviet rule, nation and film: The Kyrgyz ‘wonder’ years. Nations and Nationalism, 15(4), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2009.00412.x
  40. Dahlgren, P., & Hill, A. (2023). Media engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179481
  41. *Daldal, A. (2007). Ararat and the politics of ‘preserving’ denial. Patterns of Prejudice, 41(5), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220701657245
  42. *Dallmann, A. (2020). “The air of impossibility has been removed”: Realist political drama(dy) and the trope of becoming president. American Studies in Scandinavia, 52(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v52i2.6501
  43. Dalton, R. J., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2011). Overview of political behavior: Political behavior and citizen politics. In R. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp. 320–344). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0017
  44. *Davies, J. (2005). ‘Diversity. America. Leadership. Good over evil’: Hollywood multiculturalism and American imperialism in Independence Day and Three Kings. Patterns of Prejudice, 39(4), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220500347840
  45. *De Groof, M. (2022). Anticolonial aesthetics: Towards eco-cinema. Interventions, 24(7), 1142–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2022.2054007
  46. *Delli-Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (1994). ‘Fictional’ and ‘non-fictional’ television celebrates EARTH day: Or, politics is comedy plus pretense. Cultural Studies, 8(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389400490051
  47. *Dodds, K., & Hochscherf, T. (2020). The geopolitics of Nordic noir: Representations of current threats and vigilantes in contemporary Danish and Norwegian serial drama. Nordicom Review, 41(S1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0015
  48. *Donald, S. H. (2010). Tang Wei: Sex, the city and the scapegoat in Lust, Caution. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(4), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410372238
  49. *Dufournaud, D. (2019). “Our common community”: Third way cultural work in Pleasantville and October Sky. Film Criticism, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/fc.13761232.0043.103
  50. Egoyan, A. (Director). (2002). Ararat [Film]. Alliance Atlantis Communications; Serendipity Point Films; Ego Film Arts.
  51. *Fagan, M. (2017). Who’s afraid of the ecological apocalypse? Climate change and the production of the ethical subject. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116687534
  52. *Ferreira, C. O. (2010). Non-inscription and dictatorship in non-canonical adaptations—A Bee in the Rain (1972) and The Dauphin (2001) by Fernando Lopes. Adaptation, 3(2), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apq007
  53. *Fielding, S. (2014). New labour, ‘Sleaze’ and television drama. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(2), 326–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00538.x
  54. *Frame, G. (2016). “The Real Thing”: Election campaigns and the question of authenticity in American film and television. Journal of American Studies, 50(3), 755–777. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875815000651
  55. *Fuller, S. (2013). “Filmed entirely in Mexico”: Vera Cruz (1954) and the politics of Mexico in American cinema. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 41(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2012.684079
  56. *Gibbs, A. (2021). New television as neo-naturalism: The Wire and The Shield. Canadian Review of American Studies, 51(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-2020-009
  57. *Gilligan, S. (2017). Sun, sex, and style in smart cinema: Tilda Swinton in A Bigger Splash (Luca Guadagnino, 2015). Fashion Theory, 21(6), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2017.1361122
  58. *Gilloch, G. (2017). Noir sans frontiers: Reflections on the transnational flâneur-as-detective. Sociétés, 135(1), 31–42.
  59. Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753
  60. Gripsrud, J. (1998). Cultural studies and intervention in television policy. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754949800100106
  61. *Grossman, J. (2021). What Adaptations and adaptation studies tell us (and sometimes don’t tell us) about politics, culture, and social change. Adaptation, 14(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apaa019
  62. Guadagnino, L. (Director). (2015). A bigger splash [Film]. Frenesy Film Company; Cota Film; Studio Canal.
  63. *Haddu, M. (2015). Political violence and fiction in Mexican film: The case of Carlos Bolado’s Colosio: el asesinato / Colosio: the Assassination (2012). Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 24(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2015.1091299
  64. *Hansen, K. T. (2020). Nordic noir from within and beyond: Negotiating geopolitical regionalisation through SVoD crime narratives. Nordicom Review, 41(S1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0012
  65. Hansen, K. T., & Waade, A. M. (2017). Locating Nordic noir: From Beck to The Bridge. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59815-4
  66. *Hantke, S. (2011). Rebellion of the German seniors: Demographic dystopia as “event television.” Journal of Popular Film and Television, 39(4), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2010.541953
  67. Harding, T. (2022). Culture wars? The (re)politicization of Swedish cultural policy. Cultural Trends, 31(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.1971932
  68. *Harrison, O. C. (2018). Consuming Palestine: Anticapitalism and anticolonialism in Jean-Luc Godard’s Ici et ailleurs. Studies in French Cinema, 18(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14715880.2017.1293773
  69. *Haspel, P. (2010). Agency games in Cold War Washington: Politics and gender in No Way Out. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 38(3), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051003725236
  70. *Haynes, J. (2006). Political critique in Nigerian video films. African Affairs, 105(421), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adi125
  71. *Hayward, K. J., & Hall, S. (2021). Through Scandinavia, darkly: A criminological critique of Nordic noir. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa044
  72. Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford University Press.
  73. *Hermann, E., Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Yan, H. Y. (2023). Television, authoritarianism, and support for Trump: A replication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(2), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad015
  74. *Hiatt, W. (2018). Slapstick diplomacy: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator and Latin American theatres of war. Journal of Latin American Studies, 50(4), 777–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X18000366
  75. Hill, A., & Turnbull, S. (2017). Nordic noir. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.294
  76. Holbert, R. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205279419
  77. *Howell, A. (2019). Breaking silence, bearing witness, and voicing defiance: The resistant female voice in the transmedia storyworld of The Handmaid’s Tale. Continuum, 33(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2019.1569392
  78. *Hutnyk, J. (2018). Screen violence and partition. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 19(4), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2018.1543287
  79. *Huttunen, M. (2017). De-demonising Japan? Transitioning from war to peace through Japan’s cinematic post-war cultural diplomacy in UNESCO’s Orient project 1957–1959. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(6), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2017.1375479
  80. Inthorn, S., Street, J., & Scott, M. (2013). Popular culture as a resource for political engagement. Cultural Sociology, 7(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975512457141
  81. *Ivanova, M. (2021). Dissent as responsibility: Manfred Durniok’s Central European coproductions Mephisto (1981), Taken for a Ride (1983) and Colonel Redl (1985). Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 41(3), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2021.1936979
  82. *Jeong, S. (2013). A global cinematic zone of animal and technology. Angelaki, 18(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2013.783435
  83. *Johnson, T., & Funnell, L. (2022). Nobody does it better: Identity, ideology, and the future of James Bond. Social Science Quarterly, 103(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13139
  84. *Jones, C. W., & Paris, C. (2018). It’s the end of the world and they know it: How dystopian fiction shapes political attitudes. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 969–989. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002153
  85. *Jones, M. (2020). Canadian noir: Consumer culture, colonial nationalism and the Cardinal series. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 56(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqaa021
  86. *Juffer, J. (2003). Dirty diapers and the new organic intellectual. Cultural Studies, 17(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238032000071686
  87. Kamat, N. (Director). (2015). Drishyam [Film]. Panorama Studios; Rajkumar Theaters Private Limited; Viacom Motion Pictures.
  88. *Kato, K. (2015). Australia’s whaling discourse: Global norm, green consciousness and identity. Journal of Australian Studies, 39(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2015.1080176
  89. Kellner, D. (1984). Critical theory and the culture industries: A reassessment. Telos, 62, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.3817/1284062196
  90. *Kern, H. L., & Hainmueller, J. (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpp017
  91. *Khoo, O. (2014). Missing water: Imagination and empathy in Asian Australian ‘boat stories’ on screen. Continuum, 28(5), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.941973
  92. *Korte, B. (2018). ‘I do not like moral horror’: Spooks and the ethical challenge of the secret services in twenty-first century Britain. Journal of British Cinema and Television, 15(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.3366/jbctv.2018.0430
  93. *Koutsourakis, A. (2020). The politics of humour in Kafkaesque cinema: A world-systems approach. Film-Philosophy, 24(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2020.0145
  94. *Kuryla, P. (2009). Parties down at the square amid courtroom melodramas: A reconsideration of the modern civil rights movement demonstration. Patterns of Prejudice, 43(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220802636031
  95. *La Caze, M. (2020). Realism as resistance: The case of Wadjda (2013). Angelaki, 25(5), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2020.1807148
  96. *La Pastina, A. C. (2004). Selling political integrity: Telenovelas, intertextuality, and local elections in rural Brazil. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(2), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4802_8
  97. *Ledesma, E. (2013). Intermediality and Spanish experimental cinema: Text and image interactions in the lyrical films of the Barcelona School. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 14(3), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2013.888259
  98. *Lei, C. P. (2023). Stories about somewhere else: Mobility and ‘spatial others’ in Hong Kong cinema. Asian Studies Review, 48(3), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2023.2244156
  99. *Leiner, D. J., & Neuendorf, N. L. (2022). Does streaming TV change our concept of television? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(1), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.2013221
  100. *Lewis, S. (2019). Border trouble: Ethnopolitics and cosmopolitan memory in recent Polish cinema. East European Politics and Societies, 33(2), 522–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325418815248
  101. *Li, Y. (2020). Melancholic nostalgia, identity crisis, and adaptation in 1950s Hong Kong: Ba Jin’s Family on screen. Adaptation, 13(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apz029
  102. *Linley, M., Reilly, J., & Goldsmith, B. E. (2012). Who’s afraid of the dragon? Asian mass publics’ perceptions of China’s influence. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 13(4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109912000242
  103. *Losada, M. (2012). Pere Portabella’s Umbracle and the Francoist crusade narrative. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 13(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2013.818832
  104. *Marklund, A. (2019). Foreign influences on Nordic (noir) borderlands. European Journal of Scandinavian Studies, 49(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/ejss-2019-0011
  105. McGuigan, J. (2005). The cultural public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549405057827
  106. *Meehan, K., Shaw, I. G. R., & Marston, S. A. (2013). Political geographies of the object. Political Geography, 33, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.11.002
  107. *Millington, R. (2021). Screening dissent: The uprising of 17 June 1953 in East German film. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 41(3), 462–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2021.1936977
  108. *Moffat, K., & Kääpä, P. (2022). Taking the green pill? Keanu Reeves as ‘reluctant eco-celebrity’. Celebrity Studies, 13(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2022.2063401
  109. *Mokkil, N. (2018). Anxieties of seeing: The sensational world of cinema, digital media and politics. BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies, 9(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974927618813478
  110. *Montgomery, F. (2020). Rogue One: A U.S. imperialism story. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 48(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2019.1642841
  111. Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66, 745–758. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349
  112. *Mrozewicz, A. (2020). The landscapes of eco-noir: Reimagining Norwegian eco-exceptionalism in Occupied. Nordicom Review, 41(S1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0018
  113. *Mulligan, K., & Habel, P. (2011). An experimental test of the effects of fictional framing on attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 92(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00758.x
  114. Munro, E. (2014). Feminism: A fourth wave? Political Insight, 4(2), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-9066.12021
  115. Mutz, D. C., & Nir, L. (2010). Not necessarily the news: Does fictional television influence real-world policy preferences? Mass Communication and Society, 13(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430902813856
  116. Neale, S. (1981). Art cinema as institution. Screen, 22(1), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/22.1.11
  117. *Nezirevic, E. (2021). “Pedir un café puede costarte la vida”: Phobias of democracy in Álex de la Iglesia’s El bar. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 22(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2021.1998289
  118. *Nikolaidis, A. (2011). The unexpected prime minister: Politics, class and gender in television fiction. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(2), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq057
  119. *Nilsson, J. (2009). American critic: Satire and political discourse in Warren Beatty’s Bulworth. American Studies in Scandinavia, 41(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v41i2.4577
  120. Nærland, T. U. (2019a). From pleasure to politics: Five functions of watching TV-series for public connection. European Journal of Communication, 35(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119894481
  121. *Nærland, T. U. (2019b). Fictional entertainment and public connection: Audiences and the everyday use of TV-series. Television & New Media, 20(7), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796484
  122. Ohlsson, J. (Ed.). (2023). Mediebarometern 2023 [The media barometer 2023]. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789189864009
  123. Oskamp, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2004). Attitudes and opinions. Psychology Press.
  124. *Pender, A. (2005). The mythical Australian: Barry Humphries, Gough Whitlam and “new nationalism”. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 51(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2005.00361.x
  125. *Pezzotti, B. (2023). Asylum-seeker emergency and third spaces in the Inspector Montalbano TV series. Continuum, 37(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2023.2235094
  126. *Pinedo, I. (2021). The Killing: The gender politics of the Nordic noir crime drama and its American remake. Television & New Media, 22(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419875572
  127. Putnam, R. D. (2015). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In R. T. LeGates, & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader (6th ed.) (pp. 188–196). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748504
  128. *Randall, N. (2011). Imagining the polity: Cinema and television fictions as vernacular theories of British politics. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq054
  129. *Rasul, A., & Raney, A. A. (2021). Learning politics through entertainment: Exploring the effects of biographical films on political learning and attitude toward female politicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65(2), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1928671
  130. *Riabov, O. (2020). The red machine: The dehumanization of the communist enemy in American Cold War cinema. Quaestio Rossica, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.2.479
  131. *Ribke, N. (2021). Netflix and over the top politics? The mechanism TV series and the dynamics of entertainment intervention. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 16(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749602020980139
  132. *Richards, J. (2017). Serializing the political spectrum: Post-9/11 television, from left to right. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 45(3), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2017.1293605
  133. *Ridanpää, J. (2014). ‘Humour is serious’ as a geopolitical speech act: IMDb film reviews of Sacha Baron Cohen’s The Dictator. Geopolitics, 19(1), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2013.829819
  134. *Rudrow, K. J., & Edgar, A. N. (2023). Reading Moonlight, reading the other. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 20(2), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2022.2164319
  135. Sachleben, M., & Yenerall, K. M. (2012). Seeing the bigger picture: American and international politics in film and popular culture. Peter Lang.
  136. *Sand, S. A., & Vordal, T. (2021). ‘Northern, not Nordic noir’: A Norwegian case study on crime series and strategies for transnational television. Journal of Scandinavian Cinema, 11(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1386/jsca_00045_1
  137. Saunders, R. A. (2019a). Small screen IR: A tentative typology of geopolitical television. Geopolitics, 24(3), 691–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1389719
  138. *Saunders, R. A. (2019b). (Profitable) imaginaries of Black power: The popular and political geographies of Black Panther. Political Geography, 69, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.12.010
  139. *Saunders, R. A. (2020). Landscape, geopolitics, and national identity in the Norwegian thrillers Occupied and Nobel. Nordicom Review, 41(S1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0006
  140. *Saunders, R. A., & Bruun, H. (2021). “Radio free Sweden”: Satire, national identity, and the un- PC (geo)politics of Jonatan Spang. Global Society, 35(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1828297
  141. *Scepanski, P. (2019). Retroactive edits: 9/11, Television’s popular archive, and shifting popular memory. Television & New Media, 20(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417751215
  142. *Schulzke, M. (2017). Interpreting and reinterpreting the political significance of popular media: The importance of seeing from a range of perspectives. Political Studies, 65(4), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717693028
  143. *Scott, I., & Thompson, H. (2021). Patriots and protesters, mavericks and manipulators: Assange, Snowden and the politics of surveillance cinema. Journal of American Studies, 55(2), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875819000896
  144. *Setiawan, D. (2017). Post-colonialism from within: Repoliticisation and depoliticisation in Ifa Isfansyah’s adaptation of Ahmad Tohari’s The Dancer. Adaptation, 10(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apw040
  145. *Seymour, N. (2011). “It’s just not turning up”: Cinematic vision and environmental justice in Todd Haynes’s “Safe”. Cinema Journal, 50(4), 26–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41240734
  146. *Shanahan, J. (1998). Television and authoritarianism: Exploring the concept of mainstreaming. Political Communication, 15(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846098198858
  147. *Shen, Q. (2020). Female desire, pop rock, and the Tiananmen generation. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 60(5), 48–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27063814
  148. *Shi, W. (2019). Ten Years and the politics of fear in post-umbrella Hong Kong. Continuum, 33(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2018.1541164
  149. *Siem, J. B. (2023). Analysing the melancholy of Nordic Noir as stimmung: Affective world-building in The Bridge. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 18(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020221095775
  150. Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of mediapolis. Polity Press.
  151. Singer, J. B. (2018). Transmission creep: Media effects theories and journalism studies in a digital era. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1186498
  152. *Smith, E. C. (2020). Madam president: Changing depictions of female presidents in American popular culture. American Studies in Scandinavia, 52(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v52i2.6502
  153. *Steeby, E. (2019). The cult of the American sniper in the age of the imperial security state. Interventions, 21(6), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2019.1628655
  154. *Stein, M. B. (2008). Stasi with a human face? Ambiguity in “Das Leben der Anderen”. German Studies Review, 31(3), 567–579.
  155. *Stein, H. (2021). When ships don’t come ashore – A Yugoslav cinema club production’s dissent in-between the personal and the political. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 41(3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2021.1936982
  156. *St-Georges, C. (2016). Brazilian horrors past and present: José Mojica Marins and politics as reproductive futurism. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 25(4), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2016.1229660
  157. Street, J. (1997). Politics & popular culture. Temple University Press.
  158. Street, J. (2012). Popular culture and political communication. In H. A. Semetko, & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 75–84). Sage.
  159. Stoker G. (2006). Why politics matters: Making democracy work. Palgrave Macmillan.
  160. Stone, O. (Director). (1991). JFK [Film]. Le Studio Canal+; Regency Enterprises; Alcor Films, Ixtlan Corporation.
  161. *Stougaard-Nielsen, J. (2020). Wallander’s dark geopolitics. Nordicom Review, 41(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0014
  162. *Subijanto, R. (2011). The visibility of a pious public. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 12(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2011.554651
  163. *Swigger, N. (2017). The Effect of gender norms in sitcoms on support for access to abortion and contraception. American Politics Research, 45(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X16651615
  164. *Sykes, R. (2021). Imagined Hillarys: Feminism, fantasy, and fictional Clintons in The Good Wife and The Good Fight. Journal of American Studies, 55(2), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875820000729
  165. *Tasker, Y. (2012). Television crime drama and homeland security: From Law & Order to “Terror TV.” Cinema Journal, 51(4), 44–65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cj.2012.0085
  166. *Van Beek, B. (2023). Beyond the split: Re-imagining ‘Belgitude’ in contemporary Belgian cinema. French Screen Studies, 24(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/26438941.2023.2240610
  167. *Van Staden, C. (2017). Watching Hong Kong martial arts film under apartheid. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 29(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2016.1236720
  168. Van Zoonen, L., & Wring, D. (2012). Trends in political television fiction in the UK: Themes, characters and narratives, 1965–2009. Media, Culture & Society, 34(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711433663
  169. *Wang, C. (2015). Memory films and the politics of revisiting: On Amir Muhammad’s films about the communist party of Malaya. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 16(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2015.1003125
  170. *Weedman, C. (2019). A dark exilic vision of 1960s Britain. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 58(3), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2019.0024
  171. *Whyke, T. W., Mugica, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2021). Contemporizing the national style in Chinese animation: The case of Nezha (2019). Animation, 16(3), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/17468477211049354
  172. *Wicks, S., & Kääpä, P. (2023). Post-Nordic-noir landscapes: Competition through localisation in Finnish streaming media. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 18(4), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020221135183
  173. *Wijermars, M. (2016). Memory politics beyond the political domain: Historical legitimation of the power vertical in contemporary Russian television. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1094719
  174. *Wodak, R. (2010). The glocalization of politics in television: Fiction or reality? European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549409352553
  175. *Wu, H. (2017). The translocalized McDull series: National identity and the politics of powerlessness. Animation, 12(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847716686550
  176. *Wu, H. (2020). Imagining the future in post-millennial Hong Kong cinema: Visualizing the local, the national and the global in cultural imaginaries. Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 14(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2020.1733211
  177. *Yea, S. (2015). Girls on film: Affective politics and the creation of an intimate anti-trafficking public in Singapore through film screenings. Political Geography, 45, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.08.009
  178. *Young, K. L., & Carpenter, C. (2018). Does science fiction affect political fact? yes and no: A survey experiment on “Killer Robots”. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy028
  179. *Yuk-wa Law, F. (2017). Fabulating animals–human affinity: Towards an ethics of care in Monster Hunt and Mermaid. Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 11(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2017.1275197
  180. *Zhu, Y. (2016). Corruption and its (dis)content: The rise and fall of Chinese officialdom television dramas. Screen, 57(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjw024
  181. *Åberg, A. W. (2015). Bridges and tunnels: Negotiating the national in transnational television drama. In T. Gustafsson, & P. Kääpä (Eds.), Nordic genre film: Small nation film cultures in the global marketplace (pp. 91–103). Edinburgh University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 83
Published on: May 16, 2025
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Jono Van Belle, Georgia Aitaki, Maria Jansson, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.