Lighting the participatory spark? The role of social media influencers in initiating political participation
References
- Abidin, C. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness.
Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology ,8 , 1–18. https://hdl.handle.net/1794/26365 - Abidin, C., Xu, J., & Hutchinson, J. (2023). Influencer regulations, governance and sociocultural issues in Asia.
Policy and Internet . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.340 - Arnesson, J. (2023). Influencers as ideological intermediaries: Promotional politics and authenticity labour in influencer collaborations.
Media, Culture & Society ,45 (3), 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221117505 - Arnesson, J. (2024). ‘Endorsing a dictatorship and getting paid for it’: Discursive struggles over intimacy and authenticity in the politicisation of influencer collaborations.
New Media & Society ,26 (3), 1467–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211064302 - Ashton, D., & Patel, K. (2018). Vlogging careers: Everyday expertise, collaboration and authenticity. In S. Taylor, & S. Luckman (Eds.),
The new normal of working lives: Critical studies in contemporary work and employment (pp. 147–169). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66038-7_8 - Bause, H. (2021). Politische Social-Media-Influencer als Meinungsführer?
Publizistik [Political social media influencers as opinion leaders?],66 (2), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-021-00666-z - Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research.
Information, Communication and Society ,18 , 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542 - Chen, K.-J., Lin, J.-S., & Shan, Y. (2021). Influencer marketing in China: The roles of parasocial identification, consumer engagement, and inferences of manipulative intent.
Journal of Consumer Behaviour ,20 (6), 1436–1448. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1945 - Cheng, Z., Chen, J., Peng, R. X., & Shoenberger, H. (2024). Social media influencers talk about politics: Investigating the role of source factors and PSR in Gen-Z followers’ perceived information quality, receptivity and sharing intention.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics ,21 (2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2173700 - Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Basic social influence is underestimated.
Psychological Inquiry ,16 (4), 158–161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20447283 - Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram.
New Media & Society ,21 (4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684 - Dekoninck, H., & Schmuck, D. (2022). The mobilizing power of influencers for pro-environmental behavior intentions and political participation.
Environmental Communication ,16 (4), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2027801 - Dekoninck, H., & Schmuck, D. (2023). The “greenfluence”: Following environmental influencers, parasocial relationships, and youth’s participation behavior.
New Media & Society ,26 (11), 6615–6635. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231156131 - Delisle, M.-P., & Parmentier, M.-A. (2016). Navigating person-branding in the fashion blogosphere.
Journal of Global Fashion Marketing ,7 (3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2016.1167619 - Dhanesh, G. S., & Duthler, G. (2019). Relationship management through social media influencers: Effects of followers’ awareness of paid endorsement.
Public Relations Review ,45 (3), 101765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.03.002 - Duffy, B. E. (2018).
(Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work . Yale University Press. - Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology.
Human Affairs ,22 , 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1 - Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline?
The Journal of Politics ,75 (3), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431 - Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation.
Journal of Information Technology and Politics ,7 (1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903316742 - Gonzalez, A., Schmuck, D., & Vandenbosch, L. (2023). Posting and framing politics: A content analysis of celebrities’, athletes’, and influencers’ Instagram political content.
Information, Communication & Society ,27 (8), 1605–1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2285495 - Goodwin, A. M., Joseff, K., Riedl, M., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. C. (2023). Political relational influencers: The mobilization of social media influencers in the political arena.
International Journal of Communication ,17 , 1613–1633. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18987 - Graham, T. (2008). Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums.
Javnost - The Public ,15 (2), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2008.11008968 - Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Wright, S. (2015). From everyday conversation to political action: Talking austerity in online ‘third spaces’.
European Journal of Communication ,30 (6), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115595529 - Harff, D., & Schmuck, D. (2024a). Is authenticity key? Mobilization by social media influencers versus celebrities and young people’s political participation.
Psychology & Marketing ,41 (11), 2757–2771. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22082 - Harff, D., & Schmuck, D. (2024b). Prevalence, presentation, and popularity of political topics in social media influencers’ content across two countries.
Political Communication , 1–31. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2406809 - Harff, D., & Schmuck, D. (2024c). Who relies on social media influencers for political information? A cross-country study among youth.
The International Journal of Press/Politics . OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241234898 - Hayes, A. (2018).
Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis – A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press. - Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?
European Journal of Communication ,28 (1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112465369 - Hudders, L., Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2020). The commercialization of social media stars: A literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers.
International Journal of Advertising ,40 (3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925 - Hurst, A. (2016).
The purpose economy: How your desire for impact, personal growth and community is changing the world . Elevate. - Kapitan, S., van Esch, P., Soma, V., & Kietzmann, J. (2021). Influencer marketing and authenticity in content creation.
Australasian Marketing Journal ,30 (4), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211011171 - Karvonen, L. (2014).
The personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies . ECPR press. - Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers.
Celebrity Studies ,8 (2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292 - Kostelka, F., & Blais, A. (2021). The generational and institutional sources of the global decline in voter turnout.
World Politics ,73 (4), 629–667. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000149 - Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions.
Journal of Business Research ,69 (12), 5753–5760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 - Lee, S. S., & Johnson, B. K. (2021). Are they being authentic? The effects of self-disclosure and message sidedness on sponsored post effectiveness.
International Journal of Advertising ,41 (1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1986257 - Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. D. P. (2021). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust.
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice ,30 (3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275 - Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media.
Journal of Interactive Advertising ,19 (1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 - Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”: The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements.
Computers in Human Behavior ,93 , 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014 - Munson, S., & Resnick, P. (2011). The prevalence of political discourse in non-political blogs.
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media ,5 (1), 233–240. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14133 - Naderer, B. (2023). Influencers as political agents? The potential of an unlikely source to motivate political action.
Communications ,48 (1), 93–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2021-0006 - News media online [Uutismedia verkossa]. (2020).
Reuters institute digital news report, country report Finland [Reuters-instituutin Digital News Report, Suomen maaraportti ]. Tampere Research Center for Journalism, Media, and Communication. https://www.mediaalantutkimussaatio.fi/wp-content/uploads/Reuters-Uutismedia-verkossa_raportti-Suomi_2020.pdf - Norris, P. (1999). Who surfs? New technology, old voters and virtual democracy. In E. C. Kamarck, & J. Nye (Eds.),
Democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 71–94). Hollis Press. - Pöyry, E., & Reinikainen, H. (2024). “Remember to vote!” How do people respond to social media influencers promoting political participation? In J. Arnesson, & H. Reinikainen (Eds.),
Influencer politics – At the intersection of personal, political, and promotional (pp. 35–50). De Gruyter. - Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’ – Parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing.
Journal of Marketing Management ,36 (3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781 - Renström, E. A., Aspernäs, J., & Bäck, H. (2021). The young protester: The impact of belongingness needs on political engagement.
Journal of Youth Studies ,24 (6), 781–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1768229 - Riedl, M., Schwemmer, C., Ziewiecki, S., & Ross, L. M. (2021). The rise of political influencers: Perspectives on a trend towards meaningful content.
Frontiers in Communication ,6 , Article 752656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.752656 - Riedl, M. J., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. C. (2023). Political influencers on social media: An introduction.
Social Media + Society ,9 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177938 - Schmuck, D., Hirsch, M., Stevic, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). Politics – simply explained? How influencers affect youth’s perceived simplification of politics, political cynicism, and political interest.
The International Journal of Press/Politics ,27 (3), 738–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221088987 - Sehl, A., & Schützeneder, J. (2023). Political knowledge to go: An analysis of selected political influencers and their formats in the context of the 2021 German federal election.
Social Media + Society ,9 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177916 - Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions.
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ,53 , 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011 - Suuronen, A., Reinikainen, H., Borchers, N. S., & Strandberg, K. (2022). When social media influencers go political: An exploratory analysis on the emergence of political topics among Finnish influencers.
Javnost - The Public ,29 (3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1983367 - van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, . . . gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe.
European Journal of Political Research ,51 (1) 24–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x - van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2021). Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers.
Convergence ,27 (1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136 - van Zoonen, L. (2005).
Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge . Rowman & Littlefield. - Vikøren Andersen, I., & Eriksson Krutrök, M. (2024). Greenfluencers and environmental advocacy: Sustainability representations and appeals to action in content by Scandinavian influencers. In J. Arnesson, & H. Reinikainen (Eds.),
Influencer politics: At the intersection of personal, political, and promotional (pp. 105–120). De Gruyter. - Wasike, B. (2023). I am an influencer and I approve this message! Examining how political social media influencers affect political interest, political trust, political efficacy, and political participation.
International Journal of Communication ,17 , 3110–3132. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20293 - Widholm, A., & Ekman, M. (2024). Democracy and digital disintegration: Platforms, actors, citizens.
Nordicom Review ,45 (S1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0005 - Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2017). Social media and political disengagement among young adults: A moderated mediation model of cynicism, efficacy, and social media use on apathy.
Mass Communication & Society ,20 (2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1224352
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 54
Published on: Mar 29, 2025
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Hanna Reinikainen, Nils S. Borchers, Aleksi Suuronen, Kim Strandberg, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.