Ala-Fossi, M. (2020). Finland: Media welfare state in the digital era? Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00020_1
Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1493–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20857
Bennett, W. L. (2014). Press–government relations in a changing media environment. In K. Kenski, & K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 249–262). Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.40
Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
Brown, J. D., Bybee, C. R., Wearden, S. T., & Straughn, D. M. (1987). Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400106
DeIuliis, D. (2015). Gatekeeping theory from social fields to social networks. Communication Research Trends, 34(1), 1–23. http://cscc.scu.edu/trends/v34/CRT_v34_n1_March2015.pdf
Dunwoody, S. (1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59–79). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1993). The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70(4), 793–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000405
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., & Watts, D. J. (2016). The structural virality of online diffusion. Management Science, 62(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
Herkman, J. (2009). The structural transformation of the democratic corporatist model: The Case of Finland. Javnost – The Public, 16(4), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2009.11009015
Janicki, M., Kanner, A., & Mäkelä, E. (2023). Detection and attribution of quotes in Finnish news media: BERT vs. rule-based approach. In Proceedings of the 24th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NoDaLiDa) (pp. 52–59). NEALT Proceedings Series. University of Tartu Library.
Kantola, A. (2013). From gardeners to revolutionaries: The rise of the liquid ethos in political journalism. Journalism, 14(5), 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912454504
Karlsson, M., Van Couvering, E., & Lindell, J. (2022). Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform era. Nordicom Review, 43(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012
Koivunen, A., Kanner, A., Janicki, M., Harju, A., Hokkanen, J., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Emotive, evaluative, epistemic: A linguistic analysis of affectivity in news journalism. Journalism, 22(5), 1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985724
Koivunen, A., & Vuorelma, J. (2022). Trust and authority in the age of mediatised politics. European Journal of Communication, 37(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072653
Koljonen, K. (2013). The shift from high to liquid ideals: Making sense of journalism and its change through a multidimensional model. Nordicom Review, 34(S1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0110
Kunelius, R., & Reunanen, E. (2012). Media in political power: A parsonian view on the differentiated mediatization of Finnish decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211424207
Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412
Maurer, P., & Beiler, M. (2018). Networking and political alignment as strategies to control the news. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2024–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1310627
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2022). Reuters Institute digital news report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022
Reich, Z. (2006). The process model of news initiative: Sources lead first, reporters thereafter. Journalism Studies, 7(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600757928
Reunanen, E., Kunelius, R., & Noppari, E. (2010). Mediatization in context: Consensus culture, media and decision making in the 21st century, the case of Finland. Communications, 35(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.016
Richardson, J. (2006). Who gets to speak? A study of sources in the broadsheet press. In E. Poole, & J. Richardson (Eds.). Muslims and the news media (pp. 103–115). I. B. Tauris.
Seuri, O., Era, R., Koivunen, A., Janicki, M., Toivanen, P., Hokkanen, J., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Uutisvuon hallitsija: Uutismedia kiky-kamppailussa 2015–2016 [Ruler of the news flow: Traditional media in the competitiveness pact negotiations 2015–2016]. Politiikka, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.37452/politiikka.99432
Skogerbø, E., Bruns, A., Quodling, A., & Ingebretsen, T. (2016). Agenda-setting revisited: Social media in mainstream journalism. In G. Enli, A. Bruns, A. O. Larsson, E. Skogerbo, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 104–120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299
Syvertsen, T., Gunn, E., Mjøs, O., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
Thorson K., & Wells, C. (2015). How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. In T. P. Vos, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 25–44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849652
Tiffen, R., Jones, P. K., Rowe, D., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rojas, H., & Soroka, S. (2014). Sources in the news: A comparative study. Journalism studies, 15(4), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.831239
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
Vesa, J., & Kantola, A. (2016). Kuka pääsee mukaan? Miten järjestöjen ääni kuuluu lakien valmistelussa [Who can join? How the voice of organisations is heard in the preparation of laws]. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 59/2016 [Government investigation and research publication series 59/2016.]. Prime Minister’s Office Finland.
Vesa, J., Kantola, A., & Binderkrantz, A. (2018). A stronghold of routine corporatism? The involvement of interest groups in policy making in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(4), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12128
Vos, T. P. (2015). Revisiting gatekeeping theory during a time of transition. In T. P. Vos, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 3–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849652
Väliverronen, J. (2022a). Boundaries in motion? Finnish political journalists’ external and internal boundary work in a time of change. Journalism Studies, 23(9), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2065340
Väliverronen, J. (2022b). Political journalism content in a new era: The case of Finnish newspapers, 1995–2015. European Journal of Communication, 37(4), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072662
Weaver, D., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Who sets the agenda for the media? A study of local agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly, 62(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200113
Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2004). Monica and Bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gatekeeping and agenda setting in the new media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(9), 1208–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642032623