Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Democracy and digital disintegration: Platforms, actors, citizens Cover

Democracy and digital disintegration: Platforms, actors, citizens

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220153
  2. Barnoy, A., & Reich, Z. (2021). The familiarity paradox: Why has digital sourcing not democratized the news? Digital Journalism, 11(6), 1084–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1937254
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760
  4. Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (Eds.). (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
  6. Chadwick, A., Dennis, J., & Smith, A. P. (2015). Politics in the age of hybrid media: Power, systems, and media logics. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 7–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299
  7. Chambers, S. (2018). Reasonable democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Cornell University Press.
  8. Christians, C. G., Glasser, T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2010). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.
  9. Cushion, S. (2023). Beyond Mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Taylor & Francis.
  10. Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. European Journal of Communication, 34(6), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119886151
  11. Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2022). Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communication. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136940
  12. Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2023). Media criticism as a propaganda strategy in political communication. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 5(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2023-0007
  13. Engesser. S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
  14. Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
  15. Galtung, J. (1996). On the social costs of modernization: Social disintegration, atomie/anomie and social development. Development and Change, 27(2), 379–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00596.x
  16. Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture and Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
  17. Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
  18. Hase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1499–1520.
  19. Heft, A., Mayerhöffer, E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219
  20. Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
  21. Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Digital transformations of the public arena. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009064484
  22. Kaiser, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2019). Integrating concepts of counterpublics into generalised public sphere frameworks: Contemporary transformations in radical forms. Javnost – The Public, 26(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1558676
  23. Kefford, G., Dommett, K., Baldwin-Philippi, J., Bannerman, S., Dobber, T., Kruschinski, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Rzepecki, E. (2022). Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies. Party Politics, 29(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039
  24. Kossowska, M., Kłodkowski, P., Siewierska-Chmaj, A., Guinote, A., Kessels, U., Moyano, M., & Strömbäck, J. (2023). Internet-based micro-identities as a driver of societal disintegration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02441-z
  25. Krzyżanowski, M., Ekman, M., Nilsson, P. E., Gardell, M., & Christensen, C. (2021). Uncivility, racism, and populism: Discourses and interactive practices in anti- & post-democratic communication. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003
  26. Krämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices: The function of the internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
  27. Larsson, A. O. (2020). Right-wingers on the rise online: Insights from the 2018 Swedish elections. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2108–2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887700
  28. Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412
  29. Lee, E. J., & Tandoc Jr., E. C. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123
  30. Lischka, J. A., & Messerli, M. (2016). Examining the benefits of audience integration: Does sharing of or commenting on online news enhance the loyalty of online readers? Digital Journalism, 4(5), 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1068128
  31. Maurer, P. (2022). Populism and social media. In A. Ceron (Ed.), Encyclopedia of technology & politics (pp. 37–42). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374263.populism.social.media
  32. Mayerhöffer, E., & Schwartz, S. A. (2020). Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or partisan: Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]. In S. N. Just, & T. Gulbrandsen (Eds.), FV19: Politisk kommunikation på digitale medier [FV19: Political communication on digital media] (pp. 203–226). Samfundslitteratur.
  33. Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
  34. Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023). Comparing the platformization of news media systems: A cross-country analysis. European Journal of Communication, 38(5), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231189
  35. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
  36. Perloff, R. M. (2022) The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
  37. Picha Edwardsson, M., Al-Saqaf, W., & Nygren, G. (2023). Verification of digital sources in Swedish newsrooms: A technical issue or a question of newsroom culture? Journalism Practice, 17(8), 1678–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2004200
  38. Powers, E., Koliska, M., & Guha, P. (2019). ‘Shouting matches and echo chambers’: Perceived identity threats and political self-censorship on social media. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3630–3649.
  39. Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (2017). Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 12–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
  40. Schwartz, S. A., Nelimarkka, M., & Larsson, A. O. (2022). Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist parties. Information, Communication & Society, 26(16), 3220–3238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397
  41. Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015). User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 798–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268
  42. Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950
  43. Strömbäck, J. (2023). Political alternative media as a democratic challenge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2178947
  44. Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). Strategic political communication in election campaigns. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 109–128). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238174
  45. Susen, S. (2017). Jürgen Habermas: Between democratic deliberation and deliberative democracy. In R. Wodak, & B. Forchtner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 43–66). Routledge.
  46. Van Leuven, S., Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., & Hermans, L. (2018). Online and newsworthy. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1498747
  47. Veneti, A., Lilleker, D. G., & Jackson, D. (2022). Between analogue and digital: A critical exploration of strategic social media use in Greek election campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1913689
  48. Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648
  49. Wang, S. (2021). Moderating uncivil user comments by humans or machines? The effects of moderation agent on perceptions of bias and credibility in news content. Digital Journalism, 9(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1851279
  50. Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x
  51. Volkmer, I. (2003). The global network society and the global public sphere. Development, 46, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1011637003046001566
  52. Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Published on: Mar 12, 2024
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Andreas Widholm, Mattias Ekman, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.