Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What are the connections between collaboration values and communication practices? An investigation exploring collaborators’ perceptions of supports and constraints in collaboration practice
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod [Interpretation and reflections: Philosophy of science and qualitative method]. Studentlitteratur.
Andersson, I., & James, L. (2018). Altruism or entrepreneurialism? The co-evolution of green place branding and policy tourism in Växjö, Sweden. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3437–3453. https://doi.org/10.1177/004209801774947
Axley, S. (1984). Managerial communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/258283
Bencherki, N., & Cooren, F. (2011). Having to be: The possessive constitution of organization. Human Relations, 64(12), 1579–1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711424227
Berglez, P., & Hedenmo, O. (2023). The mediatedness of interorganizational collaboration: How collaboration materializes through affordances, chains, and switches. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231187335
Brülde, B., & Duus-Otterström, G. (2015). Klimatetik: rättvisa, politik och individens ansvar [Climate ethics: Justice, politics and individual responsibility]. Thales.
Brummans, B. H. J. M., Putnam, L. L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750801952735
Chen, B. (2008). Assessing interorganizational networks for public service delivery: A process-perceived effectiveness framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576310302
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2015). The polyphony of values and the value of polyphony. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 8(1), 9–25. http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/262/335
Cooper, K. R. (2021). ‘For everyone’, means ‘for no one’: Tensions in community collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(3), 392–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08933189211000324
Ekström, M., & Larsson, L. (2019). Kvalitativa intervjuer [Qualitative interviews]. In M. Ekström, & B. Johansson (Eds.), Metoder i medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap [Methods in media and communication science]. Studentlitteratur.
Fenton, P., Gustafssson, S., Ivner, J., & Palm, J. (2016). Stakeholder participation in municipal energy and climate planning – experiences from Sweden. Local Environment, 21(3), 272–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.946400
Fu, J. S., Cooper, K. R., & Shumate, M. (2019). Use and affordances of ICTs in interorganizational collaboration: An exploratory study of ICTs in nonprofit partnerships. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918824041
Granberg, M., & Elander, I. (2007). Local governance and climate change: Reflections on the Swedish experience. Local Environment, 12(5), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830701656911
Green, M., Leonard, R., & Malkin, S. (2018). Organisational responses to climate change: Do collaborative forums make a difference? Geographical Research, 56(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12286
Gustafsson, S., & Mignon, I. (2019). Municipalities as intermediaries for the design and local implementation of climate visions. European Planning Studies, 28(6), 1161–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1612327
Gustavsson, E. (2008). Mellan det lokala och det globala – klimat, kommuner och nätverk [Between the local and the global: climate, local governments, networks] [Doctoral Thesis, Örebro University, Sweden].
Gustavsson, E., Elander, I., & Lundmark, M. (2009). Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation: Two Swedish examples. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1068/c07109j
Hall, P. (2020). Mötesplats Sverige: svensk innovationspolitik under hundra år [Meeting point Sweden: 100 years of Swedish innovation policies]. Studentlitteratur.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In W. Lovitt (Trans.) The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3–35). Harper & Row.
Jagers Harring, N., Löfgren, Å., Sjöstedt, M., Alpizar, F., Brülde, B., Langlet, D., Nilsson, A., Carney Almroth, B., Dupont, S., & Steffen, W. (2020). On the preconditions for large-scale collective action. Ambio, 49, 1282–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01284-w
Kasa, S., Dotterud Leiren, M., & Khan, J. (2012). Central government ambitions and local commitment: Climate mitigation initiatives in four municipalities in Norway and Sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.589649
Koschmann, M. A. (2016). The communicative accomplishment of collaboration failure. Journal of Communication, 66, 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12233
Koschmann, M. A. (2020). Collabrocation: Thinking communicatively about collaboration. In M. A. Koschmann, & M. L. Sanders (Eds.), Understanding nonprofit work – A communication perspective (pp. 77–108). Wiley-Blackwell.
Koschmann, M. (2022). Civil society collaboration and inter-organizational relationships. In J. Basque, N. Bencherki, & T. Kuhn (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the communicative constitution of organization (pp. 395–408). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003224914
Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0314
Koschmann, M., Kopczynski, J., Opdyke, A., & Javernick-Will, A. (2017). Constructing authority in disaster relief coordination. Electronic Journal of Communication, 27(3–4).
Kramer, M. W, Hoelscher, C. S., Nguyen, C., Day, E. A., & Cooper, O. D. (2017). Structuration processer in an interagency collaboration: Enabling and constraining participation and efficiency. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1355558
Lewis, L. K. (2006). Collaborative interaction: Review of communication scholarship and a research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 197–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2006.11679058
Liljenfeldt, J., & Keskitalo, C. (2011). Regionala och kommunala mål för hållbarhetsarbete i Umeåregionen [Regional and municipal goals for sustainability work in the Umeå region]. CERUM Report Nr 28/2011.
Lober, D. J. (1997). Explaining the formation of business-environmentalist collaborations: Collaborative windows and the paper task force. Policy Sciences, 30, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004201611394
Lundberg, M. (2005). Meningsskapande om hållbarhet? [Making sense of sustainability?] In J. Olsson (Ed.), Hållbar utveckling underifrån? Lokala politiska processer och etiska vägval [Sustainable development from below? Local political processes and ethical path choices] (pp. 137–152). Nya Doxa.
Mert, J. (2009). Partnerships for sustainable development as discursive practice: Shifts in discourses of environment and democracy. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.003
Pinske, J., & Kolk, A. (2012). Addressing the climate change-sustainable development nexus: The role of multistakeholder partnerships. Business & Society, 51(1), 176–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503114274
Porter, A. J., Kuhn, T. R., & Nerlich, B. (2018). Organizing authority in the climate change debate: IPCC controversies and the management of dialectical tensions. Organization Studies, 39(7), 873–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084061770799
Sami, N. (2018). Multi-level climate change planning: Scale, capacity and the ability for local action. In S. Moloney, H. Fünfgeld, & M. Granberg (Eds.), Local action on climate change: Opportunities and constraints (pp. 92–110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315174815
Schoeneborn, D., & Vásquez, C. (2017). Communicative constitution of organizations. In C. R. Scott, & L. K. Lewis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567
Seitanidi, M. M., Koufopoulos, D. N., & Palmer, P. (2010). Partnership formation for change: Indicators for transformative potential in cross sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 139–161. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29789690
Statskontoret. (2022, January 19). Regeringens styrning i tvärsektoriella frågor: En studie om erfarenhet och utvecklingsmöjligheter [Government governance in cross-sectoral issues: A study of experience and development opportunities]. http://tinyurl.com/3tmjrwty
Stibbe, D. T., Reid, S., & Gilbert, J. (2018). Maximising the impact of partnerships for the SDGs. A practical guide to partnership value creation. UN: The Partnering Initiative and UN DESA. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=2564&menu=35
Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602275
Thoresson, J., Tengvard, M., & Palm, J. (2010). Regionala klimat och energistrategier i Skåne och Västra Götalands län: Planering, aktörer, och samverkan [Regional climate and energy strategies in Skåne and Västra Götaland counties: Planning, actors, and collaboration]. Arbetsnotat, 344. Linköping University Electronic Press. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-60920
United Nations. (2022, July 18). Multilateral efforts needed to reverse climate crisis, secretary-general says, stressing choice between ‘collective action or collective suicide’. https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21376.doc.htm.
Vásquez, C., Bencherki, N., Cooren, F., & Sergi, V. (2018). From ‘matters of concern’ to ‘matters of authority’; Studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach. Long Range Planning, 51(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.01.001
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Coping with problems of understanding in interorganizational relationships: using formalization as a means to make sense. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1617–1638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068338
Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. E. (2019). Collaboration in environmental conflict management and decision-making: Comparing best practices with insights from collaborative learning work. Frontiers in Communication, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00002
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Wikström, G. (2021). Politiskt feltänk kring genomförande av Agenda 2030 [Political misconceptions regarding the implementation of Agenda 2030]. Dagens Samhälle. https://www.dagenssamhalle.se/opinion/debatt/gabriel-wikstrom-politiskt-feltank-kring-genomforandet-av-agenda-2030/
Wretling, V., & Balfors, B. (2021). Building institutional capacity to plan for climate neutrality: The role of local co-operation and inter-municipal networks at the regional level. Sustainability, 13(2173). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13042173