References
- Anggraeni, E., den Hartigh, E., & Zegveld, M. A. (2007). Business ecosystem as a perspective for studying the relations between firms and their business networks. In F. M. van Eijnatten, & J. Peters (Eds.), Phase transitions in organisations (pp. 1–21). TVA.
- Argylis, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. A. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1998). Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298
- Darsø, L. (2019). Innovationspædagogik: Kunsten at fremelske innovationskompetence [Innovation pedagogy: The art of liberal innovation competence]. Samfundslitteratur.
- D'Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, S. (2013). Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs010
- Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
- EU Commission. (2021). Horizon 2020 work programme 2018–2020: General annexes. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/wp/2018-2020/annexes/h2020-wp1820-annex-d-ia_en.pdf
- Fang, L. (2015). Do clusters encourage innovation? A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215589848
- Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
- Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853
- Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Sage.
- Grubenmann, S. (2016). Action research. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093274
- Halvorsen, K., & Stjernø, S. (2008). Work, oil and welfare: The welfare state in Norway. Scandinavian University Press.
- Holbrook, J. B. (2013). What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration. Synthese, 190(11), 1865–1879. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41932109
- Jahn T., Bergmann M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
- Järvinen P. (2007). Action research is similar to design science. Quality & Quantity, 41(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5427-1
- Klein, J. T. (2012). Research integration: A comparative knowledge base. In A. F. Repko, W. H. Newell, & R. Szostak (Eds.), Case studies in interdisciplinary research (pp. 283–298). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483349541.n10
- Kleis Nielsen, R. (2021). NiemanLab predictions for journalism 2022: Invest in tools and talent, and news-rooms can finish the job. NiemanLab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/12/invest-in-tools-and-talent-and-newsrooms-can-finish-the-job
- Latour B. (1998). From the world of science to the world of research? Science, 280(5361), 208–209. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5361.208
- Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Brown, A., Brock, G., Nyre, L., Tonheim, A., Apostolou, D., & Evans, J. (2018, April 21–26). Making the news: Digital creativity support for journalists. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, paper 475, 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174049
- Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Brown, A., Nyre, L., Holm, B., Tonheim, A., Hesseling, C., Wagemans, A., & Apostolou, D. (2019, June 23–26). Evaluating the use of digital creativity support by journalists in newsrooms. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, San Diego, USA, 222–232. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325484
- Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Brown, A., Apostolou, D., Holm, B., Nyre, L., Tonheim, A., & van den Beld, A. (2020). Digital creativity support for original journalism. Communications of the ACM, 63(8), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386526
- Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Franks, S., Wells, R., & Stallard, S. (2020, October 25–29). Designing digital content to support science journalism. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Tallinn, Estonia, paper 80, 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420124
- MedieNorge. (2022). Antall aviser og samlet opplag [Number of newspapers and total circulation]. Retrieved August 18, 2022, from https://medienorge.uib.no/statistikk/medium/avis/361
- Michalsen, G. (2018, April 13). I 71 år har Raumnes klart seg selv i kampen for bygda. Men nå trenger lokalavisene hjelp utenfra for å henge med digitalt [For 71 years, Raumnes has held its own in the fight for the village. But now the local newspapers need outside help to keep up digitally]. Medier24. https://m24.no/agderposten-fred-gjestad-lla/i-71-ar-har-raumnes-klart-seg-selv-i-kampen-for-bygdamen-na-trenger-lokalavisene-hjelp-utenfra-for-a-henge-med-digitalt/181585
- Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition
- Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership & strategy in the age of business ecosystems. HarperBusiness.
- Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0605100103
- Nyre, L. (2022, February 13). Rapport frå prosjektet “automatiserte nyheiter” [Report from the “automated news” project]. TekLab. https://teklab.uib.no/artikler/rapport-fra-prosjektet-automatiserte-nyheiter/
- Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
- Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
- von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp, & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer [Assessing the consequences of technology teaching: The educational potential of transdisciplinarity]. Vs Verlag.
- Wagemans, A., & Witschge, T. (2019). Examining innovation as process: Action research in journalism studies. Convergence, 25(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519834880