Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can action research improve local journalism? Cover

Can action research improve local journalism?

Nordicom Review
Volume 43 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)
By: Lars Nyre and  Neil Maiden  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. Anggraeni, E., den Hartigh, E., & Zegveld, M. A. (2007). Business ecosystem as a perspective for studying the relations between firms and their business networks. In F. M. van Eijnatten, & J. Peters (Eds.), Phase transitions in organisations (pp. 1–21). TVA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Argylis, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. A. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1998). Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Darsø, L. (2019). Innovationspædagogik: Kunsten at fremelske innovationskompetence [Innovation pedagogy: The art of liberal innovation competence]. Samfundslitteratur.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. D'Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, S. (2013). Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. EU Commission. (2021). Horizon 2020 work programme 2018–2020: General annexes. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/wp/2018-2020/annexes/h2020-wp1820-annex-d-ia_en.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Fang, L. (2015). Do clusters encourage innovation? A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215589848
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Sage.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Grubenmann, S. (2016). Action research. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093274
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Halvorsen, K., & Stjernø, S. (2008). Work, oil and welfare: The welfare state in Norway. Scandinavian University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Holbrook, J. B. (2013). What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration. Synthese, 190(11), 1865–1879. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41932109
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Jahn T., Bergmann M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Järvinen P. (2007). Action research is similar to design science. Quality & Quantity, 41(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5427-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Klein, J. T. (2012). Research integration: A comparative knowledge base. In A. F. Repko, W. H. Newell, & R. Szostak (Eds.), Case studies in interdisciplinary research (pp. 283–298). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483349541.n10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Kleis Nielsen, R. (2021). NiemanLab predictions for journalism 2022: Invest in tools and talent, and news-rooms can finish the job. NiemanLab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/12/invest-in-tools-and-talent-and-newsrooms-can-finish-the-job
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Latour B. (1998). From the world of science to the world of research? Science, 280(5361), 208–209. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5361.208
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Brown, A., Brock, G., Nyre, L., Tonheim, A., Apostolou, D., & Evans, J. (2018, April 21–26). Making the news: Digital creativity support for journalists. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, paper 475, 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Brown, A., Nyre, L., Holm, B., Tonheim, A., Hesseling, C., Wagemans, A., & Apostolou, D. (2019, June 23–26). Evaluating the use of digital creativity support by journalists in newsrooms. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, San Diego, USA, 222–232. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325484
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Brown, A., Apostolou, D., Holm, B., Nyre, L., Tonheim, A., & van den Beld, A. (2020). Digital creativity support for original journalism. Communications of the ACM, 63(8), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386526
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Franks, S., Wells, R., & Stallard, S. (2020, October 25–29). Designing digital content to support science journalism. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Tallinn, Estonia, paper 80, 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420124
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. MedieNorge. (2022). Antall aviser og samlet opplag [Number of newspapers and total circulation]. Retrieved August 18, 2022, from https://medienorge.uib.no/statistikk/medium/avis/361
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Michalsen, G. (2018, April 13). I 71 år har Raumnes klart seg selv i kampen for bygda. Men nå trenger lokalavisene hjelp utenfra for å henge med digitalt [For 71 years, Raumnes has held its own in the fight for the village. But now the local newspapers need outside help to keep up digitally]. Medier24. https://m24.no/agderposten-fred-gjestad-lla/i-71-ar-har-raumnes-klart-seg-selv-i-kampen-for-bygdamen-na-trenger-lokalavisene-hjelp-utenfra-for-a-henge-med-digitalt/181585
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership & strategy in the age of business ecosystems. HarperBusiness.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0605100103
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Nyre, L. (2022, February 13). Rapport frå prosjektet “automatiserte nyheiter” [Report from the “automated news” project]. TekLab. https://teklab.uib.no/artikler/rapport-fra-prosjektet-automatiserte-nyheiter/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp, & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer [Assessing the consequences of technology teaching: The educational potential of transdisciplinarity]. Vs Verlag.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Wagemans, A., & Witschge, T. (2019). Examining innovation as process: Action research in journalism studies. Convergence, 25(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519834880
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 171 - 189
Published on: Oct 8, 2022
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
action research,
business ecosystem,
EU Innovation Action,
local newspapers,
innovation competence
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Communication science,
Mass communication,
Public and political communication

© 2022 Lars Nyre, Neil Maiden, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 43 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)Next article