Media narratives, agonistic deliberation, and Skam: An analysis of how young people communicate in digital spaces
By:
References
- Aarvik, S. (2018). Sanas islam [Sana’s Islam]. In S. S. Lindtner, & D. Skarstein (Eds.), Dramaserien Skam: Analytiske perspektiver og didaktiske muligheter [The drama series Skam: Analytical perspectives and didactic possibilities] (pp. 111–131). Fagbokforlaget.
- Andem, J. (Scriptwriter & Director). (2016, May 19). Trussel [Threat] (Season 2, Episode 10) [TV series episode]. In M. Magnus (Producer), Skam. NRK. https://skam.p3.no/2016/05/19/trussel/#comments
- Andem, J. (Scriptwriter & Director). (2017, June 2). Fakker over vennene sine [Fucking over one’s friends] (Season 4, Episode 7) [TV series episode]. In M. Furevold (Producer), Skam. NRK. https://skam.p3.no/2017/06/02/fakker-over-vennene-sine/#comments
- Andersen, T. R, & Linkis, S. T. (2019). As we speak: Concurrent narration and participation in the serial narratives “@I_Bombadil” and Skam. Narrative, 27(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2019.0005
- Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., Trans.; C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1975)
- Bengtsson, E., Källquist, R., & Sveningsson, M. (2018). Combining new and old viewing practices: Uses and experiences of the transmedia series “Skam”. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0012
- Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.A. (2012). Agonistic participatory design: Working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, 8(2-3), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672577
- Bom, A. K. (2018). På tvers av grenser og lag: Skam i et transmedialt og multimodalt perspektiv [Across borders and layers: Skam in a transmedial and multimodal perspective]. In S. S. Lindtner, & D. Skarstein (Eds.), Dramaserien Skam: Analytiske perspektiver og didaktiske muligheter [The drama series Skam: Analytical perspectives and didactic possibilities] (pp. 53–71). Fagbokforlaget.
- Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
- Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Intellect.
- Ceccarelli, L. (2001). Shaping science with rhetoric: The cases of Dobhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. The University of Chicago Press.
- Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1994). Communication and the ground of dialogue. In R. Anderson, K. N. Cissna, & R. C. Arnett (Eds.), The reach of dialogue. Confirmation, voice and community (pp. 9–30). Hampton Press.
- Dahl, J. M., & Lindtner, S. S. (2018). Skam 3 – empati som demokratisk ressurs [Skam 3 – empathy as a democratic resource]. In S. S. Lindtner & D. Skarstein (Eds.). Dramaserien Skam: Analytiske perspektiver og didaktiske muligheter [The drama series Skam: Analytical perspectives and didactic possibilities] (pp. 181–196). Fagbokforlaget.
- Drotner, K. (2018). Meeting change with creativity: Interview with Kirsten Drotner. In I. Eleá, & L. Mikos (Eds.), Young & creative: Digital technologies empowering children in everyday life (pp. 221–225). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-10061
- Duggan, J. (2020). Revitalizing seriality: Social media, spreadability, and SKAM’s success beyond Scandinavia. The Journal of Popular Culture, 53(5), 1004–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12954
- Eleà, I., & Mikos, L. (Eds.). (2018). Young & creative: Digital technologies empowering children in everyday life. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-10061
- Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066
- Habermas, J. (1993). Further reflections on the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.). Habermas and the public sphere (pp.421–461). MIT Press.
- Huybrechts, L., Benesch, H., & Geib, J. (2017). Institutioning: Participatory design, co-design and the public realm. CoDesign, 13(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
- Jenkins, H., Puroshotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., & Robison, A. J. (2009) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/26083/1004003.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Jerslev, A. (2017). SKAMs ‘lige her’ og ‘lige nu’: Om SKAM og nærvær [SKAM’s ‘right here’ and ‘right now’: About SKAM and presence]. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, 6(2/3), 75–81. https://tidsskrift.dk/ntik/article/view/99080/148191
- Jørgensen, K. K. (2016, May 23). Mener «Skam» burde være pensum [Believes “Skam” should be on the reading list]. NRK. https://www.nrk.no/livsstil/mener-_skam_-burde-vaere-pensum-1.12959025
- Keegan, P. (2021). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.06.003
- Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2018). Understanding the rhetoric of dialogue and the dialogue of rhetoric. In Ø. Ihlen, & M. Taylor (Eds.), The handbook of organizational rhetoric and communication (pp. 315–327). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119265771
- Krüger, S., & Rustad, G. (2017). Coping with shame in a media-saturated society: Norwegian web series Skam as transitional object. Television & New Media, 20(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417741379
- Kümmerling-Meibauer, B. (2017). Series: Prequels, sequels, trilogies, and other concepts of serialization. In C. Beauvais, & M. Nikolajeva (Eds), Edinburgh companion to children’s literature (pp.167–178). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12954
- Lindtner, S. S., & Dahl, J. M. (2018). “Håpar Noora vaknar opp og gjev eit tydeleg signal til norske jenter”: Mediepanikk og debatten om Skam i norsk media [“Hope Noora wakes up and gives a clear signal to Norwegian girls”: Media panic and the debate about Skam in the Norwegian media]. In S. S. Lindtner, & D. Skarstein (Eds.), Dramaserien Skam: Analytiske perspektiver og didaktiske muligheter [The drama series Skam: Analytical perspectives and didactic possibilities] (pp. 155–180). Fagbokforlaget.
- Lindtner, S. S., & Dahl, J. M. (2019). Aligning adolescents to the public sphere: The teen serial Skam and democratic aesthetic. Javnost: The Public, 26(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1529471
- Lindtner, S. S., & Skarstein, D. (Eds.). (2018). Dramaserien Skam: Analytiske perspektiver og didaktiske muligheter [The drama series Skam: Analytical perspectives and didactic possibilities]. Fagbokforlaget.
- Livingstone, S. (2009) Children and the internet: Great expectations, challenging realities. Polity.
- Lo, J. (2017). Empowering young people through conflict and conciliation: Attending to the political and agonism in in democratic education. Democracy and Education, 25(2), 1–9.
- Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Merriam- Webster. (n.d.-a). Schadenfreude. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/schadenfreude
- Merriam- Webster. (n.d.-b). Woke. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woke
- Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349
- Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870112
- Pearce, C. (2017). Reality and fiction in contemporary television: The case of Skam. TDR/The Drama Review, 61(4), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00700
- Pearson, R. (1989). Business ethics as communication ethics: Public relations practice and the idea of dialogue. In C. H. Botan, & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 111–131). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Prøitz, L., Carlquist, E., & Roen, K. (2019). Affected and connected: Feminist and psychological emotion in social media. Feminist Media Studies, 19(8), 1114–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1546210
- Rasmussen, I., & Valtysson, B. (2017). At føle meget. Affektive relationer i SKAM fanfællesskaber [To feel a lot: Affective relationships in SKAM fan communities]. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, 6(2/3), 99–104. https://tidsskrift.dk/ntik/article/view/99092/148202
- Richardson, K. (2010). Television dramatic dialogue: A sociolinguistic study. Oxford University Press.
- Rønlev, R. (2020). Tekstlig-intertekstlig analyse [Textual-intertextual analysis]. In M. Bengtsson, K. M. Berg, & S. Iversen (Eds), Retorik og metode [Rhetoric and method] (pp. 49–69). Samfundslitteratur.
- Scolari, C. A., Masanet, M.-J., Guerrero-Pico, M., & Establés, M.-J. (2018). Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: An international map of teens’ transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. The Information Professional, 27(4), 801–812. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/42762
- Skarstein, D. (2018). Lesingar av Skam – seriens kommentarfelt som tolkingsfellesskap [Readings of Skam – the series’ comment field as a community of interpretation]. In S. S. Lindtner, & D. Skarstein (Eds.). Dramaserien Skam: Analytiske perspektiver og didaktiske muligheter [The drama series Skam: Analytical perspectives and didactic possibilities]. (pp. 197–219). Fagbokforlaget.
- Sundet, V. S. (2017, June 25). «Det er bare du som kan føle det du føler» – emosjonell investering og engasjement i nettdramaet SKAM [“Only you can feel what you feel” – emotional investment and commitment to the online drama SHAME]. 16:9 filmtidsskrift. http://www.16-9.dk/2017/06/det-er-bare-du-som-kan-foele/
- Sundet, V. S. (2020). From ‘secret’ online teen drama to international cult phenomenon: The global expansion of SKAM and its public service mission. Critical Studies in Television, 15(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749602019879856
- Sundet, V. S., & Petersen, L. N. (2020). Ins and outs of transmedia fandom: Motives for entering and exiting the SKAM fan community online. Poetics, 84, 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101510
- Svendsen, M. (2016, May 23). Kripos hyller “Skam” – Noora [Kripos pays tribute to “Skam” – Noora]. VG. https://www.vg.no/rampelys/tv/i/B8aRv/kripos-hyller-skam-noora
- Winnicott, D. (1971). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In D. Winnicott (Ed.), Playing and reality (pp. 1–31). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1953)
- Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me. In P. Buckley (Ed.), Essential papers on object relations, 254–271. New York University Press.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Published on: Feb 10, 2022
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2022 Harald Hornmoen, Yngve Benestad Hågvar, Nathalie Hyde-Clarke, Birgitte Kjos Fonn, Dagny Stuedahl, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.