Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication Cover

Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Altfer, B. (2020). Denmark: Research. In F. Chiusi, S. Fischer, N. Kayser-Bril, & M. Spielkamp (Eds.), Automating society report 2020 (pp. 52–61). Algorithm Watch, Berletsmann Stiftung. https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org
  2. Andersen, A. N. (2019). Danmark er ved at blive Europas Kina (når det handler om overvågning) [Denmark is becoming Europe's China (when it concerns surveillance)] [blog post]. [SDU blog]. https://holderdetibyretten.wordpress.com/2019/05/15/danmark-er-ved-at-blive-europas-kina-nar-det-handler-om-overvagning/
  3. Andersen, M., & Sundet, V. (2019). Producing online youth fiction in a Nordic public service context. Journal of European Television History and Culture, 8(16), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2019.jethc179
  4. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
  5. Andersson Schwarz, J. (2016). Public service broadcasting and data-driven personalization: A view from Sweden. Television & New Media, 17(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415616193
  6. Andreassen, R. (2020). digitale sorteringskategorier, affordances og interfaces: Online shopping of digitalt forbrug af sex og sæd [Digital sorting categories, affordances and interfaces: Online shopping of digital consumption of sex and semen]. In R. Andreassen, R. Rex, & C. Svabo (Eds.), Digitale liv. Brugere, Platforme og Selvfremstillinger [Digital life: Users, platforms and self-portrayals] (pp. 161–183). Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
  7. Andreassen, R. (2021). Social media surveillance, LGBTQ refugees and asylum: How migration authorities use social media profiles to determine refugees as ‘genuine’ or ‘fraud’. First Monday, 26(1–4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i1.10653
  8. Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075319
  9. Andrejevic, M. (2020). Automated media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429242595
  10. Antczak, H. & Birkholm, B. (2019). Når borgeren bliver til data… fordufter den etiske fordring [When the citizen becomes data… the ethical demand evaporates]. Uden for nummer, 39(19), 4–19. https://social-raadgiverne.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/39-UdenForNummer.pdf
  11. Baum, M., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
  12. Beckett, C. (2020). An algorithm for empowering public service news [blog post]. The London School of Economic and Political Science. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2020/09/28/this-swedish-radio-algorithm-gets-reporters-out-in-society/
  13. Bennett, J. (2018). Public service algorithms. In D. Freedman, & V. Goblot (Eds.), The future of public service television (pp. 111–120). Goldsmiths Press.
  14. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR 81, 77–91. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a/buolamwini18a.pdf
  15. Burkart, P., & Leijonhufvud, S. (2019). The Spotification of public service media. The Information Society, 35(4), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1613706
  16. Campbell, J. E. (2018). Polarized: Making sense of a divided America. Princeton University Press.
  17. Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. NYU Press.
  18. Constanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press.
  19. Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.
  20. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonising human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  21. Dencik, L., Jansen, F., & Metcalfe, P. (2016, August 30). A conceptual framework for approaching social justice in an age of datafication. DATAJUSTICE Project. https://datajusticeproject.net/2018/08/30/a-conceptual-framework-for-approaching-social-justice-in-an-age-of-datafication/
  22. Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities approaches to interface theory. Culture Machine, 12(1), 1–20. https://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/3-Humanities-434-885-1-PB.pdf
  23. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
  24. Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St Martin's Press.
  25. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
  26. Government Offices of Sweden. (2018). National approach to artificial intelligence. Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. https://www.regeringen.se/4aa638/contentassets/a6488ccebc6f418e9ada18bae40bb71f/national-approach-to-artificial-intelligence.pdf
  27. Heeks, R., & Renken, J. (2016). Data justice for development: What would it mean? Information Development, 34(19), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916678282
  28. Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society (July–December), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080
  29. Hokka, J. (2017). Making public service under social media logics. International Journal of Digital Television, 8(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdtv.8.2.221_1
  30. Hokka, J. (2018). Towards nuanced universality: Developing a concept bible for public service online news production. European Journal of Communication, 34(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118810862
  31. Iliadis, A., & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
  32. Jakobsson, P., Lindell, J., & Stiernstedt, F. (2021, September 29). A neoliberal media welfare state? The Swedish media system in transformation. Javnost – the Public. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1969506
  33. Jewkes, Y., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2016). A brave new world: The problems and opportunities presented by new media technologies in prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816654953
  34. Johnson, J. (2014). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9351-8
  35. Kannabiran, G., & Petersen, M. G. (2010, October). Politics at the interface: A Foucauldian power analysis. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI 2010, 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1869007
  36. Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2020). Doing time, the smart way? Temporalities of the smart prison. New Media and Society, 22(9), 1580–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820914865
  37. Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2021, June 25). Prison tech: Imagining the prison as lagging behind and as a test bed for technology advancement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1–15. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab032
  38. Kofoed-Hansen, L., & Søndergaard, M. L. J. (2017). Designing with bias and privilege? Nordes 2017, (7). http://www.nordes.org
  39. Mann, M., & Matzner, T. (2019). Challenging algorithmic profiling: The limits of data protection and anti-discrimination in responding to emergent discrimination. Big Data & Society, (July–December), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719895805
  40. Metcalfe, P., & Dencik, L. (2019). The politics of big borders: Data (in)justice and the governance of refugees. First Monday, 24(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9934
  41. Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
  42. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, Finland. (2017). Finland's age of artificial intelligence: Turning Finland into a leading country in the application of artificial intelligence: Objective and recommendations for measures. Publications of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment 47/2017. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/160391/TEMrap_47_2017_verkkojulkaisu.pdf
  43. Ministry of Finance, Finland. (2021). National artificial intelligence programme AuroraAI. https://vm.fi/en/national-artificial-intelligence-programme-auroraai
  44. Moe, H. (2013). Public service broadcasting and social networking sites: The Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation on Facebook. Media International Australia, 146(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1314600115
  45. Motzfeldt, H. M. (2019). Socialrådgivere og fagforeninger: Grib dog redningskransen! [Social workers and trade unions: Grab the lifebuoy!]. Uden for nummer, 39, 32–40.
  46. Mploy. (2018, September 26). Evaluering af projekt ”Samtaler og indsats der modvirker langtidsledighed” [Evaluation of project “Conversations and efforts that counteract long-term unemployment”]. Styrelsen for Arbjedsmarkad og Rekruttering [The Danish Agency for Labor Market and Recruitment]. https://star.dk/media/8004/evaluering-af-projekt-samtaler-og-indsats-der-modvirker-langtidsledighed.pdf
  47. Nikunen, K. (2019). Media solidarities: Emotions, power and justice in the digital age. Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529715019
  48. Nikunen, K., & Hokka, J. (2020). Welfare state values and public service media in the era of datafication. Global Perspectives, 1(1), 12906. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12906
  49. Noble, S. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
  50. Oak, E. (2015). A minority report for social work? The predictive risk model (PRM) and the Tuituia assessment framework in addressing the needs of New Zealand's vulnerable children. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1208–1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv028
  51. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Viking.
  52. Pratt, J. (2008). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. The British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm072
  53. Pratt, J., & Eriksson, A. (2012). In defence of Scandinavian exceptionalism. In T. Ugelvik, & J. Dullum (Eds.), Penal exceptionalism? Nordic prison policy and practice (pp. 235–260). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813270
  54. Retsinformation [legal information]. (2019). Lov om aktiv beskæftigelsesindsats [law about active support for employment]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/548#idefaafed5-e8e7-4062-abf9-c62a4c18d707
  55. Saha, A. (2018). Race and the cultural industries. Wiley.
  56. Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, (January), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
  57. Sun, H., & Hart-Davidson, W. F. (2014, April). Binding the material and the discursive with a relational approach of affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3533–3542. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557185
  58. Sundet, V. (2017). Co-produced television drama and the cost of transnational ‘success’: The making of Lilyhammer. In E. Bakoy, R. Pujik, & A. Spicer (Eds.), Building successful and sustainable film and television businesses (pp. 67–88). University of Chicago Press.
  59. Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
  60. Sørensen, J. K., & Van den Bulck, H. (2020). Public service media online, advertising and the third-party user data business: A trade versus trust dilemma? Convergence, 26(2), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518790203
  61. Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data and Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
  62. The Danish Government [Regeringen]. (2019). National strategi for kunstig intelligens [National strategy for artificial intelligence]. Finansministeriet & Erhvervsministeriet [Ministry of Finance & Ministry of Business]. https://www.regeringen.dk/media/6537/ai-strategi_web.pdf
  63. The Danish Parliament [Folketinget]. (2019). Forslag til Lov om en aktiv beskæftigelsesindsats [draft law about active support for employment]. Danish Parliament records. https://www.ft.dk/ripdf/samling/20181/lovforslag/l209/20181_l209_som_fremsat.pdf
  64. The Swedish Prison and Probation Service [Kriminalvården]. (2015, December 8). Unik satsning på frivårdsapp [Unique investment in probation app] [Press release].
  65. The Swedish Prison and Probation Service [Kriminalvården]. (2017, July 11). Frivårdsappen får tummen upp av användare [Probation app gets thumbs up of users] [Press release].
  66. The Swedish Prison and Probation Service [Kriminalvården]. (2018). Kriminalvården storsatsar digitalt – och söker nya medarbetare [The Swedish Prison and Probation Service is investing heavily in digital – and is looking for new employees] [Press release]. https://www.kriminalvarden.se/globalassets/kontakt_press/pressmeddelanden/krimtech-klar.pdf
  67. Turow, J. (2011). The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. Yale University Press.
  68. Ustek-Spilda, F., & Alastalo, M. (2020). Software-sorted exclusion of asylum seekers in Norway and Finland. Global Perspectives, 1(1), 12978. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12978
  69. Van den Bulck, H., & Moe, H. (2018). Public service media, universality and personalisation through algorithms: Mapping strategies and exploring dilemmas. Media, Culture & Society, 40(6), 875–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734407
  70. van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
  71. van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Wall, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
  72. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0051 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 207 - 223
Published on: Dec 5, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Rikke Andreassen, Anne Kaun, Kaarina Nikunen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.