Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Move, eat, sleep, repeat: Living by rhythm with proactive self-tracking technologies Cover

Move, eat, sleep, repeat: Living by rhythm with proactive self-tracking technologies

By: Minna Vigren and  Harley Bergroth  
Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digital Health, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509
  2. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
  3. Breault, R. A. (2016). Emerging issues in duoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 777–794. 10.1080/09518398.2016.1162866
  4. Cann, C., & DeMeulenaere, E. (2010). Forged in the crucibles of difference: Building discordant communities. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 7(1), 41–53.
  5. Chang, H., Hernandez, K.-A. C., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography. Left Coast Press.
  6. Cifor, M., & Garcia, P. (2019). Inscribing gender: A duoethnographic examination of gendered values and practices in fitness tracker design. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Scholar Space, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2132–2141. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/59652
  7. Clark, M. I., & Thorpe, H. (2020). Towards diffractive ways of knowing women's moving bodies: A Baradian experiment with the fitbit–motherhood entanglement. Sociology of Sport Journal, 37(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2018-0173
  8. Coia, L., & Taylor, M. (2009). Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In L. Fitzgerald, M. Heston, & D. Tidwell (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (Vol. 9) (pp. 3–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_1
  9. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/778828
  10. Edensor, T. (2012). Introduction: Thinking about rhythm and space. In T. Edensor (Ed.), Geographies of rhythm: Nature, place, mobilities and bodies (pp. 1–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315584430
  11. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 733–768). Sage.
  12. Fotopoulou, A., & O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582
  13. Foucault, M. (2015). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760031
  14. Jones, P., & Warren, S. (2016). Time, rhythm and the creative economy. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 41(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12122
  15. Kristensen, D., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650
  16. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology-building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–259). MIT Press.
  17. Lazar, A., Koehler, C., Tanenbaum, J., & Nguyen, D. H. (2015). Why we use and abandon smart devices. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804288
  18. Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (G. Moore, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1992). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385
  19. Lefebvre, H., & Régulier, C. (2004). Attempt at the rhythmanalysis of Mediterranean cities. In H. Lefebvre, Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (G. Moore, Trans.) (pp. 87–100). (Original work published 1992). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385.0008
  20. Lomborg, S., Thylstrup, N. B., & Schwartz, J. (2018). The temporal flows of self-tracking: Checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media and Society, 20(12), 4590–4607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818778542
  21. Lund, D. E., & Nabavi, M. (2008). A duo-ethnographic conversation on social justice activism: Exploring issues of identity, racism, and activism with young people. Multicultural Education, 15(4), 27–32.
  22. Lupton, D. (2013). Understanding the human machine. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2013.2286431
  23. Lupton, D. (2016a). Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data-human assemblages. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715619947
  24. Lupton, D. (2016b). The quantified self: A sociology of self-tracking. Polity Press.
  25. Maturo, A., & Moretti, V. (2018). Digital health and the gamification of life: How apps can promote a positive medicalization. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-365-220181002
  26. Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1785–1794. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
  27. Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. (2012). Toward a dialogic method. In J. Norris, R. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–40). Left Coast Press.
  28. Pantzar, M., & Ruckenstein, M. (2017). Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. Digital Health, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617712590
  29. Pantzar, M., Ruckenstein, M., & Mustonen, V. (2018). Social rhythms of the heart. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184580
  30. Parviainen, J. (2016). Quantified bodies in the checking loop: Analyzing the choreographies of biomonitoring and generating big data. Human Technology, 12(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201605192620
  31. Reigeluth, T. (2014). Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 243–354. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4741
  32. Salmela, T., Valtonen, A., & Lupton, D. (2019). The affective circle of harassment and enchantment: Reflections on the LURA Ring as an intimate research device. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418801376
  33. Sanders, R. (2017). Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society, 23(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x16660366
  34. Schüll, N. D. (2016a). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11, 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.47
  35. Schüll, N. D. (2016b). Sensor technology and the time-series self. Continent, 5(1), 24–29.
  36. Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2016). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0046 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 137 - 151
Published on: Sep 9, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Minna Vigren, Harley Bergroth, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.