Aagaard, J. (2016). Mobile devices, interaction, and distraction: A qualitative exploration of absent presence. Ai & Society, 31(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0638-z
Alač, M. (2014). Digital scientific visuals as fields for interaction. In C. Coopmans (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice revisited (pp. 61–87). MIT Press.
Alač, M., & Hutchins, E. (2004). I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3–4), 629–661. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537042484977
Assing Hvidt, E., Søndergaard, J., Klausen, M., & Grønning, A. (2020). Not just an information-delivery tool: An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 38(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939
Becvar, L. A., Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E. (2005). Hands as molecules: Representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.89
Cowley, S. J., Major, J. C., Steffensen, S. V., & Dinis, A. J. (2010). Signifying bodies: Biosemiosis, interaction and health. Catholic University of Portugal.
Fage-Butler, A. M., & Jensen, M. N. (2015). The relevance of existing health communication models in the email age: An integrative literature review. Communication & Medicine, 12(2–3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.18399
Gahrn-Andersen, R., Johannessen, C. M., Harvey, M. I., Simonsen, L. M., Trasmundi, S. B., Marchetti, E., Warsøe, L. B., Fester-Seeger, M.-T., Lebahn, M., & Steffensen, S. V. (2019). Interactivity: Why, what and how? Rask, 50, 113–136.
Gergen, K. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In M. Aakhus, & J. Katz (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
Greatbatch, D., Heath, C., Campion, P., & Luff, P. (1995). How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction. Family Practice, 12(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.1.32
Greatbatch, D., Luff, P., Heath, C., & Campion, P. (1993). Interpersonal communication and human-computer interaction: An examination of the use of computers in medical consultations. Interacting with Computers, 5(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(93)90018-O
Grønning, A. (2016). Digital consultations and ageing: Perceptions, mediation and ethics [Application for THE VELUX FOUNDATIONS, Odense, University of Southern Denmark].
Grønning, A., Assing Hvidt, E., Brøgger, M. N., & Fage-Butler, A. M. (2020). How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study. BMJ Open, 10(10), e039442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039442.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x
Laursen, D., Simonsen, L. M., & Grønning, A. (under review). Methodological challenges in researching email consultations as a form of communication in patient-provider interactions. Qualitative Research.
Linell, P. (2010). Communicative activity types as organisations in discourses and discourses in organisations. In S.-K. Tanskanen, M.-L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & M. Raitaniemi (Eds.), Discourses in interaction (pp. 33–59). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Linell, P. (2017). Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity: A conceptually bewildering field? Language and Dialogue, 7(3), 301–335. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
Linell, P., & Thunqvist, D. P. (2003). Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(3), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00143-1
Luff, P. K., & Heath, C. (2019). Visible objects of concern: Issues and challenges for workplace ethnographies in complex environments. Organization, 26(4), 578–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419828578
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
Nielsen, S. B. (2019). Making a glance an action: Doctors’ quick looks at their desk-top computer screens. Journal of Pragmatics, 142: 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.021
Oudshoorn, N. (2009). Physical and digital proximity: Emerging ways of health care in face-to-face and telemonitoring of heart-failure patients. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(3), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01141.x
Pedersen, S. B. (2015). The cognitive ecology of human errors in emergency medicine: An interactivity-based approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark].
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Sarangi, S. (2000). Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In S. Sarangi, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Discourse and social life (pp. 1–27). Longman.
Simonsen, L. M. (in progress). Digitalization of the wild: A cognitive ethnography of interprofessional interactions with digital consultations [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark].
Simonsen, L. M., & Steffensen, S. V. (2019). Hybrid cognition in medical simulation: Investigating microlevel organisational cognition. Proceedings of the European Academy of Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–35.
Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley, & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195–221). Springer.
Steffensen, S. V. (2015). Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences, 50, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.004
Steffensen, S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2016). Cognitive events in a problem-solving task: A qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193
Sutton, J. (2012). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). MIT Press.
Trasmundi, S. B., & Steffensen, S. V. (2016). Meaning emergence in the ecology of dialogical systems. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0009