Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hybrid presence: Integrating interprofessional interactions with digital consultations Cover

Hybrid presence: Integrating interprofessional interactions with digital consultations

Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. Aagaard, J. (2016). Mobile devices, interaction, and distraction: A qualitative exploration of absent presence. Ai & Society, 31(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0638-z
  2. Alač, M. (2014). Digital scientific visuals as fields for interaction. In C. Coopmans (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice revisited (pp. 61–87). MIT Press.
  3. Alač, M., & Hutchins, E. (2004). I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3–4), 629–661. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537042484977
  4. Assing Hvidt, E., Søndergaard, J., Klausen, M., & Grønning, A. (2020). Not just an information-delivery tool: An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 38(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939
  5. Bang, J. C., Døør, J., Steffensen, S. V., & Nash, J. (2007). Language, ecology, and society: A dialectical approach. Continuum.
  6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
  7. Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Becvar, L. A., Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E. (2005). Hands as molecules: Representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.89
  9. Chemero, A. (2000). What events are. Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_3
  10. Cowley, S. J., Major, J. C., Steffensen, S. V., & Dinis, A. J. (2010). Signifying bodies: Biosemiosis, interaction and health. Catholic University of Portugal.
  11. Fage-Butler, A. M., & Jensen, M. N. (2015). The relevance of existing health communication models in the email age: An integrative literature review. Communication & Medicine, 12(2–3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.18399
  12. Gahrn-Andersen, R., Johannessen, C. M., Harvey, M. I., Simonsen, L. M., Trasmundi, S. B., Marchetti, E., Warsøe, L. B., Fester-Seeger, M.-T., Lebahn, M., & Steffensen, S. V. (2019). Interactivity: Why, what and how? Rask, 50, 113–136.
  13. Gergen, K. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In M. Aakhus, & J. Katz (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.
  15. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
  16. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin.
  17. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  18. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
  19. Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
  20. Greatbatch, D., Heath, C., Campion, P., & Luff, P. (1995). How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction. Family Practice, 12(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.1.32
  21. Greatbatch, D., Luff, P., Heath, C., & Campion, P. (1993). Interpersonal communication and human-computer interaction: An examination of the use of computers in medical consultations. Interacting with Computers, 5(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(93)90018-O
  22. Grønning, A. (2016). Digital consultations and ageing: Perceptions, mediation and ethics [Application for THE VELUX FOUNDATIONS, Odense, University of Southern Denmark].
  23. Grønning, A., Assing Hvidt, E., Brøgger, M. N., & Fage-Butler, A. M. (2020). How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study. BMJ Open, 10(10), e039442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039442.
  24. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
  25. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
  26. Hutchins, E. (2014). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.830548
  27. Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x
  28. Laursen, D., Simonsen, L. M., & Grønning, A. (under review). Methodological challenges in researching email consultations as a form of communication in patient-provider interactions. Qualitative Research.
  29. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Information Age Publishing.
  30. Linell, P. (2010). Communicative activity types as organisations in discourses and discourses in organisations. In S.-K. Tanskanen, M.-L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & M. Raitaniemi (Eds.), Discourses in interaction (pp. 33–59). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  31. Linell, P. (2017). Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity: A conceptually bewildering field? Language and Dialogue, 7(3), 301–335. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
  32. Linell, P., & Thunqvist, D. P. (2003). Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(3), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00143-1
  33. Luff, P. K., & Heath, C. (2019). Visible objects of concern: Issues and challenges for workplace ethnographies in complex environments. Organization, 26(4), 578–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419828578
  34. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
  35. Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
  36. Nielsen, S. B. (2019). Making a glance an action: Doctors’ quick looks at their desk-top computer screens. Journal of Pragmatics, 142: 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.021
  37. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379493
  38. Oudshoorn, N. (2009). Physical and digital proximity: Emerging ways of health care in face-to-face and telemonitoring of heart-failure patients. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(3), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01141.x
  39. Pedersen, S. B. (2015). The cognitive ecology of human errors in emergency medicine: An interactivity-based approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark].
  40. Pedersen, S. B., & Steffensen, S. V. (2014). Temporal dynamics in medical visual systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1–2), 143–157.
  41. Sacks, H., Jefferson, G., & Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
  42. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
  43. Sarangi, S. (2000). Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In S. Sarangi, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Discourse and social life (pp. 1–27). Longman.
  44. Scolari, C. A. (2012). Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Communication Theory, 22(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01404.x
  45. Simonsen, L. M. (in progress). Digitalization of the wild: A cognitive ethnography of interprofessional interactions with digital consultations [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark].
  46. Simonsen, L. M., & Steffensen, S. V. (2021/in press). Hybrid cognition in medical discharges. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior.
  47. Simonsen, L. M., & Steffensen, S. V. (2019). Hybrid cognition in medical simulation: Investigating microlevel organisational cognition. Proceedings of the European Academy of Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–35.
  48. Steffensen, S. V. (2012). Care and conversing in dialogical systems. Language Sciences, 34(5), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.008
  49. Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley, & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195–221). Springer.
  50. Steffensen, S. V. (2015). Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences, 50, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.004
  51. Steffensen, S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2016). Cognitive events in a problem-solving task: A qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193
  52. Sutton, J. (2012). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). MIT Press.
  53. Trasmundi, S. B. (2020). Errors and interaction: A cognitive ethnography of emergency medicine (Vol. 309). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  54. Trasmundi, S. B., & Steffensen, S. V. (2016). Meaning emergence in the ecology of dialogical systems. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0009
  55. Tribble, E., & Sutton, J. (2011). Cognitive ecology as a framework for Shakespearean studies. Shakespeare Studies, 39, 94–103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 44
Published on: Sep 9, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Line Maria Simonsen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.