Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Co-constitutive complexityUnpacking Google’s privacy policy and terms of service post-GDPR

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. London: Duke University Press.
  2. Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
  3. Ausloos, J., & Dewitte, P. (2018). Shattering one-way mirros: Data subject access rights in practice. International Data Privacy Law, 8(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy001
  4. Bratton, B. H. (2015). The stack: On software and sovereignty. London: MIT Press.
  5. CNIL. (2019, January 21). The CNIL’s restricted committee imposes a financial penalty of 50 Million euros against GOOGLE LLC. https://www.cnil.fr/en/cnils-restricted-committee-imposes-financial-penalty-50-million-euros-against-google-llc
  6. Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001
  7. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  8. Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The power of infrastructure space. London: Verso Books.
  9. EUR-Lex. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
  10. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2011). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. In D. S. Evans (Ed.), Platform economics: Essays on multi-sided businesses (pp. 2–29). Competition Policy International.
  11. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
  13. Finck, M., & Pallas, F. (2019). The who must not be identified: Distinguishing personal from non-personal data under the GDPR [Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper no 19–14].
  14. Fuchs, C. (2019). Karl Marx in the age of Big Data capitalism. In D. Chander, & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of Big Data (pp. 53–71). London: University of Westminster Press.
  15. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
  16. Google Privacy & Terms. (1999). Google and privacy. Acessed April 27, 2020, from https://policies.google.com/privacy/archive/19990609?hl=en&gl=dk
  17. Google Privacy & Terms. (2020, 31 March). Google terms of service. https://www.gstatic.com/policies/terms/pdf/20200331/ba461e2f/google_terms_of_service_en_eu.pdf
  18. Google Privacy & Terms. (2021, 4 February). Google privacy policy. https://www.gstatic.com/policies/privacy/pdf/20210204/3jla0xz1/google_privacy_policy_en-GB_eu.pdf
  19. Google Privacy & Terms. (n.d.). Who are Google’s partners? Accessed April 27, 2020, from https://policies.google.com/privacy/google-partners?hl=en&gl=dk
  20. Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: What it is and what it means. Information & Communication Technology Law, 28(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501
  21. Houser, K. A., & Voss, G. (2018). GDPR: The end of Google and Facebook or a new paradigm in data privacy? Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 25(1).
  22. Jørgensen, R. F. (2017). Framing human rights: Exploring storytelling within Internet companies. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233
  23. Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
  24. Klass, G. (2019). Empiricism and privacy policies in the restatement of consumer contract law. Yale Journal on Regulation, 36(1), 45–116. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/yjor36&i=51
  25. Laurer, M., & Seidl, T. (2020, June 25). Regulating the European data-driven economy: A case study on the general data protection regulation. Policy & Internet. Early view. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.246
  26. Nielsen. (n.d.). Digital measurement privacy statement (last updated August 2020).
  27. Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.
  28. Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. London: Harvard University Press.
  29. Peslak, A., Kovalchick, L., & Conforti, M. (2020). A longitudinal study of Google privacy policy. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 13(2), 54–64.
  30. Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
  31. Ruppert, E., Isin, E., & Bigo, D. (2017, July 3). Data politics. Big Data & Society, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749
  32. Schwartz, P., & Solove, D. J. (2014). Reconciling personal information in the United States and European Union. California Law Review, 102(4), 877–916. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23784355
  33. Solove, D. J., & Hartzog, W. (2014). The FTC and the new common law on privacy. Columbia Law Review, 114(3), 583–676.
  34. Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  35. Strathern, M. (2000). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Journal, 20(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651562
  36. Valtysson, B. (2018). Camouflaged culture: The ‘discursive journey’ of the EU’s cultural programmes. Croatian International Relations Review, 24(82), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/cirr-2018-0008
  37. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Vanberg, A. D. (2021). Informational privacy post GDPR – end of the road or the start of a long journey? The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(1), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1789109
  40. Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
  41. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 124 - 140
Published on: May 6, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Bjarki Valtysson, Rikke Frank Jørgensen, Johan Lau Munkholm, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.