Class conditioning and class positioning in young people's everyday life with digital media
References
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035356 - Correa, T. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1095–1107.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023 - Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. (2019). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351017831 - Danielsson, M. (2014). Digitala distinktioner: Klass och kontinuitet i unga mäns vardagliga mediepraktiker [Digital distinctions: Class and continuity in young men's everyday media practices] [Doctoral dissertation, Jönköping University, Sweden].
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-24372 - Davies, H. C., & Eynon, R. (2018). Is digital upskilling the next generation our ‘pipeline to prosperity’? New Media & Society, 20(11), 3961–3979.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818783102 - Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845 - Government Offices of Sweden. (2000). Ett informationssamhälle för alla: Prop. 1999/2000:86 [An information society for everyone: Proposition 1999/2000:86].
https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/proposition/2000/03/prop.-1999200086/ - Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of Internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963–980.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751 - Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x - Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782 - Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113499113 - Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children's learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00431.x - Hort, S. E. O. (2014). Social policy, welfare state, and civil society in Sweden, volume I: History, policies, and institutions 1884–1988 (3rd ed.). Lund, Sweden: Arkiv förlag.
- Internetstiftelsen [The Swedish Internet Foundation]. (2019). Svenskarna och internet 2019 [The Swedes and Internet 2019].
https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/app/uploads/2019/10/svenskarna-och-internet-2019-a4.pdf - Katz, V. S., & Gonzales, C. (2016). Community variations in low-income Latino families’ technology adoption and integration. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 59–80.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601712 - Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Livingstone, S. (2011). If everything is mediated, what is distinctive about the field of communication? International Journal of Communication, 5, 1472–1475.
https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1356/620 - Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335 - Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. EU Kids Online, LSE.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/63378 - Murdock, G., Hartmann, P., & Gray, P. (1992). Contextualizing home computing: Resources and practices. In R. Silverstone, & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (pp. 146–160). London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203401491 - Nordicom. (2019). Nordicom-Sveriges mediebarometer 2018 [Nordicom-Sweden's media barometer 2018].
https://www.nordicom.gu.se/sv/system/tdf/publikationer-hela-pdf/nordicom_sveriges_mediebarometer_2018.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=40345&force=0 - North, S., Snyder, I., & Bulfin, S. (2008). Digital tastes: Social class and young people's technology use. Information, Communication & Society, 11(7), 895–911.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802109006 - OECD. (2018). A broken social elevator? How to promote social mobility: Overview and main findings.
http://www.oecd.org/social/soc/Social-mobility-2018-Overview-MainFindings.pdf - Olsson, T. (2002). Mycket väsen om ingenting: Hur datorn och internet undgår att formas till medborgarens tekniker [Much ado about nothing: How the computer and the Internet miss their plight as tools of the citizen] [Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University, Sweden].
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-2692 - Pettersson, C. (2001). Datorer åt många: En studie om datorn som vardagsteknik och kunskapsverktyg [Computers for the many: A study about the computer as everyday technology and knowledge device] [Licentiate Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden].
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-34068 - Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 - Reay, D. (2004). Gendering Bourdieu's concept of capitals? Emotional capital, women and social class. In L. Adkins, & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (pp. 57–74). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 488–507.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902857678 - Robinson, L., & Schulz, J. (2013). Net time negotiations within the family. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 542–560.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.777761 - Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Scheerder, A. J., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective. New Media & Society, 21(10), 2099–2118.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819844299 - Schofield Clark, L., Demont-Heinrich, C., & Webber, S. A. (2004). Ethnographic interviews on the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(4), 529–547.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804044333 - Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519 - Snell, J. (2013). Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Language and Education, 27(2), 110–128.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.760584 - Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
https://www.doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001 - Therborn, G. (2018). Kapitalet, överheten och alla vi andra: Klassamhället i Sverige – det rådande och det kommande [Capital, authority and the rest of us: Class society in Sweden – the present and the future]. Lund, Sweden: Arkiv förlag.
- Tripp, L. (2010). ‘The computer is not for you to be looking around, it is for schoolwork’: Challenges for digital inclusion as Latino immigrant families negotiate children's access to the Internet. New Media & Society, 13(4), 552–567.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810375293 - van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E., Eynon, R., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 452–473.
https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5739/1911 - Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
Language: English
Page range: 150 - 162
Published on: Apr 7, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 Martin Danielsson, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.