References
- Alexander, J. C. (Ed.). (1998). Real civil societies: Dilemmas of institutionalization. London: Sage.
- Alston, P. (2017). The populist challenge to human rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hux007 - Aslanidis, P. (2017). Populism and social movements. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 305–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001 - Collins, H., Evans, R., Durant, D., & Weinel, M. (2020). Experts and the will of the people: Society, populism and science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26983-8 - Council of the European Union. (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, The Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Related Acts.
http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/ams/sign - Datta, N. (2018). Restoring the natural order: The religious extremists’ vision to mobilise European societies against human rights on sexuality and reproduction. European Parliamentary Forum on Population & Development.
https://www.epfweb.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/rtno_epf_book_lores.pdf - de la Torre, C., & Mazzoleni, O. (2019). Do we need a minimum definition of populism? An appraisal of Mudde's conceptualisation. Populism, 1(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-02011021 - European Union. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union. Official journal, C326/115.
http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/teu_2012/oj - Grote, J. (2019). Civil society and the European Union: From enthusiasm to disenchantment.
https://doc-research.org/2019/11/civil-society-european-union-enthusiasm/ - Gøtzsche-Astrup, J. (2019). Civil society and its outside: Analysing the boundary between civil and uncivil society in the Danish anti-radicalisation discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 15(2), 162–177.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2019.1595382 - Kalm, S., & Meeuwisse, A. (2020). For love and for life: Emotional dynamics at the World Congress of Families. Global Discourse, 10, 303–320.
https://doi.org/10.1332/204378920X15784019972237 - Krzyżanowska, N., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2018). ‘Crisis’ and migration in Poland: Discursive shifts, anti-pluralism and the politicisation of exclusion. Sociology, 52(3), 612–618.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038518757952 - Krzyzanowski, M., & Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the web populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581.
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz - Majtényi, B., Kopper, Á., & Susánszky, P. (2019). Constitutional othering, ambiguity and subjective risks of mobilisation in Hungary: Examples from the migration crisis. Democratization, 26(2), 173–189.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1493051 - Matthes, J. (2009). What's a frame? A contents analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals 1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107769900908600206 - Ruzza, C. (2010). Identifying uncivil society in Europe: Towards a ‘new politics of the enemy’? In U. Liebert, & H.-J. Trenz (Eds.), The new politics of European civil society (pp. 143–162). London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836682 - Ruzza, C. (2015). Changes in the field of EU civil society organizations: Institutionalisation, differentiation and challengers. In H. Johansson, & S. Kalm (Eds.), EU civil society: Patterns of cooperation, competition and conflict (pp. 23–42). London: Palgrave.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500724 - Saurugger, S. (2016). Democratic ‘misfit’? Conceptions of civil society participation in France and the European Union. Political Studies, 55(2), 384–404.
https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.2007.00662.x - Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford: Osford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001 - Titley, G. (2014). After the end of multiculturalism: Public service media and integrationist imaginaries for the governance of difference. Global Media and Communication, 10(3), 247–260.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1742766514552351 - Van Dyck, B. (2019). Why not anti-populist parties? Theory with evidence from the Andes and Thailand. Comparative Politics, 51(3), 361–388.
- Wodak, R. (2017). Doing politics’ in the European Parliament. In G. Clemens (Ed.), The quest for Europeanization: Interdisciplinary perspectives on a multiple process (pp. 187–206). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
- Agenda Europe. (2021). Agenda Europe. [blog]. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
https://agendaeurope.wordpress.com - European Roma Grassroots Organizations. (2021). ERGO. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
https://www.mediavoice.eu/en/soho_portfolio/ergo/ - European Women's Lobby. (2021). European women's lobby: Together for a feminist Europe. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
https://womenlobby.org/?lang=en - FEMYSO. (2018, November 30). CDDH: Protection and promotion of the civil society space in Europe. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
https://femyso.org/cddh-protection-and-promotion-of-the-civil-society-space-in-europe/ - International Lesbian and Gay Association. (2021). ILGA-Europe. Retrieved January 21, 2021,
https://www.ilga-europe.org - Observatory on Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians in Europe. (2021). About us. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
https://www.intoleranceagainstchristians.eu/about-us/#aboutUs - Ordo Iuris. (2019, November 13). A stand for the defence of life and family at the United Nations forum: Ordo Iuris is participating in the Nairobi Summit.
http://en.ordoiuris.pl/life-protection/stand-defence-life-and-family-united-nations-forum-ordo-iuris-participating-nairobi - Ordo Iuris. (2021). International Activity. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from
http://en.ordoiuris.pl/international-activity