A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure
References
- Althaus, S. L. (2006). False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443651
- Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2015). More a symptom than a cause: Polarization and partisan news media in America. In J. A. Thurber, & A. Yoshinaka (Eds.), American Gridlock: The sources, character, and impact of political polarization (pp. 309–336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316287002.016
- Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
- Barberá, P. (2015, September 3–6). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. [Conference presentation]. Annual Meeting of the 2015 American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California. http://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdf
- Beam, M. A. (2014). Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research, 41(8), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213497979
- Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 940–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783
- Bos, L., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0155112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155112
- Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10612–10617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114
- Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization (No. w26669). Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26669
- Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology, 17, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y
- Bruns, A. (2019a). Are filter bubbles real? Oxford: Polity Press.
- Bruns, A. (2019b). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426
- Chitra, U., & Musco, C. (2020). Analyzing the impact of filter bubbles on social network polarization. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 115–123). Houston, Texas: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3336191.3371825
- Choi, J., & Lee, J. K. (2015). Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.029
- Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011, July 17–21). Political polarization on Twitter [Conference presentation]. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2847/3275
- Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11–33). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cowan, S. K., & Baldassarri, D. (2018). “It could turn ugly”: Selective disclosure of attitudes in political discussion networks. Social Networks, 52, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.04.002
- Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3
- D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2006). The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice processes. In R. W. Preiss (Ed.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 103–118). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Davies, H. C. (2018). Redefining filter bubbles as (escapable) socio-technical recursion. Sociological Research Online, 23(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418763824
- Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
- Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016). The political environment on social media. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/
- Erasmus, D., & Barker, W. W. (2001). The adages of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and heterogeneity of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
- Fischer, P., Lea, S., Kastenmüller, A., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, J., & Frey, D. (2011). The process of selective exposure: Why confirmatory information search weakens over time. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 114(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.09.001
- Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
- Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017a). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
- Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017b). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
- Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol.19, pp. 41–80). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
- Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
- Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044
- Graham, G. (2017). Behaviorism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/behaviorism/
- Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
- Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
- Hansson, S. O., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Preferences. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/preferences/
- Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701
- Hart, W., Richardson, K., Tortoriello, G. K., & Earl, A. (2019). “You are what you read:” Is selective exposure a way people tell us who they are? British Journal of Psychology, 111(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12414
- Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y
- Jensen, K. B., & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Five traditions in search of the audience. European Journal of Communication, 5, 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323190005002005
- Kahan, D. M., Landrum, A., Carpenter, K., Helft, L., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Science curiosity and political information processing. Political Psychology, 38, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12396
- Kearney, M. W. (2019). Analyzing change in network polarization. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1380–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818822813
- Kim, M.-S., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, part 2. Communication Research, 20(3), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003001
- Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771359
- Lakatos, I. (1999). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical papers volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621123
- Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12077
- Malinas, G., & Bigelow, J. (2016). Simpson's paradox. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/paradox-simpson/
- Matsa, K. E., Silver, L., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2018, October). A minority in all eight countries say the news they see on social media reflects their own political views. Pew Research Center's journalism project. https://www.journalism.org/2018/10/30/younger-europeans-are-far-more-likely-to-get-news-from-social-media/pj_2018-10-30_europe-age_0-08/
- Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
- Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761515
- Munson, S. A., & Resnick, P. (2010). Presenting diverse political opinions: How and how much. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1457–1466). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753543
- Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x
- Möller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & van Es, B. (2018). Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076
- Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.
- Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
- Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute digital news report 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
- Newton, C. (2016, November 16). The author of The Filter Bubble on how fake news is eroding trust in journalism. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/16/13653026/filter-bubble-facebook-election-eli-pariser-interview
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.
- Perry, D. K. (1988). Implications of a contextualist approach to media-effects research. Communication Research, 15(3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015003002
- Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
- Settanni, M., Azucar, D., & Marengo, D. (2018). Predicting individual characteristics from digital traces on social media: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(4), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0384
- Shackel, N. (2005). The vacuity of postmodernist methodology. Metaphilosophy, 36(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00370.x
- Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., & Lin, J.-H. T. (2018). What predicts selective avoidance on social media? A study of political unfriending in Hong Kong and Taiwan. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(8), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218764251
- Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 464–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x
- Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
- Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Sülflow, M., Schäfer, S., & Winter, S. (2018). Selective attention in the news feed: An eye-tracking study on the perception and selection of political news posts on Facebook. New Media & Society, 21(1), 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818791520
- The Daily Dish. (2010, October). The filter bubble. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2010/10/the-filter-bubble/181427/
- Trilling, D., Klingeren, M. van, & Tsfati, Y. (2017). Selective exposure, political polarization, and possible mediators: Evidence from the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw003
- Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Strömbäck, J., Vliegenthart, R., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020). Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: Literature review and synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1759443
- Urman, A. (2019). Context matters: Political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541
- Vinnova. (2017, October 26). Unikt samarbete ska motverka falska nyheter inför valet [A unique collaboration will counteract fake news prior to the election]. [press release]. Vinnova. https://www.vinnova.se/nyheter/2017/10/unikt-samarbete-ska-motverka-falska-nyheter-infor-valet/
- Vraga, E., Bode, L., & Troller-Renfree, S. (2016). Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443
- Webster, J. G. (2017). Three myths of digital media. Convergence, 23(4), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517700385
- Weeks, B. E., Ksiazek, T. B., & Holbert, R. L. (2016). Partisan enclaves or shared media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170
- Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Trilling, D., Möller, J., Bodó, B., de Vreese, C. H., & Helberger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.401
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 33
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Peter M. Dahlgren, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.