Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Online Surveillance in a Swedish Context: Between acceptance and resistance Cover

Online Surveillance in a Swedish Context: Between acceptance and resistance

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Practices and strategies for protecting privacy (per cent)

Service or strategyYesNoNo answer
VPN23770
A browser that does not save your inquiries (DuckDuckGo, etc.)10891
Private/secret mode in your web browser45541
Disabled location services58411
Encrypted communication (e.g., Tor, Signal)7921
Cover your computer camera37621
Avoid certain services because of how they collect data about you as a user53470
Avoid sharing private material76231
Other22672

[i] Comments: The following question was posed: “Do you knowingly use any of the following services or strategies in order to protect your identity and/or information associated with you?” [Yes/No/No response]. The number of respondents was 954.

Table 2

Acceptance of personal data being stored and shared (per cent)

Condition0–456–10No opinion/No answerMost frequent response
That it is required so that others can develop and give you access to desirable services.491624110 (18%)
That you receive personal, customised offers and search results (based on your previous online activities).69121450 (30%)
That it facilitates some of your online activities (access to various services, online shopping, etc.).51152950 (17%)
That you are able to consent to your data being stored and shared when you choose to use a certain service.331152410 (14%)
That society can benefit from the data about you that is being stored (e.g., to combat criminality/terrorism or achieve health benefits).24155565 (15%)

[i] Comments: The following question was posed: “To what extent would the following conditions increase your acceptance of your personal data being stored and shared when you are online?” [where 0 represents “not at all” and 10 represents “100%”]. For each condition, the table shows the percentage of respondents who marked, respectively, some of the response alternatives 0–4, response alternative 5, or some of the response alternatives 6–10 (or who reported having no opinion or chose not respond). It also shows the response alternative that was most frequently used for each condition and what percentage of the respondents that number represents. The number of respondents was 954.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 193
Published on: Dec 18, 2020
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Coppélie Cocq, Stefan Gelfgren, Lars Samuelsson, Jesper Enbom, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.