Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Establishment versus Newcomers, Critical versus Administrative?: Sketching the structure of the Swedish field of media and communication studies

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Anderson, J. A., & Baym, G. (2004). Philosophies and philosophic issues in communication, 1995–2004. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02647.x
  2. Andersson, M., & Fornäs, J. (2010). Mediekulturperspektivets möjligheter: Ett samtal i kulturaliseringens tecken [The possibilities in the term of media culture: A conversation in the spirit of culturalisation]. Nordicom Information, 32(1), 3–22.
  3. Bolin, G. (2010). Medieforskningens möjligheter: Fältdominans, gränsöverskridanden och konsolidering inom medie-och kommunikationsvetenskapen [The possibilities of media research: Field dominance, interdisciplinarity, and consolidation in media and communication studies]. Nordicom Information, 32(4), 3–7.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Information (International Social Science Council), 14(6), 19–47.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1984).
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1980).
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Une révolution conservatrice dans l’édition [A conservative revolution in publishing]. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales [Research Acts in Social Sciences], 126(1), 3–28.
  9. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  10. Broady, D. (2002). French prosopography: Definition and suggested readings. Poetics, 30(5–6), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00031-1
  11. Bruhn Jensen, K. (2010). New media, old methods – Internet methodologies and the online/offline divide. In R. Burnett, C. Consalvo, & C. Ess (Eds.), The handbook of Internet studies (pp. 43–58). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
  12. Budd, R. W., & Ruben, B. D. (Eds.) (1972). Approaches to human communication. Rochelle Park, New Jersey: Hayden.
  13. Börjesson, M. (2016). Sociala kartor över utbildningslandskapet: Installationsföreläsning, professuren i utbildningssociologi vid Uppsala universitet, 11 november 2015 [Social maps of the educational landscape: Installation lecture: Professorship in the sociology of education at Uppsala University, 11 November 2015]. Sociologisk forskning, 53(4), 421–436. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24898976
  14. Börjesson, M., & Broady, D. (2016). Elite strategies in a unified system of higher education: The case of Sweden. L’Annee sociologique, 66(1), 115–146.
  15. Carlsson, U. (Ed.) (2003a). Mångfald i medieforskningen [Diversity in media research]. Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
  16. Carlsson, U. (2003b). Några inledande ord [Some introductory words]. In U. Carlsson (Ed.), Mångfald i medieforskningen [Diversity in media research] (pp. 7–10). Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
  17. Carlsson, U. (2007). Media and mass communication research past, present and future: Reflections from a Nordic horizon. Nordicom Review, 28, 169–181.
  18. Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
  19. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication theory, 9(2), 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
  20. Craig, R. T. (2015). The constitutive metamodel: A 16-year review. Communication Theory, 25(4), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12076
  21. Demeter, M. (2018). Theorizing international inequalities in communication and media studies: A field theory approach. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 6(2), 92–110. https:www.doi.org/10.17646/KOME.75692.94
  22. Demeter, M. (2019a). The winner takes it all: International inequality in communication and media studies today. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018792270
  23. Demeter, M. (2019b). So Far, Yet So Close: International career paths of communication scholars from the Global South. International Journal of Communication, 13, 578–602.
  24. Duval, J. (2016). Le Cinéma au XXe siècle: Entre loi du marché et règles de l’art [Cinema in the twentieth century: Between market law and rules of the art]. Paris: CNRS editions.
  25. Duval, J. (2018). Correspondence analysis and Bourdieu's approach to statistics. In T. Medvetz, & J. J. Sallaz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 512–527). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Esaiasson, P. (2003). Omedvetna kommunikationsforskare? [Unaware communication researchers?]. In U. Carlsson (Ed.) (2003). Mångfald i medieforskningen [Diversity in media research] (pp. 35–40). Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
  27. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Freelon, D. (2013). Co-citation map of 9 comm journals, 2003–2013. Retrieved May 29, 2020, from http://dfreelon.org/2013/09/05/co-citation-map-of-9-comm-journals-2003-2013/
  29. Goldman, H. (1994). From social theory to sociology of knowledge and back: Karl Mannheim and the sociology of intellectual knowledge production. Sociological Theory, 12(3), 266–278. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/202125
  30. Göransson, A. (Ed.). (2007). Maktens kön [The gender of power]. Stockholm: Nya Doxa.
  31. Hjellbrekke, J. (2018). Multiple correspondence analysis for the social sciences. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315516257
  32. Hovden, J. F. (2008). Profane and sacred: A study of the Norwegian journalistic field. Bergen: The University of Bergen.
  33. Hyvönen, M. (2015). Mediekritik i pocketformat: Massmedieproblem i debattböcker 1965–1975 [Media criticism in pocketbook format 1965–1975]. In M. Hyönen, P. Snickars, & P. Vesterlund, (Eds.), Massmedieproblem: Mediestudiets formering [Mass media problems: The formation of media studies] (pp. 278–330). Lund, Sweden: Mediehistoria.
  34. Hyvönen, M., Snickars, P., & Vesterlund, P. (2018). The formation of Swedish media studies, 1960–1980. Media History, 24(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2016.1270751
  35. Höijer, B. (2003). Mångfald i medievetenskapen [Diversity in media research]. In U. Carlsson (Ed.), Mångfald i medieforskningen [Diversity in media research](pp. 63–70). Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
  36. Jansson, A. (2003). Tids nog märker man att man vill göra något eget: Om forskarens självförverkligande och fältets förvandling [Time enough you notice that you want to do something on your own: About the researcher's self-realisation and the field's transformation]. In U. Carlsson (Ed.), Mångfald i medieforskningen [Diversity in media research] (pp. 99–107). Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
  37. Katz, E., Durham Peters, J., Liebes, T., & Orloff, A. (Eds.). (2003). Canonic texts in media research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  38. Katz, E., & Katz, R. (2016). Revisiting the origin of the administrative versus critical research debate. Journal of Information Policy, 6(1), 4–12. https://www.doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0004
  39. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  40. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory of life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University.
  41. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1941). Remarks on administrative and critical communications research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 9(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.5840/zfs1941912
  42. Lebaron, F. (2009). How Bourdieu “quantified” Bourdieu: The geometric modelling of data. In K. Robson, & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 11–29). Dordrecht: Springer.
  43. Lindell, J., Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2020). The field of television production: Genesis, structure and position-takings. Advance online publication. Poetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101432
  44. Littlejohn, S. W. (1982). An overview of contributions to human communication theory from other disciplines. In F. E. X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory: Comparative essays (pp. 243–285). New York: Harper & Row.
  45. Lundgren, L. (2011). You know nothing of my work! Tankar om medie- och kommunikationsvetenskapens historia [Thoughts on the history of media and communication science]. Nordicom Information, 11(3), 75–81.
  46. Qui, J. L., & Fuchs, C. (Eds.) Ferments in the field: The past, present and futures of communication studies [special issue]. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 219–451.
  47. Rossier, T. (2019). Prosopography, networks, life course sequences, and so on: Quantifying with or beyond Bourdieu? Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 144(1), 6–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106319880148
  48. Sapiro, G. (2002). The structure of the French literary field during the German Occupation (1940–1944): A multiple correspondence analysis. Poetics, 30(5–6), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00032-3
  49. Waisbord, S. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. Cambridge: Polity.
  50. Weibull, L. (2015). Medieämnets etablering i Sverige [The formation of media studies in Sweden]. In M. Hyönen, P. Snickars, & P. Vesterlund (Eds.), Massmedieproblem: Mediestudiets formering [Mass media problems: The formation of media studies] (pp. 125–163). Lund, Sweden: Mediehistoria.
  51. Wiedemann, T., & Meyen, M. (2016). Internationalization through Americanization: The expansion of the international communication association's leadership to the world. International Journal of Communication, 10(21), 1489–1509.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 109 - 125
Published on: Jun 17, 2020
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Johan Lindell, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.