Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights standards Cover

Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights standards

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. ARTICLE 19. (2016). EU: European Commission’s code of conduct for countering illegal hate speech online and the framework decision. (Legal Analysis). London. https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38430/EU-Code-of-conduct-analysis-FINAL.pdf
  2. Balkin, J. M. (2017). Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. UC Davies Law Review 51, 1149.
  3. BBC News. (2016). Facebook u-turn over “napalm girl” photograph. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37318040
  4. Bickert, M. (2018, April 24). Publishing our internal enforcement guidelines and expanding our appeals process. Facebook News. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/
  5. Brown, I. (2010). Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights. Index on Censorship 1, 98–106.
  6. BSR (2014). Legitimate and meaningful: Stakeholder engagement in human rights due diligence. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/engaging-with-rights-holders
  7. Callamard, A. (2019). The human rights obligations of non-state actors. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 191–225). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  8. Cooke, L. (2007). Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506072163
  9. Dangerous Speech Project. (2020). We study dangerous speech and ways to counteract it. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://dangerousspeech.org
  10. Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). (2017). Hadefulde ytringer i den offentlige debat [Hate speech in the online public debate]. (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/udgivelser/ligebehandling_2017/rapport_hadefulde_ytringer_online_2017.pdf
  11. Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). (2019). Demokratisk deltagelse på Facebook [Democratic participation on Facebook]. (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/04_april_19/Rapport%20om%20demokratisk%20deltagelse.pdf
  12. DR Medieforskning. (2018). Medieudvikling 2018 [Media development 2018]. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/fakta-om-dr/medieforskning/medieudviklingen/2018
  13. European Parliament, Council of the European Union (EPCO). (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj
  14. European Commission (EC). (2000). Directive on electronic commerce (2000/31/EC). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTML
  15. European Commission (EC). (2016). EU code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-andxenophobia/countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en
  16. European Commission (EC). (2017). Tackling illegal content online: Towards an enhanced responsibility of online platforms (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-tackling-illegal-content-online-towards-enhanced-responsibility-online-platforms
  17. European Commission (EC). (2018a). Commission recommendation (EU) 2018/334 of 1 March 2018 on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online (Official Journal of the European Union L63/50). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0334&from=FR
  18. European Commission (EC). (2018b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. COM (2018) 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:dc0b5b0f-b65f-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  19. European Council. (2008). Council framework decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008F0913&from=EN
  20. Facebook transparency. (2020). Community standards enforcement report. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcement
  21. Frydman, B., Hennebel, L., & Lewkowicz, G. (2009). Public strategies for Internet co-regulation in the United States, Europe and China. In E. Brousseau, M. Marzouki, & C. Meadel (Eds.), Governance, regulations and powers on the internet (pp. 133–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. German Law Review. (2017). Network enforcement act. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1245
  23. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  24. GOV.UK. (2019, April 8). Closed consultation: Online harms white paper. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper
  25. Hope, C., & McCann, K. (2017, September 19). Google, Facebook and Twitter told to take down terror content within two hours or face fines. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/19/googlefacebook-twitter-told-take-terror-content-within-two/
  26. ICCPR (1966, December 16). International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
  27. Jørgensen, R. F. (2013). Framing the net: The Internet and human rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  28. Jørgensen, R. F. (2017). Framing human rights: Exploring storytelling within internet companies. Information, Communication & Society 21(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233
  29. Jørgensen, R. F. (2018). Human rights and private actors in the online domain. In M. K. Land, & J. D. Aronson (Eds.), New technologies for human rights law and practice (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Jørgensen, R. F. (Ed.). (2019) Human Rights in the Age of Platforms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  31. Jørgensen, R. F., & Pedersen, A. M. (2017). Online service providers as human rights arbiters. In M. Taddeo, & L. Floridi (Eds.), The responsibilities of online service providers (pp. 179–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Jørgensen, R. F., Pedersen, A. M., Benedek, W., & Nindler, R. (2015, November 30). Case study on ICT and human rights (policies of EU) (Work package no. 2 – deliverable no. 3). European Commission. http://www.fp7-frame.eu
  33. Jørgensen, R. F., Veiberg, C. B., & ten Oever, N. (2019). Exploring the role of HRIA in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector. In N. Götzmann (Ed.), Handbook on human rights impact assessment (pp. 205–218). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  34. Kaye, D. (2016). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. (A/HRC/32/38). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/32/38
  35. Kaye, D. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/38/35). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/ContentRegulation.aspx
  36. Kaye, D., Cannataci, J., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2018, December 7). Mandates of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the special rapporteur on the right to privacy and the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (Reference: OL OTH 71/2018). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=24234
  37. Keller, D. (2018). Internet platforms: Observations on speech, danger, and money (Aegis series paper no. 1807). A Hoover Institution essay, Stanford University, California. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/files/publication/files/381732092-internet-platforms-observations-on-speech-danger-and-money.pdf
  38. Kerr, A., Musiani, F., & Pohle, J. (2019). Communication and internet policy: A critical rights-based history and future. Internet Policy Review, 8(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3434969
  39. Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598–1670.
  40. Korff, D. (2014). The rule of law on the Internet and in the wider digital world (Issue paper). Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/cybersecurity-capacity/system/files/70114_Rule%20of%20Law%20on%20the%20Internet_web.pdf
  41. Laidlaw, E. (2015). Regulating speech in cyberspace: Gatekeepers, human rights and corporate responsibility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721
  42. Land, M. K. (2019). Regulating private harms online: Content regulation under human rights law. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 285–316). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  43. MacKinnon, R., Hickok, E., Bar, A., & Lim, H. (2014). Fostering freedom online: The role of Internet intermediaries. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231162
  44. Maclay, C. M. (2014). An improbable coalition: How businesses, non-governmental organizations, investors and academics formed the global network initiative to promote privacy and free expression online. (A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:336802/fulltext.pdf
  45. Moore, M. (2016, April). Tech giants and civic power. Centre for the study of Media, Communication & Power, King’s College London. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/cmcp/tech-giants-and-civic-power.pdf
  46. Pillay, N. (2014). The right to privacy in the digital age (A/HRC/27/37). The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
  47. Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 15(7), 751–760.
  48. Ranking Digital Rights. (2019). 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/
  49. Riis, T., & Schwemer, S. F. (2019). Leaving the European safe harbor, sailing toward algoritmic content regulation. Journal of Internet Law, 22(7), 11–21.
  50. Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  51. Santa Clara Principles. (2018). The Santa Clara principles on transparency and accountability in content moderation. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://santaclaraprinciples.org
  52. Šimonovic, D. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). United Nations, Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160?ln=en
  53. Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  54. Tambini, D., Leonardi, D., & Marsden, C. (2008). Codifying cyberspace: Communications self-regulation in the age of Internet convergence. New York: Routledge.
  55. United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRCom). (2004, March 29). General comment no. 31 [80]: The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on state parties to the covenant (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13). https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13
  56. United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011, March 21). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. (Report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/issues/business/A.HRC.17.31.pdf
  57. United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2012, July 16). The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet (A/HRC/20/8). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/731540?ln=en
  58. van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  59. Wagner B., Kettemann, M. C., & Vieth, K. (Eds.). (2019). Research handbook on human rights and digital technology: Global politics, law and international relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  60. York, J. C., & Zuckerman, E. (2019). Moderating the public sphere. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human Rights in the Age of Platforms (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  61. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 67
Published on: Mar 3, 2020
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Rikke Frank Jørgensen, Lumi Zuleta, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.