Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Local Democracy and the Media Cover
By: Lottie Jangdal  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. Almgren, S. M. & Olsson, T. (2015). Let’s get them involved... to some extent: Analyzing online news participation. Social Media + Society 1(2): 1−11 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621934
  2. Baker, E. (2007). Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Barnett, S. & Townend, J. (2015). Plurality, Policy and the Local. Journalism Practice 9(3): 332−349.
  4. Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(15): 524−538.
  5. Buch, R. & Svith, F. (2013). Hvordan trives ytringsfriheden i det regionale demokrati? [How does freedom of expression flourish in regional democracy?]. In E. Hansen (ed.), Ytringsfrihed til forhandling [Freedom of speech for negotiation] (pp. 115−142). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  6. Cape Digital Foundation (2017). Global Digital Overview 2017 – Facts and Figures. [online]. Retrieved from < http://digitalfoundation.org.za/global-digital-overview-2017-facts-figures/> [accessed 2018, October 22].
  7. Carson, A., Muller, D., Martin, J. & Simons, M. (2016). A new symbiosis? Opportunities and challenges to hyperlocal journalism in the digital sge. Media International Australia, 161(1): 132−146.
  8. Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cook, C., Geels, K. & Bakker, P. (2016, October 27). Hyperlocal revenues in the UK and Europe. Mapping the road to sustainability and resilience. Nesta [online]. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/hyperlocal-revenues-uk-and-europe [accessed 2017, November 1].
  10. Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy New Haven: Yale University Press.
  11. Dahl, R. A. (1999). The shifting boundaries of democratic governments. Social Research 66(3): 915−931.
  12. Dahl, R. A. (2000). A democratic paradox? Political Science Quarterly 115(1): 35−40.
  13. Dahlgren, P. (2009). The troubling evolution of journalism. In B. Zelitzer (ed.), The changing faces of journalism. Tabloidization, technology and truthiness (pp. 146−161). New York: Routledge.
  14. European Commission (2016a). Sverige är tredje bäst på digitalisering i EU [Sweden is the third best country on digitalisation in EU]. [online]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/sweden/node/763_en [accessed, 2018, October 22].
  15. European Commission (2016b). Country information – Sweden. [online]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/country-information-sweden [accessed , 2018, October 22].
  16. Findahl, O. & Davidsson, P. (2016). Svenskarna och sociala medier 2016 Internetstiftelsen i Sverige. [Swedes and social media 2016. The Internet Foundation in Sweden]. [online]. Retrieved from < https://www.iis.se/fakta/svenskarna-och-sociala-medier-2016/> [accessed , 2018, October 22].
  17. Firmstone, J. (2016). Mapping changes in local news. Journalism Practice, 10(7): 928−938.
  18. Firmstone, J. & Coleman, S. (2014). The changing role of the local news media in enabling citizens to engage in local democracies. Journalism Practice 8(5): 596−606.
  19. Gandour, R. (2016). Journalism and democracy facing common risks and challenges. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 5(1): 71−77.
  20. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society Cambridge, Massachusetts: Polity Press.
  21. Hansen, E. (2015). The positive freedom of the public sphere. Journalism Studies 16(6): 767−781.
  22. Harte, D., Turner, J. & Williams, A. (2016). Discourses of enterprise in hyperlocal community news in the UK. Journalism Practice 10(2): 233−250.
  23. Harte, D., Williams, A. & Turner, J. (2017). Reciprocity and the hyperlocal journalist. Journalism Practice 11(2−3): 160−176.
  24. Hess, K. & Waller, L. (2016). Hip to be hyper: The subculture of excessively local news. Digital Journalism 4(2): 193−210.
  25. Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J. & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller? European Journal of Communication, 28(1): 19−34.
  26. Jordbruksverket (2015). Så här definierar vi landsbygd [This is how we define rural areas]. [online]. Retrieved from <http://www.jordbruksverket.se/etjanster/etjanster/landsbygdsutveckling/alltomlandet/sahardefinierarvilandsbygd.4.362991bd13f31cadcc256b.html> [accessed 2018, October 22].
  27. Kurpius, D. D., Metzgar, E. T. & Rowley, K. M. (2010). Sustaining hyperlocal media. In search of funding models. Journalism Studies 11(3): 359−376.
  28. Lacy, S. R., Rife, D., Thorson, E. & Dufy, M. (2009). Examining the features, policies, and resources of citizen journalism: Citizen News sites and blogs. Web Journal of Mass Communication Research 15(1). [online]. Retrieved from <https://www.scripps.ohiou.edu/wjmcr/vol15/> [accessed 2018, October 22].
  29. Leckner, S. & Nygren, G. (2016). Det lokala och hyperlokala medielandskapet: nyhetspublicering utanför de etablerade medierna [The local and hyperlocal media landscape: New publishing outside of legacy media]. In L. Truedson (ed.), Mediestudiers årsbok 2015/2016: tillståndet för journalistiken [Mediestudier’s year book 2015/2016: The state of journalism] (pp. 42–85). Stockholm: Institutet för mediestudier.
  30. Leckner, S., Tenor, C. & Nygren, G. (2017). What about the hyperlocals? Journalism Practice 8 Nov 2017: 1−22.
  31. Loader, B. D. & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Information, Communication & Society 14(6): 757−769.
  32. Metzgar, E. T., Kurpius, D. D. & Rowley, K. M. (2011). Defining hyperlocal media: Proposing a framework for discussion. New Media & Society 13(5): 772−787.
  33. Nord, L. & Strömbäck, J. (2004). Journalistik, medier och demokrati [Journalism media and democracy]. In L. Nord & J. Strömbäck, (eds.). Medierna och demokratin [Media and democracy] (pp. 11–46). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  34. Nordicom (2017). Tillgång till medier i hemmet 1995−2016 [Access to media at home 1995−2016]. [online]. Retrieved from < http://nordicom.gu.se/sv/statistik-fakta/mediestatistik> [accessed 2018, October 22].
  35. Nygren, G., Leckner, S. & Tenor, C. (2017). Hyperlocals and legacy media: Media ecologies in transition. Nordicom Review, 39(1): 33−49.
  36. Ohlsson, J. (2016). Den svenska mediemarknaden 2016. Ägare, företag, medier. [The Swedish media market 2016. Owners, companies, media]. Göteborg: Nordicom.
  37. Pavlik, J. (2013). Trends in new media research: A critical review of recent scholarship. Sociology Compass, 7(1): 1−12.
  38. Radcliffe, D. (2012). Here and now: UK hyperlocal media today London: Nesta, Centre for Community Journalism.
  39. Radcliffe, D. (2015). Where are we now? UK hyperlocal media and community journalism in 2015 London: Nesta, Centre for Community Journalism.
  40. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2016). Digital news report 2016. [online]. Retrieved from < http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2016/sweden-2016/> [accessed 2018, October 22]
  41. Staunstrup, P. (2017). Internet och sociala medier 2017 – nya globala siffror [Internet and social media 2017 – new global numbers]. [online]. Retrieved from <http://staunstrup.se/blog/digitalt/internet-och-socialamedier-2017-nya-globala-sifror/> [accessed 2018, October 22].
  42. Tenor, C. (2016). Kommunerna om lokala medier som medspelare och motpart [The municipalities about local media as partner and counterpart]. In L. Truedson (ed.), Mediestudiers årsbok 2015/2016: Tillståndet för journalistiken 2015/2016 [Yearbook for media studies 2015/2016: The conditions for journalism 2015/2016] (pp. 86−113). Stockholm: Institutet för mediestudier.
  43. Turner, J. (2015). Good dog, bad dog: Exploring audience uses and attitudes to hyperlocal community news media through the prism of banal pet stories. Anthropological Notebooks 21(3): 39−50.
  44. van Kerkhoven, M. & Bakker, P. (2015). Hyperlocal with a mission? Motivation, strategy, engagement. In N. R. Kleis (ed.), Local journalism: The decline of newspapers and the rise of digital media (pp. 185−201). London: I.B Tauris & Co. Ltd.
  45. Weibull, L. & Wadbring, I. (2014). Massmedier. Nya villkor för press, radio och tv i det digitala medielandskapet [Mass media. New conditions for the press, radio and television in the digital media landscape]. Stockholm: Ekerlids.
  46. Williams, A. & Harte, D. (2016). Hyperlocal news. (pp. 280−293) In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo & A, Hermida (eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  47. Williams, A., Harte, D. & Turner, J. (2015). The value of UK hyperlocal community news. Digital Journalism 3(5): 680−703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 83
Published on: Oct 16, 2019
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Lottie Jangdal, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.