References
- Anderson, K., Nafus, D., Rattenbury, T. & Aipperspach, R. (2009). Numbers have qualities too: Experiences with ethno-mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 1: 123–140.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x - Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10218047 - Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Retrieved from
http://site.ebrary.com/id/10582332 - Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6): 716–735. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413368 - boyd, D. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12).
http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1418 - Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2): 181–199. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699 - Carter, S. & Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’05 (pp. 899–908). New York, NY: ACM. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055098 - Cook, J., Laidlaw, J. & Mair, J. (2009). What if there is no elephant? Towards a conception of an un-sited field. In M. A. Falzon (ed.), Multi-sited ethnography, theory, praxis and locality in contemporary social research. New York: Routledge.
- Couldry, N., Livingstone, S. & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement – Beyond the presumption of attention. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J. & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the Internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1): 52–84. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839 - Geddes, A., Parker, C. & Scott, S. (2017). When the snowball fails to roll and the use of “horizontal” networking in qualitative social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 0(0): 1–12. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1406219 - Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–1380.
- Gundelach, P., Nielsen, R. S. & Frederiksen, M. (2014). Mixed methods-forskning, principper og praksis. 1. udgave. Samfundsvidenskabernes metoder <<bind 4=4>>. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
- Hargittai, E. & Karr, C. (2009). WAT R U DOIN? Studying the thumb generation using text messaging. In E. Hargittai (ed.), Methods from the trenches. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from
http://www.kriso.ee/methods-from-trenches-db-9780472070268.html - Hasebrink, U. & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices: A multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9(2): 757–779.
- Heckathorn, D. D. & Cameron, C. J. (2017). Network sampling: From snowball and multiplicity to respondent-driven sampling. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1): 101–119. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevsoc-060116-053556 - Helles, R. (2011). Hverdagslivets nye medier. Dansk Sociologi, 21(3): 49–63.
- Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology, from the telephone to the Internet. Cambridge & Malden. Polity Press.
- Jensen, K. B. (2008). Intermediality. In W. Donsbach (ed.), International encyclopedia of communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Lash, S. & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Ling, R. & Lai, C.-H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, August. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251 - Lull, J. (1980). The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 6(3): 197–209.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1980.tb00140.x - Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24 (1): 95–117.
- Markham, A. N. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Walnut Creek, CA. Altamira Press.
- Markham, T. & Couldry, N. (2007). Tracking the reflexivity of the (dis)engaged citizen: Some methodological reflections. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5): 675–695.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301182 - Marwick, A. E. & boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New edia & Society, 16(7): 1051–1067. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995 - Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S. & Wang, X. (2016). How the world changed social media. Why we post. London: UCL Press. Retrieved from
http://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=604151 - Miller, D. & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
- Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2016). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Milton, Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbdk/detail.action?docID=4586791 - Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4): 327–344.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305 - Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Poels, K., Ijsselsteijn, W. A. & de Kort, Y. (2015). World of Warcraft, the aftermath: How game elements transfer into perceptions, associations and (day)dreams in the everyday life of massively multiplayer online role-playing game players. New Media & Society, 17(7): 1137–1153.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521596 - Radway, J. A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill, US: The University of North Carolina Press. Retrieved from
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10355395 - Silverstone, R. (2006). Domesticating domestication: Reflections on the life of a concept. In T. Berker, Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. J. (eds.), Domestication of media and technology (pp. 229–248). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press. Retrieved from
http://mcgraw-hill.co.uk/openup - Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E. & Morley, D. (1994). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (eds.), Consuming technologies, media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.
- Simon, J. & Ess, C. (2015). The ONLIFE initiative–A concept reengineering exercise. Philosophy & Technology, 28(1): 157–162. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0189-8 . - Slater, D. (2002). Social relationships and identity online and offline. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 533–546). London, UK: Sage Publications. Retrieved from
http://www.sagepub.co.uk - Thorhauge, A. M. & Lomborg, S. (2016). Cross-media communication in context: A mixed-methods approach. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 32(60): 16. doi:
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22090 - Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. 1. Touchstone ed. New York, NY: Touchstone.
- Zimmerman, D. H. & Wieder, D. L. (1977). The diary: Diary–interview method. Urban Life, 5(4): 479–498.
https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167700500406 .