References
- Andrejevic, M. (2014). The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8: 1673–1689.
- Andrejevic, M. & Burdon, M. (2015). Defining the sensor society. Television & New Media, 16(1): 19–36.
- Bechmann, A. (2015). Managing the interoperable self. In A. Bechmann & S. Lomborg (eds.), The ubiquitous internet. User and industry perspectives (pp. 54–73). New York & London: Routledge.
- Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6): 985–1002.
- Best, K. (2010). Living in the control society: Surveillance, users and digital screen technologies. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(1): 5–24.
- Cadwalladr, C. & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018, March 17). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian [online]. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election [accessed 2018, March 28]. - Coté, M. (2014). Data motility. The materiality of big social data. Cultural Studies Review, 20(1): 121–149.
- Couldry, N. & Mejias, U. A. (2018). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 1–14. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632 - Couldry, N. & Powell, A. (2014). Big data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society, 1(2): 1–5.
- Crawford, K., Lingel, J. & Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5): 479–496.
- Fiore-Gartland, B. & Neff, G. (2015). Communication, mediation, and the expectations of data: Data valences across health and wellness communities. International Journal of Communication, 9: 1466–1484.
- Kennedy, H. & Hill, L. R. (2017). The feeling of numbers: Emotions in everyday engagements with data and their visualisation. Sociology, 1–19, pre-publication.
- Kennedy, H., Hill, R. L., Allen, W. & Kirk, A. (2016). Engaging with (big) data visualizations: Factors that affect engagement and resulting new definitions of effectiveness. First Monday, 21(11).
- Kitchin, R. & Laurialt, T. (2014). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. Pre-print version of chapter to be published in J. Thatcher, J. Eckert & A. Shears (eds.), Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research. University of Nebraska Press. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267867447 . [accessed 2018, March 27]. - Kubitschko, S. & Kaun, A. (2016). An introduction to innovative methods in media and communication research. In S. Kubitschko & A. Kaun (eds.), Innovative methods in media and communication research (pp. 1–12). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lanier, J. (2018). Ten arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
- Lewis, P. (2017, October 6). “Our minds can be hijacked”: The tech insiders who fear a smartphone dystopia. The Guardian [online]. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smart-phone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopia?CMP=share_btn_fb [accessed 2017, November 4]. - Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1): 101–122.
- Lynley, M. (2018, May 8). Google rolls out app time management controls. TechCrunch [online]. Retrieved from
https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/08/android-rolls-out-a-suite-of-time-management-controls-to-promote-more-healthy-app-usage/ [accessed 2018, October 16]. - Mayer-Schönberger, V. & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Michael, M. & Lupton, D. (2016). Toward a manifesto for the “public understanding of big data”. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 104–116.
- Nafus, D. & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: The Quantified Self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8: 1784–1794.
- Nguyen, D. H. & Mynatt, E. D. (2002). Privacy mirrors: Understanding and shaping socio-technical ubiquitous computing systems. Everyday Computing Lab, College of Computing and GVU Center, Georgia Institute of Technology. Retrieved from
ftp://130.207.127.123/pub/groups/gvu/tr/2002/2002-2016.pdf . [Accessed 2018, February 18]. - Parviainen, J. (2016). Quantified bodies in the checking loop: Analysing the choreographies of biomonitoring and generating big data. Human Technology, 12(1): 56–73.
- Perez, S. (2018, June 4). Apple unveils a new set of “digital wellness” features for better managing screen time. TechCrunch [online]. Retrieved from
https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/04/apple-unveils-a-new-setof-digital-wellness-features-for-better-managing-screen-time/ [accessed 2018, October 16]. - Pink, S. & Fors, V. (2017). Being in a mediated world: Self-tracking and the mind-body-environment. Cultural Geographies, 24(3): 375–388.
- Pybus, J., Coté, M. & Blanke, T. (2015). Hacking the social life of big data. Big Data & Society, 2(2): 1–10.
- Rooksby, J., Parvin, A., Rost, M., Morrison, A. & Chalmers, M. (2016). Personal tracking of screen time on digital devices. Paper presented at CHI’16, 2016, May 7–12, San Jose, USA.
- Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4, 68–84.
- Saariketo, M. (2015). Neuvotteluja sosiaalisen median arkkitehtuurisesta vallasta. Käyttäjien ja ei-käyttäjien suhtautuminen Facebookiin teknologiavälitteisenä tilana [Negotiations on the architectural power of social media. How users and non-users view Facebook as a technologically mediated space]. Media & Viestintä, 38(3): 128–146.
- Sharon, T. & Zandbergen, D. (2017). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11): 1695–1709.
- Smart, V. & Grundig, T. (2017, November 3). “We’re designing minds”: Industry insider reveals secrets of addictive app trade. CBC News [online]. Retrieved from
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/marketplace-phones-1.4384876 [accessed 2017, November 4]. - Smith, G. J. D. (2018). Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices. Big Data & Society, 5(1): 1–15.
- The Economist. (2017, May 6). The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data. [online]. Retrieved from
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21721656-data-economy-demands-new-approach-antitrust-rules-worlds-most-valuable-resource [accessed 2017, August 14]. - Thompson, N. (2017, July 26). Our minds have been hijacked by our phones. Tristan Harris wants to rescue them. Wired [online]. Retrieved from
https://www.wired.com/story/our-minds-have-been-hijacked-byour-phones-tristan-harris-wants-to-rescue-them/ [accessed 2017, November 4]. - Thrift, N. (2004). Remembering the technological unconscious by foregrounding knowledges of position. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22: 175–190.
- Thrift, N. & French, S. (2002). The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27(3): 309–335.
- Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2): 197–208.
- Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other. Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information vivilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30: 75–89.