References
- Abu-Jbara, A., Ezra, J. & Radev, D. (2013). Purpose and polarity of citation: Towards NLP-based bibliometrics. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT (pp. 596–606).
- Adamic, L. (2008). The social link. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (eds.). The hyperlinked society (pp. 227–248). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Adamic, L. & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 election: Divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, KDD 2005 (pp. 36–43). Chicago, Illinois: ACM
- Bakshy, E., Messing, E., Adamic, L. et al. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348: 1130–1132.
- Bruns, A. (eds.) (2005). Gatewatching. Collaborative online news production. New York: Peter Lang.
- Dunlap, R. E. & McCright, M. J. (2011). Organized climate change denial (pp. 144–160). In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard & D. Schlosberg (eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
- De Mayer, J. (2013). Towards a hyperlinked society: A critical review of link studies. New Media and Society, 15(5): 737–751.
- Elgesem, D. et al. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9(2): 169–188.
- Elgesem, D. (2017). Polarization in blogging about the Paris meeting on climate change. In G.L. Ciampaglia et al. (eds.) SocInfo 2017, Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (NCS 10539). 1–23. New York: Springer.
- Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition – From brains to culture. Los Angeles: SAGE.
- Guera, P. H. C. et al. (2013). A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries. In Proceedings of the seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Retrieved from
http://www.aaai.org/Library/ICWSM/icwsm13contents.php [Accessed 2018, March 28]. - Himelboim, I., McCreery, S. & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Joutnal of computer-mediated communication, 18(2): 40–60.
- Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 50: 1141–1151.
- Lodge, M. & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lombard, M. et al. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28: 587–604.
- Mann, M. E. (2012). The hockey stick and the climate wars. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49: 65–85.
- Sharman, A. (2014). Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Global environment change, 26: 159–170.
- Sinclair, B. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Sunstein, C. (2017). #republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Thelwall, M. (2006). Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1): 1–147.
- Turner, J. C. et al. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
- Yardi, S. & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5): 316–327.