Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Fall of the Queen of Nordic Skiing: A comparative analysis of the Swedish and Norwegian media coverage of the Therese Johaug scandal Cover

The Fall of the Queen of Nordic Skiing: A comparative analysis of the Swedish and Norwegian media coverage of the Therese Johaug scandal

Open Access
|Feb 2019

References

  1. Adut, A. (2005). A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1): 213–248.
  2. Allern, S. & Pollack, E. (2012) Mediated scandals. In S. Allern & E. Pollack (eds.), Scandalous! The mediated construction of political scandals in four Nordic countries (pp. 9–28). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
  3. Amegashie, J. A. (2006). The 2002 winter Olympics scandal: Rent-seeking and committees. Social Choice and Welfare, 26(1): 183–189.
  4. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the spread and origin of nationalism. London: Verso.
  5. Bairner, A. (2010). What’s Scandinavian about Scandinavian sport? Sport in Society, 13(4): 734–743.
  6. Bairner, A. (2015). Assessing the sociology of sport: On national identity and nationalism. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(4–5): 375–379.
  7. BBC (2015, August 20). Doping in sport: What is it and how is it being tackled? BBC Sport. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/sport/athletics/33997246 [access day 2018, July 14].
  8. Bie, B. & Billings, A. C. (2015). “Too good to be true?”: US and Chinese media coverage of Chinese swimmer Ye Shiwen in the 2012 Olympic Games. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(7): 785–803.
  9. Blackwell, J. (1991). Discourses on drug use: The social construction of a steroid scandal. Journal of Drug Issues, 21(1): 147–164.
  10. Boyle, R. & Haynes, R. (2009). Power play: Sport, the media and popular culture (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  11. Cavalho, A. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society: Rethinking the framework of critical discourse analysis. Journalism Studies, 9(2): 161–177.
  12. Carstairs, C. (2003). The wide world of doping: Drug scandals, natural bodies, and the business of sports entertainment, Addiction Research & Theory, 11(4): 263–281.
  13. Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  14. Christiansen, A. V. (2005). The legacy of Festina: Patterns of drug use in European cycling since 1998. Sport in History, 25(3): 497–514.
  15. Dimeo, P. (2014). Why Lance Armstrong? Historical context and key turning points in the ‘cleaning up’ of professional cycling. International Journal of the History of Sport, 31(8): 951–968.
  16. Efverström, A., Ahmadi, N., Hoff, D. & Bäckström, Å. (2016). Anti-doping and legitimacy: An international survey of elite athletes’ perceptions. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 8(3): 491–514.
  17. Elbe, A.-M. & Overbye, M. (2014). Urine doping controls: The athletes’ perspective. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 6(2): 227–240.
  18. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  19. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  20. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  21. Ferstle, J. (2001). World conference on Doping in Sport. In W. Wilson & E. Derse (eds.), Doping in elite sport (pp. 275–286). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  22. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
  23. Goksøyr, M. (2005). “Og så ein svensk-norsk landskamp! Ein bliver så patriotisk i slike stunder”: Norsksvenske idrettsforbindelser etter 1905 [“And then a Swedish-Norwegian derby! One becomes so patriotic at such times”: Norwegian-Swedish sports relations after 1905]. In Ø. Sørensen & T. Nilsson (eds.), Norsk-svenske relationer i 200 år [Norwegian-Swedish relations for 200 years] (pp. 72–86). Oslo: Aschehoug.
  24. Gotaas, T. (2013). Femmila [50K]. Oslo: Gyldendal.
  25. Grix, J. & Houlihan, B. (2014). Sport mega-events as part of a nation’s soft power strategy: The cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012). The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(4): 572–596.
  26. Hanstad, D. V. (2008). Drug scandal and organizational change within the International Ski Federation: A figurational approach. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(4): 379–398.
  27. Hanstad, D. V., Smith, A. & Waddington, I. (2008). The establishment of the World Anti-Doping Agency: A study of the management of organizational change and unplanned outcome. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(3): 227–249.
  28. Hanstad, D. V., Skille, E. & Loland, S. (2010). Harmonization of anti-doping work: Myth or reality? Sport in Society, 13(3): 418–430.
  29. Hanstad D. V. & Loland, S. (2009). Elite athletes’ duty to provide information on their whereabouts: Justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime? European Journal of Sport Science, 9(1): 3–10.
  30. Hanstad, D. V. & Houlihan, B. (2015). Strengthening global anti-doping policy through bilateral collaboration: The example of Norway and China. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 7(4): 587–604.
  31. Houlihan, B. (2002). Dying to win: Doping in sport and the development of anti-doping policy (2nd ed.). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  32. Houlihan, B. (2004). Civil rights, doping control and the World Anti-Doping Code, Sport in Society, 7(3): 420–437.
  33. Houlihan, B. (2014). Achieving compliance in international anti-doping policy: An analysis of the 2009 World Anti-Doping Code. Sport Management Review, 17(3): 265–276.
  34. Hughes, S. & Shank, M. (2005). Defining scandal in sports: Media and corporate sponsor perspectives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14(4): 207–216.
  35. Kantola, A. & Vesa, J. (2013). Mediated scandals as social dramas: Transforming the moral order in Finland. Acta Sociologica, 56(4): 295–308.
  36. Kinder, P. D. (2018). NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) phenomenon. In R. Kolb (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society (p. 2483). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  37. Kozman, C. (2013). The Tiger Woods scandal in the media: Measuring attribute effects on the public. International Journal of Sport Communication, 6(2): 214–233.
  38. Kristiansen, E. (2017). Norway. In E. Kristiansen, M. M. Parent & B. Houlihan (eds.), Elite sport youth policy and management: A comparative analysis (pp. 80–95). London and New York: Routledge.
  39. Laine, T. (2006). Shame on us: Shame, national identity and the Finnish doping scandal. International Journal of the History of Sport, 23(1): 67–81.
  40. Li, J. (2009). Intertextuality and national identity: Discourse of national conflicts in daily newspapers in the United States and China. Discourse & Society, 20 (1): 85–121.
  41. Li, B., Stokowski, S., Dittmore, S. W. & Scott, O. K. M. (2016). How mediated sporting events constitute nationalism: Chinese newspapers covering the 2014 Incheon Asian Games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(1): 79–96.
  42. McNamee, M. & Tarasti, L. (2010). Juridical and ethical peculiarities in doping policy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(3): 165–169.
  43. Mignon, P. (2003). The Tour de France and the doping issue. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 20(2): 227–245.
  44. Møller, V. (2009). The ethics of doping and anti-doping: Redeeming the soul of sport? London: Routledge.
  45. Møller, V. (2014). Who guards the guardians? The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31(8): 934–950.
  46. Møller, V. (2016). The road to hell is paved with good intentions: A critical evaluation of WADA’s anti-doping campaign. Performance Enhancement & Health, 4(3–4): 111–115.
  47. Rowe, D. (1997). Apollo undone: The sports scandal. In J. Lull & S. Hinerman (eds.), Media scandals: Morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace (pp. 203–221). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  48. Storm, R. & Wagner, U. (2015). The anatomy of the sports scandal: An outline for a theoretical contextualization. International Journal of Sport Communication, 8(3): 293–312.
  49. Tangen, J.-O. (2004). Hvordan er idrett mulig? Skisse til en idrettssociologi. [How is sport possible? An outline for a sociology of sport]. Kristianssand: Høyskola Forlaget.
  50. Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  51. Ungerleider, S. (2001) Faust’s gold: Inside the East German doping machine. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
  52. WADA [World Anti-Doping Agency] (2015). World Anti-Doping Code. Lausanne.
  53. Wagner, U. & Hanstad, D. V. (2011). Scandinavian perspectives on doping: A comparative policy analysis in relation to the international process of institutionalizing anti-doping. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 3(3): 355–372.
  54. Wagner, U. & Pedersen, K. (2014). The IOC and the doping issue: A discursive institutional approach to organizational identity construction. Sport Management Review, 17(2): 160–173.
  55. Wexler, M. (1996). A sociological framing of the NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) syndrome. International Review of Modern Sociology, 26(1): 91–110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 138
Published on: Feb 19, 2019
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Ulrik Wagner, Elsa Kristiansen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.