Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experiences of External Interference Among Finnish Journalists: Prevalence, methods and implications Cover

Experiences of External Interference Among Finnish Journalists: Prevalence, methods and implications

By: Ilmari Hiltunen  
Open Access
|Feb 2019

References

  1. Berkowitz, D. (2009). Reporters and their sources. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 102–115). New York: Routledge.
  2. Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Clark, M. & Grech, A. (2017). Journalists under pressure: Unwarranted interference, fear and self-censorship in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  4. Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompson, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 60(6): 821–836.
  5. Council for Mass Media (2016). Miksi JSN ei julkaise karsittuja kanteluja? [Why CMM does not publicise rejected complaints]. [online]. Retrieved from http://www.jsn.fi/blog/16-8-2016-miksi-jsn-ei-julkaise-karsittuja-kanteluja/. [accessed 2017, September 26].
  6. Council for Mass Media (2017). Guidelines for journalists and an annex. [online]. Retrieved from http://www.jsn.fi/en/guidelines_for_journalists/. [accessed 2017, December 15].
  7. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4): 442–464.
  8. Finnish Newspapers Association (2016). Media-ala puolustaa yhteisvoimin vastuullista sananvapautta [The media industry stands united in defence of responsible freedom of speech]. [online]. Retrieved from http://www.sanomalehdet.fi/ajankohtaista/uutiset/media-ala-puolustaa-yhteisvoimin-vastuullista-sananvapautta-2. [accessed 2016, August 11].
  9. Freedom House (2017). Freedom of the press – United States. [online]. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2017/united-states. [accessed 18 October, 2017].
  10. Haapalainen, M. (2016). JSN: Toimittajien uhkailu vaarantaa sananvapautta [CMM: Intimidation of journalists jeopardises the freedom of speech]. [online]. Retrieved from http://www.journalisti.fi/ajankohtaiset/jsn-toimittajien-uhkailulla-on-laajoja-haittavaikutuksia/. [accessed 11 August, 2016].
  11. Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. The International Communication Gazette, 73(6): 477–494.
  12. Hemánus, P. (1983). Journalistinen vapaus [Journalistic freedom]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
  13. Jann, B. & Hinz, T. (2016). Research question and design for survey research. In C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. Smith & Y-C. Fu (eds.), The SAGE handbook of survey methodology (pp. 105–121). London: Sage.
  14. Kantola, A. & Lounasmeri, L. (2014). Viestinnän ammattilaiset promootioyhteiskunnassa: aktivisteja ja ajatusjohtajia [Communication professionals in a promotion society: Activists and thought leaders]. Media & Viestintä, 37(3): 3–21.
  15. Kodellas, S., Papastavrou, N., Giannakoulopoulos, A. & Koutsompolis, D. (2014). Journalists’ victimization experiences and fear of crime at the workplace: Results of a questionnaire survey from Greece and Cyprus. European Journal of Communication, 29(4): 480–494.
  16. Koivunen, A. (2017). #Sipilägate and the break-up of the political bromance: Crisis in the relationship between Finnish Media and Politicians. Nordicom-Information, 39(1): 44–51.
  17. Krosnick, J. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology (50): 537–567.
  18. Kunelius, R., Noppari, E. & Reunanen E. (2010). Media vallan verkoissa [Media in the networks of power]. Tampere: University of Tampere.
  19. Kunelius, R. (2003). Viestinnän vallassa: johdatusta joukkoviestinnän kysymyksiin [Mesmerised by communication: Introduction to questions of mass communication]. Helsinki: WSOY.
  20. Kuutti, H. (ed.) (2011). Julkisuusjournalismi [Publicity journalism]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
  21. Landsverk-Hagen, A. (2015). Meningers mot – netthat og ytringsfrihet i Norge [The courage of opinions – internet hate and journalistic freedom of expression in Norway]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  22. Löfgren Nilsson, M. (2016). Hoten och hatet mot journalister [Threats and hate towards journalists]. [online]. Retrieved from http://jmg.gu.se/digitalAssets/1577/1577351_jp9-trakasserier-journalister.pdf. [accessed 2017, September 20].
  23. Löfgren Nilsson, M. & Örnebring, H. (2016). Journalism under threat: Intimidation and harassment of Swedish journalists. Journalism Practice, 10(7): 880–890.
  24. Luostarinen, H. (1994). Mielen kersantit: julkisuuden hallinta ja journalistiset vastastrategiat sotilaallisissa konflikteissa [Sergeants of the mind: Publicity control and Journalistic counter-strategies in military conflicts]. Helsinki: Hanki ja Jää.
  25. Luque Martinez, J. (2015). Trolled by the state. British Journalism Review, 26(4): 61–66.
  26. Marttinen, M. (2016) “Hakkaan sinut paskaksi” [“I will beat you to a pulp”]. Journalisti, March 17, 2016. [online]. Retrieved from < https://www.journalisti.fi/artikkelit/2016/4/hakkaan-sinut-paskaksi/>. [accessed 2017, January 18].
  27. Mäntylä, J. (2008). Journalistin etiikka [Journalist ethics]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
  28. Nerone, J. (1994). Violence against the press: Policing the public sphere in U.S. history. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Noppari, E. & Hiltunen, I. (2018). Populistinen vastamedia eliittejä haastamassa [Populist counter media challenging the elites]. In M. Niemi & T. Houni (eds.), Media & populismi – Työkaluja kriittiseen journalismiin [Media & populism – Tools for critical journalism]. (pp. 236–272). Tampere: Vastapaino.
  30. Nord, L. (2008). Comparing the Nordic media systems: North between west and east. Central European Journal of Communication, 1(1): 95–110.
  31. Parker, K. (2015). Aggression against journalists: Understanding occupational intimidation of journalists using comparisons with sexual harassment. Oklahoma: University of Tulsa.
  32. Pietiläinen, T. (2007). Selkeyttä vai sensuuria? [Clarity or censorship?]. In S. Seppä (ed.), Journalismikritiikin vuosikirja 2007 [The yearbook of journalism critique]. (pp. 91–98). Tampere: University of Tampere.
  33. Pöyhtäri, R., Ahva, L. & Väliverronen, J. (2014). Mistä on suomalainen toimittaja tehty? Worlds of journalism – surveyn tuloksia Suomesta [What is the Finnish journalist made of? Worlds of journalism survey results from Finland]. Tampere: University of Tampere.
  34. Reich, Z. & Hanitzsch, T. (2013). Determinants of journalists’ professional autonomy: Individual and national level factors matter more than organizational ones. Mass Communication and Society, 16(1): 133–156.
  35. RSF (2016a). Suomi on jälleen lehdistönvapauden ykkösmaa [Finland is again the number one country for press freedom]. [online]. Retrieved from http://toimittajatilmanrajoja.com/fi/2016/04/20/tie-dote-suomi-jalleen-lehdistonvapauden-ykkosmaa/. [accessed 2016, August 11].
  36. RSF (2016b). Reporters without borders (RSF) remains concerned about actions taken by national broadcaster YLE. [online]. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/news/reporters-without-borders-rsf-remains-concerned-about-actions-taken-national-broadcaster-yle. [accessed 2017, November 15].
  37. RSF (2017). Journalism weakened by democracy’s erosion. [online]. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/journalism-weakened-democracys-erosion. [accessed 2017, October 18].
  38. Shoemaker, P. & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. New York: Longman.
  39. Sivo, S., Saunders, C., Chang, Q. & Jiang, J. (2006). How low should you go? Low response rates and the validity of inference in is questionnaire research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6): 351–414.
  40. Sudman, S. & Kalton, G. (1986). New developments in the sampling of special populations. Annual Review of Sociology, 12: 401–429.
  41. The Union of Journalists in Finland (2017). Join the union. [online]. Retrieved from https://journalistiliitto.fi/en/membership/join-the-union/. [accessed 2017, November 15].
  42. Trottier, D. (2017). Digital vigilantism as weaponisation of visibility. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1): 55–72.
  43. Waisbord, S. (2002). Antipress violence and the crisis of the state. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3): 90–109.
  44. Weaver, D. & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Who sets the agenda for the media? A study of local agenda-building. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 62(1): 87–94.
  45. WJS (2018). The WJS 2012–2016 study. [online]. Retrieved from http://www.worldsofjournalism.org/research/2012-2016-study/. [accessed 2018, January 16].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 21
Published on: Feb 19, 2019
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Ilmari Hiltunen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.