Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“Media Micro-Generations”: How New Technologies Change Our Media Morality Cover

“Media Micro-Generations”: How New Technologies Change Our Media Morality

Open Access
|Dec 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Digital media morality by age groups (mean score)Comments: The dependent variable is a composite index of seven questions regarding different aspects of media morality and digital media use. The items were posed as proposals, where the respondents were requested to agree or disagree with four alternatives (1=agree totally, 2=partly, 3=hardly, 4=not at all). Thus, higher scores indicate more disapproving attitudes than lower scores. Age was measured by using the year of birth that the respondent provided, and missing data were completed by information from the register data in the sample frame. The independent variable was merged into groups of five-year intervals.Source: The National SOM-Survey 2014.
Digital media morality by age groups (mean score)Comments: The dependent variable is a composite index of seven questions regarding different aspects of media morality and digital media use. The items were posed as proposals, where the respondents were requested to agree or disagree with four alternatives (1=agree totally, 2=partly, 3=hardly, 4=not at all). Thus, higher scores indicate more disapproving attitudes than lower scores. Age was measured by using the year of birth that the respondent provided, and missing data were completed by information from the register data in the sample frame. The independent variable was merged into groups of five-year intervals.Source: The National SOM-Survey 2014.

Figure 2

Media morality related to age cohorts. Share of respondents who disagree (per cent)Comments: The independent variable is the year when members of the age cohort entered their formative years (i.e. reached the age of 15). The wording of the questions for the dependent variables was: “To what extent would you consider the following behaviour to be acceptable:” “To tag or check in other persons on social media without permission”; “to talk about your private life on the mobile phone so that other people can hear you” and “to improve pictures of yourself before posting them on social media”. The items were posed as proposals, where the respondents were requested to agree or disagree with four alternatives (agree totally=1, partly=2, hardly=3, not at all=4). In the analysis, the four alternatives were merged into two categories (agree/disagree).Source: The National SOM-Survey 2014.
Media morality related to age cohorts. Share of respondents who disagree (per cent)Comments: The independent variable is the year when members of the age cohort entered their formative years (i.e. reached the age of 15). The wording of the questions for the dependent variables was: “To what extent would you consider the following behaviour to be acceptable:” “To tag or check in other persons on social media without permission”; “to talk about your private life on the mobile phone so that other people can hear you” and “to improve pictures of yourself before posting them on social media”. The items were posed as proposals, where the respondents were requested to agree or disagree with four alternatives (agree totally=1, partly=2, hardly=3, not at all=4). In the analysis, the four alternatives were merged into two categories (agree/disagree).Source: The National SOM-Survey 2014.

Mobile phone accessibility in household (per cent)

19951996199719981999200020012002200320042005
Yes3646576576747989908594
No645443352426211110156

Sum100100100100100100100100100100100
N1,7561,7521,7193,5363,4263,4623,5273,5533,6183,5623,464

Computer accessibility in household (per cent)

198619871988198919901991199219931994
Yes7914131515142023
No939186878585868077

Sum100100100100100100100100100
N1,5911,6401,6191,5681,4861,5261,8381,8471,696

Social media use on the mobile phone (per cent)

Entering formative years<4 times each day>4 times each daySumN
2010–2013742610057
2005–2009683210089
2000–2004465410094
1995–19995347100113
1990–19944654100111
1985–19892971100122
1980–19843169100143
1975–19791585100143
1970–1974793100140
1965–1969793100166
1960–1964694100220
1955–1959298100146
1950–1954010010097
1945–1949010010064
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 95 - 110
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Stina Bengtsson, Bengt Johansson, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.