Have a personal or library account? Click to login
More of the Same or a Different Breed Altogether?: A National Comparison of Role Perceptions and Ethical Stances among Finnish Political Journalists Cover

More of the Same or a Different Breed Altogether?: A National Comparison of Role Perceptions and Ethical Stances among Finnish Political Journalists

Open Access
|May 2018

Figures & Tables

Journalists’ general ethical stances

StatementPolitical journalists (Nmin=80)All other journalists (Nmin=344)General reporters (Nmin=190)News specialists (Nmin=40)
Journalists should always adhere to codes of professional ethics, regardless of situation and context4.65 (.58)4.65 (.60)4.65 (.62)4.78 (.57)
What is ethical in journalism depends on the specific situation2.52 (.1.45)2.62 (1.37)2.66 (1.35)2.30 (1.36)
What is ethical in journalism is a matter of personal judgment2.30 (1.39)2.39 (1.23)2.32 (1.19)2.15 (1.19)
It is acceptable to set aside moral standards if extraordinary circumstances require it2.04 (1.24)1.99 (1.15)2.01 (1.12)1.88 (1.17)
Mean of all answers2.882.912.912.78

Comparisons of political journalists’ stances on ethical practices against other groups, statistically significant differences

PracticeAll other journalistsGeneral reportersNews specialists
Using confidential business or government documents without authorisationPOLJOUR *POLJOUR **
Getting employed in a firm or organisation to gain inside informationOTHERS *GENREP **
Using hidden microphones or cameras
Using re-creations or dramatisations of news by actorsOTHERS **GENREP ***
Claiming to be somebody elseOTHERS *GENREP **
Exerting pressure on unwilling informants to get a storyOTHERS **GENREP ***NEWSSPEC **
Making use of personal documents such as letters and pictures without permission NEWSSPEC *
Publishing stories with unverified content Paying people for confidential informationOTHERS *GENREP *
Altering photographs
Altering or fabricating quotes from sources
Accepting money from sources

Comparisons of political journalists’ role perceptions against other groups, statistically significant differences

RoleAll other journalistsGeneral reportersNews specialists
Provide analysis of current affairsPOLJOUR ***POLJOUR ***
Monitor and scrutinise political leadersPOLJOUR ***POLJOUR ***
Provide information people need to make political decisionsPOLJOUR ***POLJOUR ***POLJOUR **
Report things as they areOTHERS *GENREP *NEWSSPEC *
Be a detached observerOTHERS ***GENREP ***NEWSSPEC *
Monitor and scrutinise business
Promote tolerance and cultural diversityOTHERS *GENREP **
Let people express their viewsOTHERS *GENREP **NEWSSPEC **
Educate the audience
Tell stories about the worldOTHERS ***GENREP ***NEWSSPEC **
Motivate people to participate in political activityPOLJOUR ***POLJOUR ***
Provide the kind of news that attracts the largest audienceOTHERS **GENREP **NEWSSPEC **
Set the political agendaPOLJOUR **
Influence public opinionOTHERS ***GENREP **NEWSSPEC *
Support national developmentOTHERS **GENREP **NEWSSPEC *
Provide advice, orientation and direction for daily lifeOTHERS ***GENREP ***NEWSSPEC ***
Advocate for social changeOTHERS ***GENREP ***NEWSSPEC **
Provide entertainment and relaxationOTHERS ***GENREP ***NEWSSPEC ***
Be an adversary of the government
Convey a positive image of political leadership
Support government policy

Role perceptions of journalists

RolePolitical journalists (Nmin=73)All other journalists (Nmin=326)General reporters (Nmin=183)News specialists (Nmin=37)
Provide analysis of current affairs4.64 (.56)4.28 (.80)4.26 (.80)4.39 (.74)
Monitor and scrutinise political leaders4.61 (.61)3.69 (1.31)3.88 (1.16)4.39 (.80)
Provide information people need to make political decisions4.51 (.78)3.57 (1.26)3.80 (1.09)4.17 (.74)
Report things as they are4.41 (.71)4.56 (.73)4.57 (.74)4.68 (.52)
Be a detached observer4.23 (.77)4.51 (.74)4.54 (.76)4.56 (.63)
Monitor and scrutinise business3.79 (1.12)3.53 (1.25)3.65 (1.15)3.98 (.99)
Promote tolerance and cultural diversity3.64 (.99)3.92 (1.02)4.06 (.95)3.98 (.85)
Let people express their views3.55 (1.03)3.84 (1.02)3.99 (.94)4.12 (.75)
Educate the audience3.48 (.95)3.45 (.99)3.36 (.98)3.43 (.98)
Tell stories about the world3.45 (.99)4.13 (.85)4.10 (.83)4.07 (.66)
Motivate people to participate in political activity3.33 (1.08)2.53 (1.13)2.66 (1.12)3.00 (.98)
Provide the kind of news that attracts the largest audience2.96 (1.05)3.34 (1.01)3.39 (.95)3.56 (1.00)
Set the political agenda2.69 (1.09)2.34 (1.04)2.44 (1.03)2.45 (.93)
Influence public opinion2.59 (.96)3.09 (.98)3.05 (1.00)3.03 (.96)
Support national development2.56 (1.07)2.93 (1.02)2.95 (.98)3.05 (1.19)
Provide advice, orientation and direction for daily life2.46 (.93)3.26 (1.01)3.28 (.87)3.32 (.99)
Advocate for social change2.37 (1.01)2.95 (1.03)2.97 (1.09)3.00 (.93)
Provide entertainment and relaxation2.27 (.96)3.02 (1.08)3.00 (1.01)2.98 (.97)
Be an adversary of the government2.25 (1.10)2.05 (1.06)2.11 (1.08)2.27 (.99)
Convey a positive image of political leadership1.35 (.64)1.23 (.53)1.26 (.57)1.22 (.42)
Support government policy1.13 (.41)1.20 (.45)1.22 (.47)1.23 (.53)
Mean of all answers3.173.223.273.38

Journalists’ opinions on controversial ethical practices

PracticePolitical journalists (Nmin=63)All other journalists (Nmin=313)General reporters (Nmin=177)News specialists (Nmin=38)
Using confidential business or government documents without authorisation1.90 (.47)2.06 (.52)2.08 (.51)1.98 (.52)
Getting employed in a firm or organisation to gain inside information2.30 (.49)2.13 (.55)2.10 (.54)2.15 (.53)
Using hidden microphones or cameras2.32 (.47)2.27 (.52)2.25 (.52)2.22 (.48)
Using re-creations or dramatisations of news by actors2.32 (.59)2.04 (.62)1.99 (.58)2.08 (.63)
Claiming to be somebody else2.49 (.50)2.32 (.52)2.29 (.50)2.40 (.50)
Exerting pressure on unwilling informants to get a story2.53 (.50)2.25 (.63)2.20 (.65)2.20 (.60)
Making use of personal documents such as letters and pictures without permission2.59 (.50)2.69 (.48)2.65 (.51)2.79 (.41)
Publishing stories with unverified content2.64 (.48)2.53 (.55)2.54 (.54)2.60 (.50)
Paying people for confidential information2.73 (.45)2.56 (.52)2.57 (.53)2.58 (.55)
Altering photographs2.82 (.39)2.73 (.47)2.68 (.50)2.80 (.41)
Altering or fabricating quotes from sources2.97 (.16)2.97 (.22)2.97 (.23)3.00 (.00)
Accepting money from sources3.00 (.00)2.99 (.15)2.98 (.21)3.00 (.00)
Mean of all answers2.552.472.482.48

Sampling information

Political journalistsOther journalists
Number of respondents80345
Data collection periodDec. 2013 – Oct. 2014Mar. 2013 – Aug. 2013
Data collection methodOnlinePhone/email
Response rate (%)6150–55*
Average age of respondents (years)5143
Gender distribution in sample (W/M; %)36/6455/45
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 66
Published on: May 26, 2018
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Jari Väliverronen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.