Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From Public Relations to Strategic Communication in Sweden: The Emergence of a Transboundary Field of Knowledge Cover

From Public Relations to Strategic Communication in Sweden: The Emergence of a Transboundary Field of Knowledge

By:  and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. Abdullah, Z., and Treadgold, T.T. (2008) ’The Professionalisation of Public Relations in Malaysia: Perception Management and Strategy Development’.(3), 285–287.
  2. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989) ‘Social identity theory and the organization’.(1), 20–39.
  3. Axley, S. R. (1984) ’Managerial and Organizational Communication in Terms of the Conduit Metaphor’.(3), 428–437.
  4. Bentele, G., and Wehmeier, S. (2003) ’From “Literary Bureaus” to a Modern Profession: The Development and Current Structure of Public Relations in Germany, in Sriramesh, K. and Verčič, D. (eds.),(pp. 199–221). London: Routledge.
  5. Bivins, T.H. (1993) ’Public Relations, Professionalism, and the Public Interest’.,(2), 117–126.
  6. Bowen, S.A. (2009) ’What Communication Professionals Tell Us Regarding Dominant Coalition Access and Gaining Membership’.(4), 418–443.
  7. Broms, H., and Gahmberg, H. (1983) ’Communication to Self in Organizations and Cultures’.(3), 482–495.
  8. de Bussy, N.M., and Wolf, K. (2008) ’The State of Australian Public Relations: Professionalisation and Paradox’.(4), 376–381.
  9. Carey, J. (2009)(rev. ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  10. Carr, P. (1971) ’Public Relations Professionalism’.(4), 6.
  11. Cheney, G. (2000) ’Interpreting Interpretive Research: Toward Perspectivism without Relativism, in Corman, S. and Poole, M. S. (eds.),(pp. 3–45). New York, NY: Guilford.
  12. Cheney, G., and Christensen, L.T. (2001) ’Organizational Identity: Linkages between Internal and External Communication, in Jablin, F.M. and Putnam, L.L. (eds.),(pp. 231–269). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  13. Cheney, G., and Lee Ashcraf, K. (2007) ’Considering “the Professional” in Communication Studies: Implications for Teory and Research within and Beyond the Boundaries of Organizational Communication’.(2), 146–175.
  14. Christensen, L.T., and Cheney, G. (2000) 'self-Absorption and Self-Seduction in the Corporate Identity Game, in Schultz, M., Hatch, M.J. and Larsen, M.H. (eds.),(pp. 246–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Christensen, L.T., and Cornelissen, J. (2011) ’Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future’.(3), 383–414.
  16. Christensen, L.T., Morsing, M., and Cheney, G. (2008). London: Sage.
  17. Cornelissen, J. (2011). London: Sage.
  18. Cutlip, S.M., Center, A.H., and Broom, G.M. (2006)(8. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  19. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1993). Lund: Stu-dentlitteratur.
  20. Dahlen, M., Lange, F., and Smith, T. (2010). Chichester: Wiley.
  21. Davis, A. (2002). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  22. Ewen, S. (1996). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  23. Fairclough, N. (1995). London: Longman.
  24. Falkheimer, J., and Heide, M. (2003). Malmö: Liber.
  25. Falkheimer, J., and Heide, M. (2007). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  26. Falkheimer, J., and Heide, M. (Eds.) (2011). Lund: Studen-tlitteratur.
  27. Fill, C. (2009). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  28. Giddens, A. (1991). Cambridge: Polity press.
  29. Gill, R. (2011) ’Corporate Storytelling as an Efective Internal Public Relations Strategy’.(1), 17–25.
  30. Grant, D. (2004). London: Sage.
  31. Grönroos, C. (2006) ’On Defining Marketing: Finding a New Roadmap for Marketing’.(4), 395–417.
  32. Grönroos, C., and Rubinstein, D. (1986). Malmö: Liber.
  33. Grönstedt, A. (2000). New York, NY: Routledge.
  34. Gummesson, E. (2002)(3 ed.). Malmö: Liber.
  35. Habermas, J. (1968/1987). Cambridge: Polity.
  36. Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., and Sriramesh, K. (2007) ’Defining Strategic Communication’.(1), 3–35.
  37. Heath, R.L. (2001) ’Defining the Discipline, in Heath, R.L. (ed.),(pp. 1–9). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  38. Heath, R.L. (2010) ’Preface, in Heath, R.L. (ed.),(pp. xi–xv). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  39. Hernes, T. (2008). London: Routledge.
  40. Holm, O. (2006) ’Integrated Marketing Communication: From Tactics to Strategy’.(1), 23–33.
  41. Holtzhausen, D.R. (2008) Strategic Communication. In Donsbach, W. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. X, pp. 4848–4855). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  42. Huang, Y.H., and Su, S.H. (2009) ’Public Relations Autonomy, Legal Dominance, and Strategic Orientation as Predictors of Crisis Communicative Strategies’.(1), 29–4 1.
  43. Högskoleverket. (2001). Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
  44. Ihlen, O., and Verhoeven, P. (2012) ’A Public Relations Identity for the 2010s’.(2), 159–176.
  45. Jaffe, J. (2007). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  46. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Wong, V., and Saunders, J. (2008). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  47. L’Etang, J. (2002) ’Public Relations Education in Britain: A Review at the Outset of the Millennium and Toughts for a Different Research Agenda’.(1), 43–53.
  48. L’Etang, J. (2004). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  49. Larsson, L. (2005). Lund: Student-litteratur.
  50. Linderholm, I. (1997)Lund: Lund University.
  51. Mahoney, J. (2011) ’Horizons in Strategic Communication: Teorising a Paradigm Shift’.(3), 143–153.
  52. McKie, D. (2001) ’Updating Public Relations: “New Science”, Research Paradigms, and Uneven Developments, in Heath, R.L. (ed.),(pp. 75–91). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  53. Monten, R. (2012). Informationsindex 2011: informationsbranschens Tillväxt Och Utveckling under 2011 Stockholm: Sveriges Informationsförening och Precis.
  54. Moss, D., and DeSanto, B. (2011). London: Sage.
  55. Mumby, D.K. (1988). Noorwood, NJ: Ablex.
  56. Mumby, D. K. (2013). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  57. Palm, L. (1994). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  58. Pelsmacker, P. d., Geuens, M., and Bergh, J. v. d. (2010). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  59. Pitman, G.R. (1966) ’A Calculus of Military Stability’.(4), 349.
  60. Proctor, T., and Kitchen, P. (2002) ’Communication in Postmodern Integrated Marketing’.(3), 144–154.
  61. Putnam, L.L. (1983) ’The Interpretive Perspective: An Alternative to Functionalism, in Putnam, L. L. and Pacanowsky, M. E. (eds.),(pp. 31–54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  62. Putnam, L.L., and Nicotera, A. M. (2010) ’Communicative Constitution of Organization is a Question: Critical Issues for Addressing It’.(1), 158–165.
  63. Sha, B.-L. (2011) ’Accredited Vs. Non-Accredited: The Polarization of Practitioners in the Public Relations Profession’.(2), 121–128.
  64. Stenberg, J. (2012). Unpublished manuscript, Department of Strategic Communication, Lund University.
  65. Tobin, N. (2004) ’Can the Professionalisation of the Uk Public Relations Industry Make It More Trustworthy?’.(1), 56–64.
  66. Tompkins, P.K., and Wanca-Tibault, M. (2001) ’Organizational Communication: Prelude and Prospects, in Jablin, F.M. and Putnam, L.L. (eds.),(pp. xvii–xxxi). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  67. Varey, R.J. (2000) ’A Critical Review of Conceptions of Communication Evident in Contemporary Business and Management Literature’.(4), 328–340.
  68. Wehmeier, S., and Winkler, P. (2013) ’Expanding the Bridge, Minimizing the Gaps: Public Relations, Organizational Communication, and the Idea Tat Communication Constitutes Organization’.(2), 280–290.
  69. Weick, K.E. (1979)(2 ed.) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  70. Weick, K.E. (1995). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  71. Weick, K.E. (2009). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  72. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K. M., and Obstfeld, D. (2005) ‘Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking’.(4), 409–422.
  73. Wehmeier, S., and Winkler, P. (2013) ‘Expanding the Bridge, Minimizing the Gaps: Public Relations, Organizational Communication, and the Idea Tat Communication Constitutes Organization’.(2), 280–290.
  74. Windahl, S., and Signitzer, B. (1992). London: Sage.
  75. Windahl, S., and Signitzer, B. (2009)(2 ed.) London: Sage.
  76. Zerfaβ, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Angeles, M., and Tench, R. (2012)
  77. Åberg, L. (1990) ’Teoretical Model and Praxis of Total Communication’.(2), 13–16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 138
Published on: Dec 18, 2014
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 Jesper Falkheimer, Mats Heide, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.