References
- Alber, D. A., Yang, Z., Alyakin, A., Yang, E., Rai, S., Valliani, A. A., Zhang, J., Rosenbaum, G. R., Amend-Thomas, A. K., Kurland, D. B., Kremer, C. M., Eremiev, A., Negash, B., Wiggan, D. D., Nakatsuka, M. A., Sangwon, K. L., Neifert, S. N., Khan, H. A., Save, A. V., … Oermann, E. K. (2025). Medical large language models are vulnerable to data-poisoning attacks. Nature Medicine, 31(2), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03445-1
- Alyukov, M., Makhortykh, M., Voronovici, A., & Sydorova, M. (2025). LLMs grooming or data voids? LLM-powered chatbot references to Kremlin disinformation reflect information gaps, not manipulation. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 6(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-187
- Bender, E. M., Gebru T., McMillan-Major A., & Shmitchell S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
- Birhane, A., Steed, R., Ojewale, V., Vecchione, B., & Raji, I. D. (2024). AI auditing: The broken bus on the road to AI accountability. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.14462
- Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
- Dylan, H., & Grossfeld, E. (2025). Revisionist future: Russia’s assault on large language models, the distortion of collective memory, and the politics of eternity. Dialogues on Digital Society, 1(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251377941
- Edwards, B. (2025). The GPT-5 rollout has been a big mess. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/08/the-gpt-5-rollout-has-been-a-big-mess/
- Ekberg, K., Forchtner, B., Hultman, M., & Jylhä, K. M. (2022). Climate obstruction: How denial, delay and inaction are heating the planet (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181132
- Forbes. (2025). AI 50. Retrieved March 5, 2026, from https://www.forbes.com/lists/ai50/
- Ghosh, S., & Caliskan, A. (2023). ChatGPT perpetuates gender bias in machine translation and ignores non-gendered pronouns: Findings across Bengali and five other low-resource languages. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1, 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568813.3600120
- Goldstein, J., Sastry, G., Musser, M., DiResta, R., Gentzel, M., & Sedova, K. (2023). Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246
- Guey, W., Bougault, P., de Moura, V. D., Zhang, W., & Gomes, J. O. (2025). Mapping geopolitical bias in 11 large language models: A bilingual, dual-framing analysis of US-China tensions. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23688
- Harvey, L. (2026, March 13). Musk’s Grok blocked by Indonesia, Malaysia over sexualized images in world first. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/12/business/indonesia-malaysia-grok-elon-musk-intl-hnk
- Hoskins A. (2024). AI and memory. Memory, Mind & Media, 3, e18. https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2024.16
- Hoskins, A. (2025). The forgetting ecology: Losing the past through digital media and AI. In Q. Wang, & A. Hoskins (Eds.), The remaking of memory in the age of the internet and social media (pp. 32–48). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197661260.003.0003
- Hoskins, A. (2026). AI & collective memory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 67, 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102156
- Jacob, M. (2025). Experts warn ‘AI-written’ paper is latest spin on climate change denial. AFP Fact Check. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.39798G2
- Kaarkoski, M., Häkkinen, T., & Kilpeläinen, H. (2024). Suomen Nato-jäsenyyden legitimointi menneisyyttä koskevien käsitysten näkökulmasta [Legitimising Finland’s NATO membership from the perspective of conceptions of the past]. Kosmopolis, 54(3), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.70483/kp.145565
- Kuokkanen, R. (2024). The problem of culturalizing indigenous self-determination: Sámi cultural autonomy in Finland. The Polar Journal, 14(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2024.2342125
- Kuznetsova, E., Makhortykh, M., Vziatysheva, V., Stolze, M., Baghumyan, A., & Urman, A. (2025). In generative AI we trust: Can chatbots effectively verify political information? Journal of Computional Social Science, 8(15). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00338-8
- Lahti, J., & Kullaa, R. (2020). Kolonialismin monikasvoisuus ja sen ymmärtäminen Suomen kontekstissa [The multifaceted nature of colonialism and its understanding in the Finnish context]. Historiallinen Aikakauskirja, 118(4), 420–426.
- Lundqvist S. (2022). A convincing Finnish move: Implications for state identity of persuading Sweden to jointly bid for NATO membership. Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 26(4), 73–110. https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.4.2022.3
- Makhortykh, M., Sydorova, M., Baghumyan, A., Vziatysheva, V., & Kuznetsova, E. (2024). Stochastic lies: How LLM-powered chatbots deal with Russian disinformation about the war in Ukraine. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 5(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-154
- Maynez, J., Narayan, S., Bohnet, B., & McDonald, R. (2020). On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. In D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1906–1919). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173
- Menke, M. (2025). The political uses of the past in Nordic media discourses: An integrative systematic literature review. Nordicom Review, 46(s1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2025-0007
- Miskimmon, A., O’loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2014). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871264
- Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2025). Cognitive imperialism in artificial intelligence: Counteracting bias with indigenous epistemologies. AI & Society, 40, 3045–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02065-0_
- Ojanen, H., & Raunio, T. (2018). The varying degrees and meanings of Nordicness in Finnish foreign policy. Global Affairs, 4(4-5), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1533386
- OpenAI. (2025). Introducing GPT-5. https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5/
- Pacheco, A. G., Cavalini, A., & Comarela, G. (2025). Echoes of power: Investigating geopolitical bias in US and China large language models. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.16679
- Paprocka, M. W. (2025). Navigating ethical dilemmas: Unveiling greenwashing in the AI era. In J. Paliszkiewicz, J. Gołuchowski, M. Mądra-Sawicka, & K. Chen (Eds.), Building trust in the generative artificial intelligence era: Technology challenges and innovations (pp. 34–42). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003586944
- Paruch, Z. (2026, January 1). LLM optimization (LLMO): Get AI to talk about your brand [Blog post]. Semrush. https://www.semrush.com/blog/llm-optimization/
- Pelevina, N., Sihvonen, T., Rousi, R., Laapotti T., & Mikkola, H. (2025). Finlandised electobots and the distortion of collective political memory. Memory, Mind & Media, 4, e26. https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2025.10022
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8), 9.
- Roslyakov, M. (2025, July 25). LLM and AI chatbot statistics (2025) – Who is winning the AI race? Xamsor. https://xamsor.com/blog/llm-and-ai-chatbot-statistics-who-is-winning-the-ai-race/
- Rozado, D. (2024). The political preferences of LLMs. PloS one, 19(7), e0306621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306621
- Seele, P. & Gatti, L. (2017). Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1912
- Shojaee, P., Mirzadeh, I., Alizadeh, K., Horton, M., Bengio, S., & Farajtabar, M. (2025). The illusion of thinking: Understanding the strengths and limitations of reasoning models via the lens of problem complexity. Apple Machine Learning Research. https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/illusion-of-thinking
- Taylor, J. (2025, July 9). Musk’s AI firm forced to delete posts praising Hitler from Grok chatbot. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/09/grok-ai-praised-hitler-antisemitism-x-ntwnfb
- Ulloa, R., Zucker, E. M., Bultmann, D., Simon, D. J. & Mahortykh, M. (2025). From prosthetic memory to prosthetic denial: Auditing whether large language models are prone to mass atrocity denialism. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02719-7
- Urman, A., & Makhortykh, M. (2025). The silence of the LLMs: Crosslingual analysis of guardrail-related political bias and false information prevalence in ChatGPT, Google Bard (Gemini), and Bing Chat. Telematics and Informatics, 96, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102211
- Urman, A., Makhortykh, M., & Hannak, A. (2025). WEIRD audits? Research trends, linguistic and geographical disparities in the algorithm audits of online platforms - a systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732026
- Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 6000–6010.
- Waldman, S. (2025). Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot has started reciting climate denial talking points. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/elon-musks-ai-chatbot-grok-is-reciting-climate-denial-talking-points/