Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influencing through advocacy: Parents of children with disability giving and seeking support on Instagram Cover

Influencing through advocacy: Parents of children with disability giving and seeking support on Instagram

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191
  2. Arriagada, A., & Bishop, S. (2021). Between commerciality and authenticity: The imaginary of social media influencers in the platform economy. Communication, Culture & Critique, 14(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab050
  3. Banet-Weiser, S. (2021). Gender, social media, and the labor of authenticity. American Quarterly, 73(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2021.0008
  4. Beuckels, E., & De Wolf, R. (2025). Social media influencers as new agents on parenthood? A systematic literature review of parent influencer research and a future research agenda. Information Communication & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2334913
  5. Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2017). Sharenting: Parent blogging and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication, 15(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1223300
  6. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
  7. Damkjær, M. S. (2018). Sharenting = good parenting? Four parental approaches to sharenting on Facebook. In G. Mascheroni, C. Ponte, & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital parenting: The challenges for families in the digital age (pp. 209–218). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-5398
  8. Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2015). Disability and the media. Bloomsbury.
  9. Goggin, G., & Ellis, K. (2020). Privacy and digital data of children with disabilities: Scenes from social media sharenting. Media and Communication, 8(4), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3350
  10. Hendry, N. A., Hartung, C., & Welch, R. (2021). Health education, social media, and tensions of authenticity in the ‘influencer pedagogy’ of health influencer Ashy Bines. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2006691
  11. Hill, S. (2023). Locating disability within online body positivity discourses: An analysis of #DisabledAndCute. Feminist Media Studies, 23(4), 1311–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2032254
  12. Holiday, S., Densley, R. L., & Norman, M. S. (2020). Influencer marketing between mothers: The impact of disclosure and visual brand promotion. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 42(3), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2020.1782790
  13. Johansen, S. L. (2024). ‘I just want to show that I am living a normal life’: Young people with physical disabilities on social media. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Ungdomsforskning, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18261/ntu.5.2.4
  14. Jorge, A., Marôpo, L., Coelho, A. M., & Novello, L. (2022). Mummy influencers and professional sharenting. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211004593
  15. Kent, M. (2019). Social media and disability: It’s complicated. In K. Ellis, G. Goggin, B. Haller, & R. Curtis (Eds.), The Routledge companion to disability and media (1st ed.) (pp. 264–274). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716008
  16. Kjær, B. (2022). Voicing the silenced – One million voices and the Danish disability experience. Social Work & Society, 20(2). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-sws-2869
  17. Leaver, T. (2020). Balancing privacy: Sharenting, intimate surveillance and the right to be forgotten. In L. Green, D. Holloway, K. Stevenson, T. Leaver, & L. Haddon (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital media and children. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351004107
  18. Neag, A., Supa, M., & Mihailidis, P. (2024). Researching social media and activism with children and youth: A scoping review. International Journal of Communication, 18. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21717/4573
  19. Ouvrein, G. (2024). Mommy influencers: Helpful or harmful? The relationship between exposure to mommy influencers and perceived parental self-efficacy among mothers and primigravida. New Media & Society, 26(4), 2295–2314. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221086296
  20. Petersen, E. J. (2015). Mommy bloggers as rebels and community builders: A generic description. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement, 6(1). https://jarm.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jarm/article/view/40238
  21. Riedl, M. J., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. C. (2023). Political Influencers on social media: An introduction. Social Media + Society, 9(2).
  22. Ruiz-Gomez, A., Marôpo, L., & Jorge, A. (2024). Between advocacy and commodification on Instagram: A case study of sharenting a child with disabilities. Children & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12916
  23. Södergren, J., & Vallström, N. (2023). Disability in influencer marketing: A complex model of disability representation. Journal of Marketing Management, 39(11-12), 1012–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2144418
  24. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
  25. Trevisan, F., & Farinosi, M. (2024). Disabled influencers on Instagram: Exploring digital celebrity and marginalised identities. Celebrity Studies, 15(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2024.2341599
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 129
Published on: May 19, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2025 STINE LIV JOHANSEN, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.