Have a personal or library account? Click to login
When influencer logic and news media logic converge in the scandalisation of an influencer: The exposure of literary critic and influencer Katherine Diez’s plagiarism Cover

When influencer logic and news media logic converge in the scandalisation of an influencer: The exposure of literary critic and influencer Katherine Diez’s plagiarism

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Culturel Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103 https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
  2. Abidin, C., Hansen, K., Hogsnes, M., Newsland, G. Nielsen, M. L., Nielsen, L. Y., & Sihvonen, T. (2020). A review of formal and informal regulations in the Nordic influencer industry, Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 2(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2020-0007
  3. Abidin, C., & Ots, M. (2016). Influencers tell all? Unravelling authenticity and credibility in a brand scandal. In M. Edström, A. T. Kenyon, & E.-M. Svensson (Eds.), Blurring the lines: Market-driven and democracy-driven freedom of expression (pp. 153–165). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-4686
  4. Altheide, D. (2014). Media edge: Media logic and social reality. Peter Lang.
  5. Altheide, D., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Sage.
  6. Amiri, G. (2024, February 4). Geeti Amiri: Diez har snyltet på ligestillingskampen [Geeti Amiri: Diez has been a parasite on the fight for equality]. Berlingske. https://www.berlingske.dk/kommentatorer/geeti-amiri-kathrine-diez-har-snyltet-paa-ligestillingskampen
  7. Arriagada, A., & Bishop, S. (2021). Between commerciality and authenticity: The imaginary of social media influencers in the platform economy. Communication, Culture and Critique, 14(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab050
  8. Asp, K. (2014). News media logic in a new institutional perspective. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.889456
  9. Banet-Weiser, S. (2012). Authentic: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. NYU Press.
  10. Benoit, W. L. (2014). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory and research. State University of New York Press.
  11. Bergløv, E. (2024, January 23). De fældede Diez: Reddit er en rygtebørs, et sladderhjørne og en seriøs researchmuskel [They felled Diez: Reddit is a rumor mill, a gossip corner, and a serious research muscle]. Politiken. https://politiken.dk/kultur/medier/art9719632/Reddit-er-en-rygtebørs-et-sladderhjørne-og-en-seriøs-researchmuskel
  12. Bergløv, E., & Bech-Danielsen, A. (2024, January 17). Ekspert efter plagiatsag: Det er blevet lettere at finde dem, der pynter sig med lånte fjer [Expert after plagiarism case: It has become easier to find those who adorn themselves with borrowed feathers]. Politiken. https://politiken.dk/kultur/art9717632/Det-er-blevet-lettere-at-finde-dem-der-pynter-sig-med-lånte-fjer
  13. Bishop, S. (2023). Influencer creep: How artists strategically navigate the platformisation of art worlds. New Media & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231206090
  14. Blach-Ørsten, M., Hartley, J. M., & Wittchen, M. B. (2021). Fabrication and erroneous information: Exploring two types of news media scandals as critical incidents in journalism. Journalistica, 15(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v15i1.125395
  15. boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527
  16. Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088
  17. Chen, X. S., & Kanai, A. (2022). Authenticity, uniqueness and talent: Gay male beauty influencers in post-queer, postfeminist Instagram beauty culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549421988966
  18. Choi, G. Y., & Mitchell, A. M. (2022). So sorry, now please watch: Identifying image repair strategies, sincerity and forgiveness in YouTubers’ apology videos. Public Relations Review, 48(4), 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102226
  19. Dahlager, L. (2024, January 19). 2010’erne har ringet, Frederik, og du ved godt hvorfor [The 2010s have called, Frederik, and you know why]. Politiken. https://politiken.dk/ibyen/art9716327/2010erne-har-ringet-Frederik-og-du-ved-godt-hvorfor
  20. D’Angelo, P. (2020). Critical Incident as a construct in journalism studies. In E. Tandoc Jr., J. Jenkins, R. Thomas, & O. Westlund (Eds.), Critical incidents in journalism: Pivotal moments reshaping journalism around the world (pp. 15–27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019688
  21. Diez, K. [@katherine_diez]. (2024a). No title. [photo of text]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/C2PKXwps5iR/?hl=da&img_index=1
  22. Diez, K. [@katherine_diez]. (2024b). No title. [photo of text]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/C3Z9rvEN6_c/?hl=da&img_index=1
  23. Diez, K. (2024c). I egen barm [Grasping one’s own bosom]. People’s.
  24. Dreyer, P. (2024, February 10). De tjener penge på den perfekte virkelighed: Men man kan ikke lægge et filer på hykleri [They make money on perfect reality: But you can’t put a file on hypocrisy]. Berlingske.https://www.berlingske.dk/eksistens/de-tjener-penge-paa-den-perfekte-virkelighed-men-man-kan-ikke-laegge-et
  25. Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love. Yale University Press.
  26. Ekström, M., & Johansson, B. (2008). Talk scandals. Media, Culture & Society, 30(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084350
  27. Elmelund, R. (2024a, January 19). Katherine Diez’ “kulturelle kapital krakelerer” efter afsløringer om afskrift fra andre tekster [Katherine Diez’s “cultural capital is cracking” after revelations about plagiarism]. Information.https://www.information.dk/kultur/2024/01/katherine-diez-kulturelle-kapital-krakelerer-afsloeringer-afskrift-andres-tekster
  28. Elmelund, R. (2024b, January 26). Norsk forfatter efter plagiatsager: “Vi lever i kopismens tid” [Norwegian author after plagiarism cases: “We live in the age of copyism”]. Information.
  29. Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity: How media constructs reality. Peter Lang.
  30. From, R. (2024, February 1). Hvis man for alvor fryder sig over Katherine Diez nu, har man nok altid haft et horn i siden på hende [If you’re really excited about Katherine Diez now, you’ve probably always had a crush on her]. Berlingske. https://www.berlingske.dk/kommentatorer/hvis-man-for-alvor-fryder-sig-over-katherine-diez-nu-har-man-nok
  31. Giese, D. (2024, January 26). »De vil helst møde kl. 10 og gå igen kl. 14. Ikke fordi de skal hente børn, men fordi de skal til keramik og lave kimchi« [”They prefer to meet at 10 am and leave again at 2 pm. Not because they have to pick up children, but because they are going to pottery and make kimchi”]. Politiken. https://politiken.dk/debat/klummer/art9730334/»De-vil-helst-møde-kl.-10-og-gå-igen-kl.-14.-Ikke-fordi-de-skal-hente-børn-men-fordi-de-skal-til-keramik-og-lave-kimchi«
  32. Hartley, J. M., Wittchen, M. B., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2020). Peeling or plagiarizing? A Danish media scandal as an incident of re-instating boundaries in the grey zones of “good” journalistic citing practices. In E. Tandoc Jr., J. Jenkins, R. Thomas, & O. Westlund (Eds.), Critical incidents in journalism: Pivotal moments reshaping journalism around the world (pp. 45–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019688
  33. Hellensberg, L. A. (2024, January 23). Katherine Diez fjernes fra hjemmeide og mister samarbejde [Katherine Diez removed from home idea and loses cooperation]. B.T. https://www.bt.dk/danske-kendte/katherine-diez-fjernes-fra-hjemmeside-og-mister-samarbejde
  34. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181
  35. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  36. Kador, J. (2009). Effective apology: Mending fences, building bridges, and restoring trust. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  37. Karlsson, M. (2022). Transparency and journalism: A critical appraisal of a disruptive norm. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340642
  38. Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
  39. Kintu, B., & Ben-Slimane, K. (2020). Companies responses to scandal backlash caused by social media influencers. International Journal of Market Research, 62(6), 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320957577
  40. Kopping, K. D. (2024a, January 16). Katherine Diez i modvind: Beskyldes for plagiat [Katherine Diez in the crosshairs: Accused of plagiarism]. Ekstrabladet. https://ekstrabladet.dk/underholdning/dkkendte/katherine-diez-i-modvind-beskyldes-for-plagiat/10094737
  41. Kopping, K. D. (2024b, January 19). Katherine Diez’ møgsager: ‘Jeg går i seng med mit arbejde’ [Katherine Diez’s bullshit: “I go to bed with my work”]. Ekstrabladet. https://ekstrabladet.dk/underholdning/dkkendte/katherine-diez-moegsager-jeg-gaar-i-seng-med-mit-arbejde/10096376
  42. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2015). From ivory tower to cross-media personas: The heterogeneous cultural critic in the media. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/175 12786.2015.1051370
  43. Kühn, S. W. (2024a, Janary 23). Katherine Diez siger, at hun har en bacheloruddannelse – men det kan Københavns Universitet ikke bekræfte [Katherine Diez says she has a bachelor’s degree – but the University of Copenhagen cannot confirm this]. Berlingske. https://www.berlingske.dk/kultur/katherine-diez-siger-at-hun-har-en-bacheloruddannelse-men-det-kan
  44. Kühn, S. W. (2024b, February 16). Berlingskes plagiatundersøgele af Katherine Diez er nu afsluttet. Her er resultatet [Berlingske’s plagiarism investigation of Katherine Diez has now been completed. Here are the results]. Berlingske. https://www.berlingske.dk/kultur/berlingskes-plagiatundersoegelse-af-katherine-diez-er-nu-afsluttet-her-er
  45. Larsen, T. L. (2024, February 2). Mediet Reddit har afsløret Katherine Diez og givet kapitalfonde milliardtab – men hvad der det social medie for noget? [The media outlet Reddit has exposed Katherine Diez and caused billions in losses for private equity funds – but what does that social media do?]. Børsen.
  46. Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. John Wiley and Sons.
  47. Lull, J., & Hinerman, S. (1997). Media scandals: Morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. Polity Press.
  48. Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539
  49. Marshall, P. D. (2016). The celebrity persona pandemic. University of Minnesota Press.
  50. Mimoun, K. M. (2024, January 20). Katherine Diez – kan man kritisere det perfekte/uperfekte menneske? [Katherine Diez – can you criticise the perfect/imperfect person?]. POV. https://pov.international/katherine-diez-kritik-perfekte-uperfekt-menneske/
  51. Neuendorf, K. A. (2019). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In P. Brough (Ed.), Advance research for applied psychology: Design, analysis and reporting. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517971
  52. Olrik, J. (2024, February 4). Sexolog: Historien on Katherine Diez er historien om os. Vi lever i bedragets tidsalder [Sexologist: The story of Katherine Diez is the story of us. We live in the age of deception]. Berlingske.https://dd-berlingskedk-origin.berlingske.dk/kronikker/sexolog-historien-om-katherine-diez-er-historien-om-os-vi-lever-i
  53. Paludan, T. (2024, January 25). Forfatter: Hold øjnene på bolden og udelad Diez’ udseende fra debatten [Author: Keep your eyes on the ball and leave Diez’s appearance out of the debate]. Politiken.https://politiken.dk/debat/debatindlaeg/art9726718/Hold-øjnene-på-bolden-og-udelad-Diez-udseende-fra-debatten
  54. Pollack, E., Allern, S., Kantola, A., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2018). The new normal: Scandals as a standard feature of political life. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3087–3108. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7099/0
  55. Stockmann, C. (2024, January 20). Camilla Stockmann: Katherine Diez er ikke kun et råddent æble. De gamle mediehuse har et medansvar [Camilla Stockmann: Katherine Diez is not just a rotten apple. The old media houses have a shared responsibility]. Politiken.https://politiken.dk/kultur/art9723443/Katherine-Diez-er-ikke-kun-et-råddent-æble.-De-gamle-mediehuse-har-et-medansvar
  56. Thimm, C. (2018). Media technology and media logic(s): The media grammar approach. In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner-Pflock (Eds.), Media logic(s) revisited: Modelling the interplay between media institutions, media technology and societal change (pp. 111–132). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_6
  57. Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Polity Press.
  58. Tumber, H., & Waisbord, S. (2019). Media and scandal. In H. Tumber, & S. Waisbord (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (pp. 10–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351173001
  59. Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication,1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
  60. Van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2021). Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers.b Convergence,27(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136
  61. Villemoes, S. (2024a, January 17). Katherine Diez’ litterære genbrug er mere omfattende end først antaget [Katherine Diez’s literary recycling is more extensive than first thought]. Weekendavisen. https://www.weekendavisen.dk/2024-3/boeger/katherine-diez-litteraere-genbrug-er-mere-omfattende-end-foerst
  62. Villemoes, S. (2024b, January 18). Blev lånte fjer til fem høns? [Were feathers borrowed for five chickens?]. Weekendavisen. https://www.weekendavisen.dk/2024-3/boeger/blev-laante-fjer-til-fem-hoens
  63. Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
  64. Waysdorf, A. S. (2021). Remix in the age of ubiquitous remix. Convergence, 27(4), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856521994454
  65. Wellman, M. L., Stoldt, R., Tully, M., & Ekdale, B. (2020). Ethics of authenticity: Social media influencers and the production of sponsored content. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1736078.
  66. Zelizer, B. (2004). When facts, truth, and reality are god-terms: On journalism’s uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000180953
  67. Zulli, D. (2021). Socio-mediated scandals: Theorizing political scandals in a digital media environment. Communication Theory, 31(4), 862-883. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa014
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 111
Published on: May 19, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2025 NETE NØRGAARD KRISTENSEN, ANNE JERSLEV, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.