Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Ambivalent rituals of belonging: (Re)theorising hybrid, violent media events

Open Access
|May 2022

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
  2. Airoldi, M. (2018). Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622
  3. Allan, S. (2014). Witnessing in crisis: Photo-reportage of terror attacks in Boston and London. Media, War & Conflict, 7(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635214531110
  4. Aral, S. (2020). The hype machine: How social media disrupts our elections, our economy, and our health—and how we must adapt. Penguin Random House.
  5. Caliandro, A. (2018). Digital methods for ethnography: Analytical concepts for ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(5), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617702960
  6. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
  7. Citton, Y. (2017). The ecology of attention. Polity Press.
  8. Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized rituals: Beyond manufacturing consent. Media, Culture & Society, 28(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163443706062910
  9. Cottle, S. (2014). Rethinking media and disasters in a global age: What’s changed and why it matters. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213513229
  10. Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986608
  11. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). Mediated construction of reality. Wiley.
  12. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2018). The continuing lure of the mediated centre in times of deep mediatization: Media Events and its enduring legacy. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726009
  13. Couldry, N., Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (Eds.). (2010). Media events in a global age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872604
  14. Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business School Press.
  15. Dayan, D. (2010). Beyond media events: Disenchantment, derailment, disruption. In N. Couldry, A. Hepp & F. Krotz (Eds.), Media events in a global age (pp. 23–31). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872604
  16. Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press.
  17. Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Duke University Press.
  18. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Bloomsbury.
  19. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury.
  20. Eskjær, M., Hjarvard, S., & Mortensen, M. (Eds.). (2015). The dynamics of mediatized conflicts. Peter Lang.
  21. Evans, M. (2018). Media events in contexts of transition: Sites of hope, disruption and protest. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726012
  22. Facebook Newsroom [@fbnewsroom]. (2019, March 17). In the first 24 hours we removed 1.5 million videos of the attack globally, of which over 1.2 million were [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/fbnewsroom/status/1107117981358682112
  23. Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press.
  24. Fox, A. (Ed.). (2018). Global perspectives on media events in contemporary society. IGI Global.
  25. Frosh, P., & Pinchevski, A. (2018). Media and events after Media Events. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726007
  26. Goldfarb, J. (2018). Media events, solidarity, and the rise and fall of the public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726010
  27. Halse, C. (2018). Theories and theorising of belonging. In C. Halse (Ed.), Interrogating belonging for young people in schools (pp. 1–28). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75217-4_1
  28. Harju, A., & Huhtamäki, J. (2021). “#hellobrother needs to trend”: Methodological reflections on the digital and emotional afterlife of mediated violence. International Review of Sociology, 31(2), 310–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1947951
  29. Hassan, R. (2009). Empires of speed: Time and acceleration of politics and society. Brill.
  30. Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (2007). “No more peace!”: How disaster, terror and war have upstaged media events. International Journal of Communication, 1, 157–166.
  31. Katz, E., & Dayan, D. (2018). L’esprit de l’escalier: 25 years of hindsight. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726015
  32. Knuutila, A. (2019. May 7). Närkästyksen kone: Miksi uusoikeiston ääni kuuluu verkossa muita vahvemmin? [The outrage machine: Why is the voice of the new right louder than others in the internet?] Politiikasta.fi [Net magazine]. https://politiikasta.fi/narkastyksen-kone-miksi-uusoikeiston-aani-kuuluu-verkossa-muita-vahvemmin/
  33. Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press.
  34. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
  35. Liebes, T. (1998). Television’s disaster marathons: A danger for democratic processes? In T. Liebes, & J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 71–84). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203019122
  36. Lindgren, S. (2020). Data theory: Interpretive sociology and computational methods. Polity.
  37. Macklin, G. (2019). The Christchurch attacks: Livestream terror in the viral video age. CTC Sentinel, 12(6), 18–29. https://ctc.usma.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CTC-SENTINEL-062019.pdf
  38. Manhire, T. (2019, April 4). “Humanity. That’s all”: Jacinda Ardern on the response to the 2019 Christchurch attacks. The Spinoff. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/08-04-2019/humanity-thats-all-jacinda-ardern-on-the-response-to-the-christchurch-attacks/
  39. Morse, T. (2018). The mourning news: Reporting violent death in a global age. Peter Lang.
  40. Mortensen, M. (2015). Conflictual media events, eyewitness images, and the Boston marathon bombing. Journalism Practice, 9(4), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1030140
  41. Mortensen, M. (2021, December 23). Perpetrator witnessing: Testing the norms and forms of witnessing through livestreaming terror attacks. Journalism. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211060631
  42. Munn, L. (2019, March 3). Algorithmic hate: Brenton Tarrant and the dark social web. Institute of Network Cultures. https://networkcultures.org/blog/2019/03/19/luke-munn-algorithmic-hate-brenton-tarrant-and-the-dark-social-web/
  43. Nossek, H. (2008). “News media”–media events: Terrorist acts as media events. Communications, 33(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.020
  44. Perez, M. (2019, March 15). PewDiePie “sickened” by reference from suspected Christchurch gunman. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattperez/2019/03/15/pewdiepie-sickened-by-reference-from-suspected-christchurch-gunman/?sh=385e33a26f66
  45. Phillips, W., & Milner, R. M. (2017). The ambivalent internet: Mischief, oddity, and antagonism online. Polity.
  46. Porter, J. (2019, March 15). Facebook says the Christchurch attack live stream was viewed by fewer than 200 people. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/19/18272342/facebook-christchurch-terrorist-attack-views-report-takedown
  47. Rantasila, A. (2020). Circulating emotions, sticky feelings: Affective dynamics of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in a hybrid media environment [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Finland]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-1764-5
  48. Rathnayake, C. (2021). Uptake, polymorphism, and the construction of networked events on Twitter. Telematics & Informatics, 57, Article 10158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101518
  49. Rojek, C. (2013). Event power: How global events manage and manipulate. Sage.
  50. Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00309
  51. Sonnevend, J. (2016a). More hope! Ceremonial media events are still powerful in the twenty-first century. In A. Fox (Ed.), Global perspectives on media events in contemporary society (pp. 132–138). IGI Global.
  52. Sonnevend, J. (2016b). Stories without borders: The Berlin wall and the making of a global iconic event. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190604301.001.0001
  53. Sreberny, A. (2016). The 2015 Charlie Hebdo killings, media event chains, and global political responses. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3485–3502.
  54. Sumiala, J. (2013). Media and ritual: Death, community and everyday life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094877
  55. Sumiala, J. (2021). Mediated death. Polity.
  56. Sumiala, J., & Tikka, M. (2020). Digital media ethnographers on the move – An unexpected proposal. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.37
  57. Sumiala, J., Valaskivi, K., Tikka, M., & Huhtamäki, J. (2018). Hybrid media events: The Charlie Hebdo attacks and the global circulation of terrorist violence. Emerald.
  58. The Wall Street Journal. (2021, October 1). The Facebook files: A Wall Street Journal investigation. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039?page=3
  59. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
  60. Uusitalo, N., & Valaskivi, K. (2020). The attention apparatus: Conditions and affordances of news reporting in hybrid media events of terrorist violence. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1854052
  61. Uusitalo, N., Valaskivi, K., & Sumiala., J. (2021, May 16). Epistemic modes in news production: How journalists manage ways of knowing in hybrid media events involving terrorist violence. Journalism. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211015601
  62. Vainikka, E. (2020). Prekarisaation tunnemaisema: Vastustavat taktiikat, tunnelmat ja elämänpolitiikka verkon julkisuudessa [Emotional landscape of precarization: Opposing strategies, ambiences, and life politics in online publicity] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Finland]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-1637-2
  63. Valaskivi, K., Rantasila, A., Tanaka, M., & Kunelius, R. (2019). Traces of Fukushima: Global events, networked media and circulating emotions. Palgrave Macmillan.
  64. Valaskivi, K., & Sumiala, J. (2022) “You will never hear me mention his name”: The (im)possibility of the politics of recognition in disruptive hybrid media events. International Journal of Communication. (In press)
  65. van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
  66. Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2017). What is an event? University of Chicago Press.
  67. Wahlquist, C. (2019, March 19). Ardern says she will never speak name of Christchurch suspect. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/19/new-zealand-shooting-ardern-says-she-will-never-speak-suspects-name
  68. Webster, J. G. (2014). The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in a digital age. MIT Press.
  69. YouTubeInsider [@YouTubeInsider]. (2019, March 18). Wanted to give an update on our actions since Friday’s horrific tragedy. We’ve removed tens of thousands of videos and [Tweet]. Twitter. https://mobile.twitter.com/youtubeinsider/status/1107645353673871360?lang=bg
  70. Yval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Sage.
  71. Zelenkauskaite, A., Toivanen, P., Huhtamäki, J., & Valaskivi, K. (2021). Shades of hatred online: 4chan memetic duplicate circulation surge during hybrid media events. First Monday, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i1.11075
Language: English
Page range: 81 - 98
Published on: May 7, 2022
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2022 Katja Valaskivi, Johanna Sumiala, Minttu Tikka, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.