Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The climate change movement and political parties: Mechanisms of social media and interaction during the 2019 electoral period in Finland Cover

The climate change movement and political parties: Mechanisms of social media and interaction during the 2019 electoral period in Finland

Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. Barry, E., & Lemola, J. (2019, April 12). The right's new rallying cry in Finland: ‘Climate Hysteria’. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/12/world/europe/finland-populism-immigration-climate-change.html
  2. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  3. Blee, K., & Currier, A. (2006). How local social movement groups handle a presidential election. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9025-x
  4. Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., & McCurdy, P. (2013). Mediation and protest movements. Intellect.
  5. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–266.
  6. Chadwick, A. (2017). Systemic hybridity in the mediation of the American presidential campaign. In A. Chadwick, The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.003.0008
  7. Chen, T. H. Y., Salloum, A., Gronow, A., Ylä-Anttila, T., & Kivelä, M. (2020). Polarization of climate politics results from partisan sorting: Evidence from Finnish Twittersphere. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.02706.
  8. Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336
  9. Della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (1986). Unwanted children: Political violence and the cycle of protest in Italy, 1966–1973. European Journal of Political Research, 14(5–6), 607–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1986.tb00852.x
  10. Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks: Virtual and real. Information, Communication and Society, 3(3), 386–401.
  11. Earl, J. (2019). Technology and social media. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 289–305). John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Eduskunta [Parliament of Finland]. (2019). Kansanedustajat. Entiset kansanedustajat. Tilastotietoa entisistä kansanedustajista. Eduskuntaryhmien voimasuhteet vaalikauden 2015–2018 päättyessä [Parliament members. Statistics on former parliament members. Power relations of parliamentary groups at the end of the 2015–2018 parliamentary term]. https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/kansanedustajat/entiset_kansanedustajat/tilastotietoa-entisista-edustajista/Sivut/default.aspx.
  13. Eduskunta [Parliament of Finland]. (2020). Kansanedustajat. Tilastotietoa kansanedustajista, Eduskuntaryhmien voimasuhteet [Parliament members. Statistics on parliament members. Power relations of parliamentary groups]. https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/kansanedustajat/tilastot/Sivut/hex8110_Eduskuntaryhmien%20voimasuhteet.aspx.
  14. Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
  15. Goldstone, J. A. (2003). Introduction: Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. In J. A. Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties, and social movements (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.
  16. Howard, P. N., Duffy, A., Freelon, D., Hussain, M. M., Mari, W., & Maziad, M. (2011). Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595096
  17. Kavada, A. (2013). Internet cultures and protest movements: The cultural links between strategy, organizing and online communication. In B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Mediation and protest movements (pp. 75–94). Intellect.
  18. Kavada, A. (2020). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. In A. Karatzogianni, M. Schandorf, & I. Ferra (Eds.), Protest technologies and media revolutions (Digital activism and society: Politics, economy and culture in network communication) (pp. 107–125). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-646-720201009
  19. Kavada, A., & Poell, T. (2020). From counterpublics to contentious publicness: Tracing the temporal, spatial, and material articulations of popular protest through social Media. Communication Theory, 31(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa025
  20. Kekkonen, A., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2021) Affective blocs: Understanding affective polarization in multiparty systems [Unpublished manuscript].
  21. Koivula, A., Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2019). The role of political activity in the formation of online identity bubbles. Policy and Internet, 11(4), 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.211
  22. Korvaamaton. (2019a). Ovatko puolueet tosissaan 1,5 asteen kanssa? Yhteenveto nykyisten eduskuntapuolueiden ilmastolinjauksista [Are parties serious about 1.5 degrees? A summary of the climate policies of current parliamentary parties]. https://www.korvaamaton.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Ovatko-puolueet-tosissaan-15-asteen-kanssa-yhteenveto-nykyisten-eduskuntapuolueiden-ilmastolinjauksista.pdf
  23. Korvaamaton. (2019b). Mistä kampanjassa on kyse? [What's the campaign about?]. Retrieved June 15, 2020, from https://www.korvaamaton.fi/
  24. Kriesi, H. (2015). Party systems, electoral systems, and social movements. In D. Della Porta, & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 667–680). Oxford University Press.
  25. Larsson, A. O. (2017). Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515577891
  26. Marttila, M. (2018). #vainkansanedustajajutut – Kansanedustajien Twitter-käyttö ja sitä selvittävät tekijät [#justparliamentmemberthings – Twitter use of parliament members and explanatory factors]. In P. Isotalus, J. Jussila, J. Matikainen, & M. Boedeker (Eds.), Twitter viestintänä: ilmiöt ja verkostot [Twitter as communication: Phenomena and networks] (pp. 62–85). Vastapaino.
  27. Mattoni, A. (2008). Serpica Naro and the others: The media sociali experience in Italian struggles against precarity. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5130/portal.v5i2.706
  28. Mattoni, A., & Ceccobelli, D. (2018). Comparing hybrid media systems in the digital age: A theoretical framework for analysis. European Journal of Communication, 33(5), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118784831
  29. McAdam, D., & Boudet, H. (2012). Putting social movements in their place: Explaining opposition to energy projects in the United States, 2000–2005. Cambridge University Press.
  30. McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 529–542. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25698616
  31. McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2013). Social movements and elections: Toward a broader understanding of the political context of contention. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms and processes (pp. 325–346). University of Minnesota Press.
  32. McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2019). The political context of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 19–42). John Wiley & Sons.
  33. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). The dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
  34. McCurdy, P. M. (2008). Inside the media event: Examining the media practices of Dissent! at the Hori-Zone eco-village at the 2005 G8 Gleneagles Summit. Communications, 33(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.019
  35. Ministry of Justice Finland. (2019). Europarlamenttivaalit 2019, tulokset, valitut [European Parliament elections 2019, results, elected]. https://tulospalvelu.vaalit.fi/EPV-2019/fi/kokomaaval.html
  36. Ministry of Justice Finland. (2014). Europarlamenttivaalit 2014, tulokset, valitut [European Parliament elections 2014, results, elected]. https://tulospalvelu.vaalit.fi/EPV2014/fi/kokomaaval.html
  37. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. Penguin UK.
  38. Morris, D. (2003). Globalization and media democracy: The case of indymedia. In D. Schuler, & P. Day (Eds.), Shaping the network society: The new role of civil society in cyberspace (pp. 325–352). MIT Press.
  39. Orpo, P. [@petteriorpo]. (2019, September 27). Minusta lasten ja nuorten motiiveja ei ole syytä epäillä. Ylivoimaisesti suurin syy osallistua #ilmastolakko’on… [I don’t think there is a reason for suspicion over the motives of children and youth. By far, the biggest reason to participate in #climatestrike …]. [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/PetteriOrpo/status/1177548264708685824
  40. Pickard, V. W. (2006). Assessing the radical democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, technical, and institutional constructions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(01), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180600570691
  41. Ruoho, I., & Kuusipalo, J. (2018). Läsnäolon valtaa: Politiikan ja median eliittiverkostot Twitterissä [The power of presence: The elite networks of politics and media in Twitter]. In P. Isotalus, J. Jussila, & J. Matikainen (Eds.), Twitter viestintänä: Ilmiöt ja verkostot [Twitter as communication: phenomena and networks] (pp. 51–66). Vastapaino.
  42. Savolainen, S., Ylä-Anttila, T., Luhtakallio, E., & Jokela, M. (2020). Finland. In J. De Moor, K. Uba, M. Wahlström, M. Wennerhag, & M. De Vydt (Eds.), Protest for a future II: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays For Future climate protests on 20–27 September, 2019, in 19 cities around the world. Open Society Foundation. https://osf.io/3hcxs/
  43. Sirén, I., Kuokkanen, K., & Malmberg, L. (2019). “Että ne kehtaa!” huusi tuhatpäinen joukko – Ilmastolakko valtasi Eduskuntatalon edustan ja sulki Mannerheimintien [“How dare you!” shouted a group of thousand protestors – The climate strike occupied the front of the parliament house and closed Mannerheimintie]. Helsingin Sanomat. https://www.hs.fi/kaupunki/art-2000006252356.html
  44. Thompson, E. P. (1968). The making of the English working class. Penguin Books.
  45. Tilly, C. (1964). The vendee. Harvard University Press.
  46. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Addison-Wesley.
  47. Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. G. (2016). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  48. Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.830969
  49. Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
  50. Vesa, J., Gronow, A., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2020). The quiet opposition: How the pro-economy lobby influences climate policy. Global Environmental Change, 63, 102117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102117
  51. Ylä-Anttila, T. (2005). The world social forum and the globalization of social movements and public spheres. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 5(2), 423–442.
  52. Zald, M. N., & Berger, M. A. (1978). Social movements in organizations: Coup d’etat, insurgency, and mass movements. American Journal of Sociology, 83(4), 823–861.
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 60
Published on: Jul 6, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Sonja Savolainen, Tuomas Ylä-Anttila, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.