Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Even in Sweden?1: Misinformation and elections in the new media landscape

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Andersson, U., & Weibull, L. (2018). Polariserat medieförtroende [Polarised trust in media]. In U. Andersson, A. Carlander, E. Lindgren, & M. Oskarson (Eds.), Sprickor i fasaden [Cracks in the façade] (pp. 71–92). Gothenburg: SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://som.gu.se/digitalAssets/1693/1693442_sprickor-i-fasaden.pdf
  2. Codes of Ethics from Around the World (CEAW). (n.d.). Sweden: Code of ethics for the press, radio and television. Retrieved March 27, 2020, from http://www.columbia.edu/itc/journalism/j6075/edit/codes.html
  3. Colliver, C., Pomerantsev, P., Applebaum, A., & Birdwell, J. (2018). Smearing Sweden: International influence campaigns in the 2018 Swedish election. LSE Institute of Global Affairs. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/smearing-sweden-international-influence-campaigns-in-the-2018-swedish-election/
  4. Eck, K., & Fariss, C. (2017, February 24). No, Sweden isn’t hiding an immigrant crime problem: This is the real story. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/02/24/no-sweden-isnt-hiding-an-immigrant-crime-problem-this-is-the-real-story/?utm_term=.47e54915e75e
  5. Fernqvist, J., Kaati, L., & Schroeder, R. (2018, November 8–10). Political bots and the Swedish general election 2018. [Conference presentation]. IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), Miami, Florida, USA. http://isi18.azurewebsites.net/Program/Papers
  6. Finnemann, N. O. (2011). Mediatization theory and digital media. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 36(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2011.004
  7. Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
  8. Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
  9. Hedman, F., Sivnert, F., Kollanyi, B., Narayanan, V., Neudert, L.-M., & Howard, P. N. (2018, September 6). News and political information consumption in Sweden: Mapping the 2018 Swedish general election on Twitter [Data Memo for The Computational Propaganda Project]. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/sweden-election/
  10. Herkman, J. (2018). Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica, 61(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317737816
  11. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181
  12. Holt, K. (2016). “Alternativmedier”? En intervjustudie om mediekritik och mediemisstro [“Alternative media”? An interview study on media criticism and media mistrust]. In Andersson Schwarz, J., Bjereld, U., Bolin, N., Chukri, R., Dahlberg, A., Djalaie, R., . . . Truedson, L. (Eds.), Migrationen i medierna: Men det får en väl inte prata om? [Migration in the media: But you shouldn’t talk about that?] (pp. 113–149). Stockholm: Institute for media studies. https://mediestudier.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Migrationen-i-medierna.pdf
  13. Jack, C. (2017, August 9). Lexicon of lies: Terms for problematic information [Report]. Data & Society. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://datasociety.net/library/lexicon-of-lies/
  14. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., . . . Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
  15. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018) Reuters Institute digital news report 2018. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism/University of Oxford. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2018/
  16. Oscarsson, H., & Stroembaeck, J. (2019). Political communication and the 2018 Swedish election campaign. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 121(3), 319–345. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1333531/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  17. Pred, A. (2000). Even in Sweden: Racisms, racialized spaces, and the popular geographical imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. Radio Sweden. (2017, August 23). Study: Newspapers mostly negative on migration. Retrieved March 27, 2020, from https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&artikel=6761896
  19. Rydgren, J., & van der Meiden, S. (2019). The radical right and the end of Swedish exceptionalism. European Political Science, 18, 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0159-6
  20. Sandberg, L. A., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Start sharing the news: Exploring the link between rightwing alternative media and social media during the Swedish 2018 election. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 121(3), 421–440. Retrieved March 20, 220, from https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/19816/17898
  21. Sannerstedt, A. (2017). Sverigedemokraterna: Skånegapet krymper [The Sweden Democrats: The Skåne gap is shrinking]. In U. Andersson, J. Ohlsson, H. Ekengren Oscarsson, & M. Oskarson (Eds). Larmar och gör sig till [Alarming and taking action] (pp. 451–471). Gothenburg: SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://som.gu.se/digitalAssets/1655/1655881_larmar-och-g--r-sig-till.pdf
  22. Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the Internet: Media, technology and globalization. London: UCL Press. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://www.uclpress.co.uk/products/95132
  23. Schroeder, R. (2019). Digital media and the entrenchment of right-wing populist agendas. Social Media + Society, (October–December), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119885328
  24. Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2018). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research, 1–23. Advance online publication. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0093650217749354
  25. The Local. (2018, September 8). Sweden Democrats to boycott public broadcaster following debate controversy. Retrieved March 27, 2020, from https://www.thelocal.se/20180908/sweden-democrats-to-boycott-public-broadcaster-following-debate-controversy
  26. Vetenskap & Allmänhet. (2019, June 5). Nyhetsvärderaren valspecial – ungdomar granskar politiska nyheter [News assessment election special – youths audit political news]. Retrieved March 27, 2020, from https://v-a.se/2019/06/varapport2019-4/
  27. Webster, J. (2014). The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in a digital age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  28. Woolley, S., & Howard, P. (Eds.) 2018. Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:www.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 108
Published on: Jun 7, 2020
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2020 Ralph Schroeder, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.