Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Public Interest and the Social Contract: A Dialectical Approach to the Epistemological Foundations of Public Administration Cover

Public Interest and the Social Contract: A Dialectical Approach to the Epistemological Foundations of Public Administration

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Adaba, K. A., & Boio, D. (2024). Across Africa, public trust in key institutions and leaders is weakening. Afrobarometer Dispatch 891. https://www.afrobarometer.org/publication/ad891-across-africa-public-trust-in-key-institutions-and-leaders-is-weakening/
  2. Andion, C. (2023). Epistemological reflections and doing science in contemporary administration. Revista De Administração Contemporânea, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2023230017.en
  3. Aulia, A. P., & Andhini. (2025). The dilemma of decentralization in public policy implementation in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration Review, 2(4), 13. https://doi.org/10.47134/par.v2i4.4757
  4. Bouckaert, G. (2012). Reforming for Performance and Trust: Some reflections. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 5(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-012-0001-4
  5. Bozeman, B. (2019). Public values: Citizens’ perspective. Public Management Review, 21(6), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1529878
  6. Brenton, S., & Stein, J. (2024). The legitimacy of local government in the Australian federation. Politics & Policy, 52(2), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12582
  7. Bruner, J. P. (2020). Locke, Nozick and the state of nature. Philosophical Studies, 177(3), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1201-9
  8. Brusa, G., Caliusco, M. L., & Chiotti, O. (2006). Building Ontology in Public Administration: A Case Study 2 Budgetary and Financial System: Domain Description. In SEBIZ'06 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Applications and Business Aspects of the Semantic Web (226th ed.). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-226/paper02.pdf
  9. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Barberg, B. (2023). Public value governance and strategic public management. In Handbook on Strategic Public Management (pp. 92-113). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907193.00015
  10. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238
  11. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (Eds.). (2015). Creating Public Value in Practice: Advancing the Common Good in a Multi-Sector, Shared-Power, No-One-Wholly-in-Charge World (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18116
  12. Cluley, V., & Radnor, Z. (2019). Progressing the conceptualization of value co-creation in public service organizations. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(3), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz024
  13. Cronholm, S., Gbbel, H., & Cao, L. (2023). Abductive Design Science Research: The Interplay Between Deduction and Induction. In Australasian Conference on Information Systems (12th ed.). https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2023/12/
  14. Dadashpoor, H., & Sheydayi, A. (2021). Defining Public Interest in Planning: A review. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(4), 543-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211018379
  15. Dahlbeck, J., & Lilja, P. (2024). Rousseau’s lawgiver as teacher of peoples: Investigating the educational preconditions of the social contract. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2363357
  16. Douglas, H., & Branch, T. Y. (2024). The social contract for science and the value-free ideal. Synthese, 203(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04477-9
  17. Drechsler, W. (2009). The rise and demise of the New Public Management: Lessons and opportunities for South East Europe. Central European Public Administration Review, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v7i3.131
  18. Dubnick, M. J. (2018). Demons, Spirits, and Elephants: Reflections on the failure of Public Administration theory. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 4(1), 59-115. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.4.1.59-115
  19. Dyzenhaus, D. (2021). Thomas Hobbes and the Rule by Law Tradition. In J. Meierhenrich & M. Loughlin (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Ride of Law (pp. 261-277). Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.015
  20. Elías, M. V. (2023). Opening the “black box” of public administration: The need for interpretive research. Public Administration, 102(3), 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12959
  21. Ezbidi, B. (2024). ‘To persuade without convincing’: Rousseau’s doctrine of soft power? Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2306752
  22. Ferrari, M. (2020). Reflexive governance for infrastructure resilience and sustainability. Sustainability, 12(23), 10224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310224
  23. Grossi, G., Steccolini, I., Adhikari, P., Brown, J., Christensen, JVL, Cordery, C., Ferry, L., Lassou, P., McDonald, B., III, Raudla, R., Sicilia, M., & Vinnari, E. (2022). The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 20(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-09-2022-0135
  24. Hargrave, T. J., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2016). Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640843
  25. Hartley, J., Alford, J., Knies, E., & Douglas, S. (2016). Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review, 19(5), 670-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192166
  26. Hartley, J., Fuglsang, L., Rønning, R., & Geuijen, K. (2024). Debate: Whether and how public innovations create value. Public Money & Management, 44(6), 443-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2348292
  27. Hartley, K. (2023). New public management. In Elgar Encyclopedia in Urban and Regional Planning and Design (pp. 256-258).
  28. Hartley, K., Kuecker, G., & Woo, J. J. (2019). Practicing public policy in an age of disruption. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1622276
  29. Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. Springer Nature Link, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0
  30. Hobbes, T. (n.d.). Leviathan. Retrieved from Project Gutenberg. Retrieved https://ia801907.us.archive.org/13/items/thematterformean00hobbuoft/thematterformean00hobbuoft.pdf
  31. Holcombe, R. G., & Robson, G. J. (2025). Are social contracts possible without actual negotiation? Constitutional Political Economy, 36(1), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0602-024-09452-1
  32. Holm, A. B. (2024). Rousseau’s second discourse and social contract: challenging the received view, journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 48(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.12974
  33. Kaganovska, T. E., Pakhomova, I. A., Neviadovskyi, V. O., & Yefremov, A. O. (2022). Public interest as a category of administrative and legal science. Ius Humani Law Journal, 11(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.vllil.292
  34. Khuroshvili, B. B. (2023). Evolution of the thoughts of public administration and its understanding following the perspectives of political science, management and law. Institutiones Administrations, 3(2), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v3i2.66
  35. Kovač, P. (2019). The rule of law in CEE public administration through the content analysis of selected articles. In NISPAcee Conference, https://www.nispa.org/files/conferences/2019/e-proceedings/system_files/papers/rule-of-law-kovac.pdf
  36. Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
  37. Liu, Y., & Van Den Dool, A. (2022). Legitimizing Postcrisis Policy change: Crisis- Framing Strategies by Public Leaders in China. Natural Hazards Review, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000570
  38. Loewe, M., El-Haddad, A., Furness, M., Houdret, A., & Zintl, T. (2024). Drivers of change in social contracts: Building a conceptual framework. Mediterranean Politics, 30(5), 919-945. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2024.2379733
  39. Loewe, M., & Zintl, T. (2021). State Fragility, Social Contracts and the Role of Social Protection: Perspectives from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region. Social Sciences, 10(12), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120447
  40. Loewe, M., Zintl, T., & Houdret, A. (2021). The social contract as a tool of analysis: Introduction to the special issue on “Framing the evolution of new social contracts in Middle Eastern and North African countries.” World Development, 145,104982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104982
  41. Lucke, J. (1972). Two treatises of government, ambridge University Press. (Reprinted the 7th time by J. Whiston). https://archive.org/details/twotreatisesofgo00lockuoft/page/4/mode/2up?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  42. Machakaire, D., & Mokhele, M. (2024). A Literature Review on the Paradoxes of Public Interest in Spatial Planning within Urban Settings with Diverse Stakeholders. Sustainability, 16(9), 3608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093608
  43. Marini F. (1971). Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. Chandler Publishing. https://archive.org/details/towardnewpublicaOOmari
  44. Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding Policy networks: towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00247
  45. Martyniuk-Pşczek, J., & Pşczek, G. (2026). Reflective practice as a basis for building a sustainable public space: The case of Kartuzy. URBAN DESIGN International, 31(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-024-00246-3
  46. McMahon, C. (2025). Rousseau’s General Will and the Will of All: A Present-Day Perspective. The Journal of Ethics, 29(3), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-025-09517-9
  47. Minna, K., Jacobi, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Lukkarinen, J. P., Ott, A., Peltomaa, J., Schneider, F., Tribaldos, T., & Zaehringer, J. G. (2024). Reflexive use of methods: A framework for navigating different types of knowledge and power in transformative research. Sustainability Science, 19(2), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl1625-023-01431-z
  48. Moloney, K., & Lewis, R. (2023). The Flawed Foundations of Social Equity in Public Administration: A Racial contract Theory critique. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(4), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvad009
  49. Moore, M. H. (2014). Public Value Accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12198
  50. Nani, Y. N., Abdussamad, Z., Elyta, E., & Tohopi, R. (2023). NPA, The New Paradigm of Public Service Overview of Public Policy Implementation. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research (pp. 148-154). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-174-6_25
  51. Nastar, M. (2023). A critical realist approach to reflexivity in sustainability research. Sustainability, 15(3), 2685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032685
  52. Nemec, J. (2010). New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What Do we Know and where Do we Go? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-010-0002-0
  53. Nemec, J., Špaček, D., & K. (2023). Regulating Access to Information of Public Interest during an Emergency. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Vol. XVI, No. 1 (Musim Panas 2023), Him. 49-68., XVI(l).
  54. Ochrana, F. (2022). Historical-evolutionary and retrograde approach to the study of social phenomena and public administration. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 15(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0011
  55. Ochrana, F., & Pavel, J. (2013). Analysis of the Impact of Transparency, Corruption, Openness in Competition and Tender Procedures on Public Procurement in the Czech Republic. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7,114-134.
  56. Ongaro, E. (2017). Philosophy and Public Administration: An Introduction. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718442
  57. Ongaro, E. (2024). Integrating the neo-Weberian state and public value. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(4), 830-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241228830
  58. Ongaro, E., & Sancino, A. (2023). International public administration and management: Towards the third phase? Public Policy and Administration, 38(4), 377-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198995
  59. Ongaro, E., & Yang, Y. (2024). Integrating philosophical perspectives into the study of public administration: The contribution of Critical Realism to understanding public value. Public Policy and Administration, 40(3), 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241246654
  60. Oppi, C., Campanale, C., & Cinquini, L. (2022). Ambiguity in public sector performance measurement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, 34(3), 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-09-2020-0167
  61. Parra, J. D. (2023). Realist evaluation and its role in the stages of explanatory research based on critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 22(5), 859-881. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2023.2251816
  62. Poljaševic, B. Z., Gričnik, A. M., & Žižek, S. Š. (2025). Human resource management in public administration: The ongoing tension between reform requirements and resistance to change. Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030094
  63. Prebble, M. (2021). Public value is unknowable; public authority makes every government decision a wicked problem. Administration & Society, 53(10), 1582— 1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211022685
  64. Radu, B. V. (2023). A Policy Perspective on Regulating Disinformation in Romania during the Covid-19 Pandemic. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(1), 108-137. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0005
  65. Ragolane, M. (2025). Hybrid governance and public value in South African PPPs: Balancing trust, accountability and participation. The International journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities, 2(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i3.264
  66. Räsänen, A., Sarkki, S., Haanpää, O., Isolahti, M., Kekkonen, H., Kikuchi, K., Koukkari, V., Kärkkäinen, K., Miettinen, J., Mäntymaa, E., Nieminen, M., Rahkila, R., Ruohonen, A., Sarkkola, S., Välimäki, M., Yliperttula, K., & Heikkinen, H. I. (2024). Bridging the knowledge-action gap: A framework for co-producing actionable knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy, 162, 103929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103929
  67. Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2022). Public Administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198116
  68. Rousseau, J. J., & De Geneve, C. (1782). Du Contrat Social, ou Principes du Droit Politique (The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right). 1, 187-360. www.rousseauonline.ch
  69. Rowe, K. M., Whitty, S. & Van Der Hoorn, B. (2024). Creating authority and autonomy: Necessary dialectical tensions in public sector project management. Project Leadership and Society, 5, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100119
  70. Rowe, K. M., Whitty, S. & Wheeldon, A. L. (2024). The Pragmatic Comportment Compass: Rethinking projectification in public sector projects. Project Leadership and Society, 5, 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100152
  71. Sandberg, B. (2020). The Artist as Innovation Muse: Findings from a Residence Program in the Fuzzy Front End. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040088
  72. Schmeisser, B. (2013). A Systematic review of literature on offshoring of value chain activities, journal of International Management, 19(4), 390-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.011
  73. Short, J. L. (2023). In Search of the Public Interest. Yale Journal on Regulation, 40(2), 759-836. https://www.yalejreg.com/print/in-search-of-the-public-interest/
  74. Silva, P. A., & Santos, A. C. B. D. (2022). Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: From Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices. Organizaţâes & Sociedade, 29(101), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-92302022v29n0012en
  75. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  76. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2022). The Three Orders of Public Innovation: Implications for Research and Practice. Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public Sector, 1(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.18261/njips.1.1.3
  77. Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2021). Competing Ontologies: A Redux primer for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(6), 422-435. https://doi.org/l0.1177/02750740211005047
  78. Thabit, S., Sancino, A., & Mora, L. (2024). Strategic public value(s) governance: A systematic literature review and framework for analysis. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 885-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13877
  79. Thompson, J. (2022). A guide to Abductive Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340
  80. Tonnarelli, F., & Mora, L. (2024). Smart urbanism in Africa: When theories do not fit with contextual practices. Regional Studies, 58(9), 1767-1777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2235407
  81. Tsagkroni, V., & Dikaios, G. (2024). Editorial: Policy framing and Branding in Times of Constant Crisis. Media and Communication, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8384
  82. Upmeier Zu Belzen, A., Engelschalt, P., & Kruger, D. (2021). Modeling as Scientific Reasoning, The role of abductive reasoning for modeling competence. Education Sciences, 11(9), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/educscil1090495
  83. Van Der Steen, B., Van Saane, J., & Van Dijk, G. (2023). Public leaders in accelerated times: A qualitative study on their reflective practices in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Leadership, 19(4), 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-05-2023-0041
  84. Van Leeuwen, J., Van Tatenhove, J., Schutter, M., & Voyer, M. (2024). Theorizing reflexivity and transformative change in marine governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 27(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2024.2337706
  85. Waldo, D., & Miller, H. T. (1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of american public administration. In The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration (pp. 1-227). The Ronald Press Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315130859
  86. Ward, L. (2017). Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on a liberal right of secession. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 876-888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917717818
  87. Wei, J. (2024). Reflective learning: A new leadership development framework driving engineering innovation. Reflective Practice, 25(3), 352-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2320141
  88. Weigh L., Roth, T., Amard, A., & Zavolokina, L. (2024). When public values and user- centricity in e-government collide - A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101956
  89. Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277
  90. Zhang, X., Kleinhans, R., & Qu, L. (2025). Understanding the dialectical relationship between governance and governance outcomes in the context of urban (re)development: A critical review. Cities, 165, 106129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106129
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2026-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309 | Journal ISSN: 1337-9038
Language: English
Page range: 163 - 191
Published on: Jun 16, 2026
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Yakob Noho Nani, Zuchri Abdussamad, Juriko Abdussamad, Rustam Tohopi, Muchtar Achmad, Alfiah Agussalim, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.