Transaction Costs in Contracting out a Public Service – Case of Municipal Waste in Slovakia

Murínová, Kristína; Meričková, Beáta Mikušová

doi:10.2478/nispa-2025-0015

Abstract

To contract out public services or deliver them internally? Transaction costs, as part of the total costs for a public service, should represent an important factor when choosing how a public service should be delivered. Despite this, previous domestic and foreign literature shows that oftentimes, the service provider is unable or unwilling to calculate these costs, even if it might result in finding the most effective service delivery option. The goal of this paper is to analyse the situation in Slovak municipalities regarding transaction costs associated with public procurement and producer monitoring for the service of municipal waste management. The primary data from 254 Slovak municipalities, obtained through an online questionnaire, reveal a certain level of ignorance regarding transaction costs, as most municipalities were unable to provide the necessary data required to calculate the transaction costs associated with the selected service.

References

Bel, G., & Rosell, J. (2016). Public and Private Production in a Mixed Delivery System: Regulation, Competition, and Costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21906
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bel, G., & Sebő, M. (2021). Does Inter-Municipal Cooperation Really Reduce Delivery Costs? An Empirical Evaluation of the Role of Scale Economies, Transaction Costs, and Governance Arrangements. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1), 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419839492
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bel, G., & Warner, M. E. (2015). Inter-municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence. Public Administration, 93(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12104
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Warner, M. E. (2010). Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public Production? A Meta-regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 553-577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20509
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benito, B., Guillamón, M. D., & Bastida, F. (2015). Public Versus Private in Municipal Services Management. LexLocalis, 13, 995-1018. https://doi.org/10.4335/13.3.995-1018(2015)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brannman, L., Klein, J. D., & Weiss, L. W. (1987). The Price Effects of Increased Competition in Auction Markets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937897
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, T. L. (2008). The Dynamics of Government-to-Government Contracts. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(3), 364-386. https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576310303
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2002). The Influence of Transaction Costs on Municipal Government Choices about Alternative Modes of Service Provision. (Working Paper). Indiana University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug030
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 326-351.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. (2015). Managing Complex Contracts: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bruno, E. E. (2019). Principal-Agent Relation and Contracting-out for Employment Case Management to Enable Third-Country Nationals’ Transition to Work. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clifton, J., Warner, M. E., Gradus, R., & Bel, G. (2019). Re-municipalization of Public Services: Trend or Hype? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1691344
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cuypers, I. R., Hennart, J. F., Silverman, B. S., & Ertug, G. (2021). Transaction Cost Theory: Past Progress, Current Challenges, and Suggestions for the Future. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 111-150. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0051
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. (2013). Cost Advantage Cooperations Larger than Private Waste Collectors. Applied Economics Letters, 20(7), 702-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.732682
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S. A., & Thompson, D. J. (1986). Competitive Tendering and Efficiency: The Case of Refuse Collection. Fiscal Studies, 7(4), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1986.tb00530.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, Buy, or Ally: A Transaction Cost Theory Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794670
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Greaver, M. F. (1999). Strategic Outsourcing: A Structured Approach to Outsourcing Decisions and Initiatives. AMACOM.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grega, M., Orviska, M., Nemec, J., & Lawson, C. (2019). Factors Determining the Efficiency of Slovak Public Procurement. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gupta, S. (2002). Competition and Collusion in a Government Procurement Auction Market. Atlantic Economic Journal, 30(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299143
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hefetz, A., Warner, M. E., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2014). Professional Management and Local Government Service Delivery: Strategic Decisions across Alternative Markets. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(2), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.983829
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hirsch, W. Z. (1991). Privatizing Government Services: An Economic Analysis of Contracting by Local Governments. Institute of Industrial Relations Publications Center, University of California.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holíková, J., Mikušová Meričková, B., & Jakuš Muthová, N. (2022). Vertical fiscal imbalance in delegated responsibilities performing at the local self-government level in Slovakia. Journal of Economics and Social Research, 23(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24040/eas.2022.23.2T23-140
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keane, C., Marx, J., & Ricci, E. (2001). Privatization and the scope of public health: A national survey of local health department directors. American Journal of Public Health, 91(4), 611–617.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levin, J., & Tadelis, S. (2010). Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from U.S. cities. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(3), 507–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meričková, B. M., Soukopová, J., Šumpíková, M., & Kŕápek, M. (2022). Municipal Solid Waste Management in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 15(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nemec, J., Meričková, B. M., & Vozárová, Z. (2012). Management of Contracting Public Services and its Quality in Slovakia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 5(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-012-0003-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nemec, J., Šumpíková, M., Orviská, M., Bušina, F., & Grega, M. (2016). Transaction costs in the public procurement: Selected findings in Czech and Slovak conditions. In P. Loster & T. Pavelka (Eds.), The 10 th International Days of Statistics and Economics: Conference proceedings (pp. 1749–1758). Prague: University of Economics.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ohlsson, H. (2003). Ownership and Production Costs: Choosing Between Public Production and Contracting-out in the Case of Swedish Refuse Collection. Fiscal Studies, 24(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00091.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pavel, J., & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2009). Testing the validity of the Brown-Potoski model in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Prague Economic Papers, 18(4), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.357
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pavel, J., & Vítek, L. (2016). Transaction costs of the Czech public procurement. Paper presented at the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) Conference, Hong Kong, 13-15 April 2016
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perunović, Z., & Pedersen, J. L. (2007). Outsourcing process and theories. In Proceedings of the POMS 18th Annual Conference, 4-7 May, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petersen, O. H., Hjelmar, U., & Vrangbæk, K. (2018). Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? Systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000 to 2014. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 130-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12297v
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plaček, M., Schmidt, M., Ochrana, F., & Půček, M. (2019). Factors affecting the length of procedure in public procurement: The case of the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 28(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.692
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pratt, J. W., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (Eds.). (1985). Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quinn, J. J. (2011). Principal-agent theory. 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rho, E. (2013). Contracting revisited: Determinants and consequences of contracting out for public education services. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 327-337.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schoute, M., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2018). Municipalities’ choices of service delivery modes: The influence of service, political, governance, and financial characteristics. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 502–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1297337
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sičáková-Beblavá E., Beblavý M. (2007). Faktory ovplyvňujúce rozhodovanie o spôsobe zabezpečovania služieb vo velkých slovenských mestách. Politická ekonómie, 2, 245-262.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simões, P., Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2012). The performance of private partners in the waste sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 29-30, 292-302.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soukopová, J., & Klimovský, D. (2016). Local Governments and Local Waste Management in the Czech Republic: Producers or Providers? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(2), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soukopová, J., & Sládeček, T. (2018). Intermunicipal Cooperation in Municipal Waste Management and Its Effects on Cost-Effectiveness. Waste Forum, 2018(1), 17-25. https://is.muni.cz/publication/1406810/cs/Intermunicipal-Cooperation-in-Municipal-Waste-Management-and-Its-Effects-on-Cost-Effectiveness/Soukopova-Sladecek
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soukopová, J., Mikušová-Meričková, B., Nemec, J., & Šumpíková, M. (2022). Institutional Factors Determining Costs of Municipal Waste Management in the Czech Republic. Waste Management, 144, 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.04.026
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soukopová, J., Vaceková, G., & Klimovský, D. (2017). Local Waste Management in the Czech Republic: Limits and Merits of Public-Private Partnership and Contracting out. Utilities Policy, 48, 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.09.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Šumpíková, M., & Ďurčeková, I. (2019). Transaction Costs, Outsourcing, and the Public Procurement Review Process in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szymanski, S. (1996). The impact of compulsory competitive tendering on refuse collection services. Fiscal Studies, 17(3), 1–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2012). Insourcing and outsourcing: The dynamics of privatization among U.S. municipalities 2002-2007. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(3), 313–327.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1086/466942
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Transaction Costs in Contracting out a Public Service – Case of Municipal Waste in Slovakia

Abstract

Paradigm

My account