Understanding the Social Status of Civil Servants in Kazakhstan: An Analysis of Determinants and Public Perception

Bokayev, Baurzhan; Torebekova, Zulfiya; Tynyshbayeva, Ane; Nauryzbek, Kamila; Zharov, Yerzhan

doi:10.2478/nispa-2025-0013

Abstract

This study analyzes the social status of civil servants by examining survey data from 10,942 civil servants and conducting 22 expert interviews. The research aims to define the social status of civil servants and analyze the factors influencing this status in Kazakhstan. The findings reveal that, according to international practices, several key factors impact the social status of civil servants. These include economic conditions, public perception and the professional competencies of civil servants. Socioeconomic conditions of civil servants significantly influence how civil servants are perceived and valued in society. Additionally, the behavior of civil servants in public settings and their professional skills play a critical role in shaping their social status. Effective management of these factors can enhance the perception of civil servants and contribute to their social status. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights for improving the status and public perception of civil servants in Kazakhstan and beyond.

References

Adilet.kz (2022). The concept of development of the civil service of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 29, 2022 No. 1114.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (1999). How can you do it? Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 413-434.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bertram, C., & Meijer, A. (2024). Getting what you expect: How civil servant stereotypes affect citizen satisfaction and perceived performance. Public Administration, 102(4), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12986.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bertram, L, Bouwman, R., & Tummers, L. (2022). Socioeconomic Status and Public Sector Worker Stereotypes: Results from a Representative Survey. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13461.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bokayev, B. N., Zharov, E. K., Aitkozhina, A. K., & Baktiyarova, G. N. (2024). Attracting Young People to the Civil Service: Analysis of the Problems and Necessary Measures. Bulletin of Turan University, 2,110-123. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2024-1-2-110-123
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bokayev, B., & Amirova, A. (2023). Reforming the Civil Service System in Kazakhstan: Three Innovative Solutions and Priorities. The Innovation Journal, 28(2), 1–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bokayev, B., Amirova, A., & Kosherbayeva, A. (2023). Building Innovative Capacity of Public Servants: The Case of Kazakhstan. The Innovation Journal, 28(2), 1–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bokayev, B., Davletbayeva, Z., Sadykova, K., Balmanova, A., & Baktiyarova, G. (2024). Assessing Communication Competencies of Public Servants in Kazakhstan: Current Status and Approaches for Enhancement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.52
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bokayev, B., Nauryzbek, M., Davletbayeva, Z., Dussipov, Y., Rysbekova, Z., & Torebekova, Z. (2022). Factors Driving Individual Perceptions of Quotidian Corruption: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Public Integrity, 25(4), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2054569
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braams, D., & van der Voet, J. (2024). Civil servant tactics for realizing transition tasks: Understanding the microdynamics of transformative government. Public Administration, 102(3), 567–584.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brodkin, E. Z., & Majmundar, M. (2010). Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup046
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2005). The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh081
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Lokshin, M., & Kolchin, V. (2023). Effects of public sector wages on corruption: Wage inequality matters. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(3), 941–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.04.003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fiori, G., Piergallini, A., & Shadaydeh, R. (2023). Public-private wage differentials and interactions across countries and time (IMF Working Paper No. 2023/064). International Monetary Fund.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hattke, F., Hensel, D., & Kalucza, J. (2019). Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13116
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Issenova, G., Bokayev, B., Nauryzbek, M., Torebekova, Z., Kosherbayeva, A., & Amirova, A. (2024). An Examination of Civil Servants’ Assessment of the New Civil Service Reforms in Kazakhstan. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 18(2), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2024-0006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manstead, A. S. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oliveira, G., & Dunn, C. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? A systematic review of 30 years of empirical research. Public Administration, 102(4), 889–910.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Civil Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Poocharoen, O., & Brillantes, A. (2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: A comparative study. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(4), 339–366.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Porumbescu, G. A. (2017). Does transparency improve citizens’ perceptions of government performance? Evidence from an experiment. Administration & Society, 49(3), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593314
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prendergast, C., & Stole, L. (2023). Rewarding bureaucrats: Can incentives improve public sector performance? International Growth Centre (ICC).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steijn, A. J., & Knies, E. (2019). Bureaucratic structures and organizational commitment: Findings from a comparative study of 20 European countries. Public Management Review, 22(4), 554–576.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van der Meer, F. M., Steen, T. P. S., & Wille, A. (2018). Civil service and public employment. In E. Ongaro & S. van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 205–228). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Understanding the Social Status of Civil Servants in Kazakhstan: An Analysis of Determinants and Public Perception

Abstract

Paradigm

My account