Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hierarchical Clustering of the European Countries from the Perspective of E-government, E-participation, and Human Development Cover

Hierarchical Clustering of the European Countries from the Perspective of E-government, E-participation, and Human Development

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z. J., Ishola, A. A., & Akindele, I. T. (2022). Does e-government impact e-participation? The influence of trust in e-government. International Review of Public Administration, 27(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071540
  2. Alderete, M.V. (2022). Can small cities from developing countries be smart cities? The case of Argentina. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 17(4), November, 36-51.
  3. Al-Mannaei, M., Al-Jayyousi, O., Mahmood, A., Dornberger, U., & Al-Jayousi, N. (2023). Evaluating innovation performance for financial technology within the national innovation system: A case study of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110210
  4. Anarfo, E. B., Abor, J. Y., Osei, K. A., & Gyeke-Dako, A. (2019). Financial inclusion and financial sector development in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel VAR approach. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15 (4), 444-463. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-07-2018-0205
  5. Androniceanu, A. (2023). The new trends of digital transformation and artificial intelligence in public administration. Administraţie si Management Public, 40,147-155. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.40-09
  6. Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2021). E-Government in European Countries, A comparative approach using the principal components analysis. Nispacee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015
  7. Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2023). Public administration digitalization and government effectiveness in EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 21(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2023.L01
  8. Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2022a). Public administration digitalization and corruption in the EU member states. A comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 65 E, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.65E.l
  9. Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, L, & Sabie, O. M. (2022b). The impact of digitalization on Public Administration, Economic Development, and Well-Being in the EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 20(2), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2022.2.01
  10. Baltagi, B. H. (2014). Panel Data Econometrics (1st edition). Routledge.
  11. Barro, R. J. (2001). Human Capital and Growth. American Economic Review, 91 (2). 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.12
  12. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943
  13. Bartczak, K. (2022). Changes in business models implied by the use of digital technology platforms. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(4), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.4(14)
  14. Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Samoliuk, N. (2023). Digital Skills of Civil Servants: Assessing Readiness for Successful Interaction in e-society. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 20(3), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.20.3.2023.3.10
  15. Bouckaert, G. & Van de Walle S. (2001, September 5-8). Government Performance and Trust in Government. Paper for the permanent study group of productivity and quality in the public sector. EGPA Annual Conference, Vaasa, Finland
  16. Burger, A., Cichiwskyj, C., Schmeißer, S., & Schiele, G. (2020). The Elastic Internet of Things - A platform for self-integrating and self-adaptive IoT-systems with support for embedded adaptive hardware. Future Generation Computer Systems, 113, 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.07.035
  17. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
  18. Colesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding trust in e-Government. The Engineering Economics, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.63.4.11637
  19. Colesca, S. E., & Dobrica, L. (2008). Adoption and use of E-Government services: The case of Romania. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 6(3), 204 - 217. https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.16656423.6.03.526
  20. Datta, S. K., & Singh, K. (2019). Variation and determinants of financial inclusion and their association with human development: A cross-country analysis. limb Management Review, 31(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.013
  21. Dhaoui, I. (2021). E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2070-2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0
  22. Dobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0003
  23. Dobrolyubova, E., Klochkova, E., & Alexandrov, O. (2019). Digitalization and Effective Government: What Is the Cause and What Is the Effect? In D. A. Alexandrov, A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova & I. Musabirov (Eds.), Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 1038, pp. 55-67). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_5
  24. Doran, N. M., Puiu, S., Bădîrcea, R. M., Pirtea, M., Doran, M. D., Ciobanu, G., & Mihit, L. D. (2023). E-Government Development—A key factor in government administration effectiveness in the European Union. Electronics, 12(3), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030641
  25. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.
  26. Durkiewicz, J., & Janowski, T. (2018). Is digitalization improving governance quality? Correlating analog and digital benchmarks. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Digital Government ECDG 2018, pp. 48-56. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
  27. Eynon, R. (2007). Breaking barriers to e-government: Overcoming obstacles to improving European public services (Modinis study Contract no. 29172). European Commission.
  28. Farris, J. S. (1969). On the Cophenetic Correlation Coefficient. Systematic Zoology, 18(3), 279. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412324
  29. Ferraz, D., Mariano, E. B., Rebelatto, D. a. D. N., & Hartmann, D. (2020). Linking Human Development and the Financial Responsibility of Regions: Combined Index Proposals Using Methods from Data Envelopment Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 150(2), 439-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll205-020-02338-3
  30. Gancarczyk, M., Łasak, P., & Gancarczyk, J. (2022). The fmtech transformation of banking: Governance dynamics and socio-economic outcomes in spatial contexts. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2022.100309
  31. Gatautis, R. (2008). The impact of ICT on public and private sectors in Lithuania. The Engineering Economics, 59(4), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.59.4.11558
  32. Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2021). The Digital Effectiveness on Economic Inequality: A Computational Approach. In A. M. Dima & F. D’Ascenzo (Eds.), Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 223-239). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59972-0_16
  33. Georgescu, I., Androniceanu, A. M., & Drăgulănescu, I. V. (2023). A Deep Learning Approach to Digitalization and Economic Growth. In M. Busu (Ed) Digital Economy and the Green Revolution. ICBE 2022. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 79-92). Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19886-1_6
  34. Głodowska, A., Maciejewski, M., & Wach, K. (2023). Navigating the digital landscape: A conceptual framework for understanding digital entrepreneurship and business transformation. International Entrepreneurship Review, 9(3), 7-18
  35. Gulati, G. J., Williams, C. B., & Yates, D. J. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005
  36. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
  37. Idzi, F. M., & Gomes, R. C. (2022). Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w
  38. Jurczuk, A., & Florea, A. (2022). Future-Oriented Digital Skills for Process Design and Automation. Human Technology, 18(2), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.3
  39. Kassambara, R. (2017). Practical Guide to Cluster Analysis in R (1st ed.). STHDA.
  40. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  41. Kemeç, A. (2022). Analysis of smart global research trends with network map technique. Management Research and Practice, 14(2), 46-59.
  42. Kersan-Škabić, L, & Vukašina, M. (2023). Contribution of ESIFs to the digital society development in the EU. Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-2/13
  43. Kézai, P. K., & Páthy, A. (2023). Sister city network’s development in Central-Eastern European regional centres. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 18(3), 5-26.
  44. Krishnan, S., Teo, T., & Lim., V. (2013). Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: a cross-country analysis. Information & Management, 50(8):638-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.003
  45. Kubičková, L., Kormanakova, M., Veselá, L., & Jelinkova, Z. (2021). The implementation of industry 4.0 elements as a tool stimulating the competitiveness of engineering enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.01.05
  46. Lăzăroiu, G., Androniceanu, A., Grecu, I., Grecu, G., & Negurita, O. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1047-1080. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.030
  47. Lee, T., Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, B. (2021). A validation of the modified democratic e-governance website evaluation model. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101616
  48. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, EL, & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
  49. Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317703691
  50. Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A. (2009). eParticipation: The Research Gaps. In A. Macintosh, & E. Tambouris (Eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5694 (pp. 1-11). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_l
  51. Małkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16 (2), 325-355. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
  52. Marino, A., & Pariso, P. (2021). Digital government platforms: issues and actions in Europe during pandemic time. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(1), 462-485. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.1(29)
  53. Marino, A., Pariso, P., & Picariello, M. (2022). Transition towards the artificial intelligence via re-engineering of digital platforms: comparing European Member States. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 350-368. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(21)
  54. Martins, J., & Veiga, L. G., (2022). Digital government as a business facilitator. Information Economics and Policy, 60, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100990
  55. Matei, A., & Dogaru, T. C. (2010). The administrative convergence in the Balkan area - Empirical analysis of social policy in Romania and Bulgaria. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 17(3 (544)), 5-24.
  56. Medaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010
  57. Mellouli, M., Bouaziz, F., & Bentahar, O. (2020). E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. International Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517
  58. Mesa, D. (2023). Digital divide, e-government and trust in public service: The key role of education. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1140416
  59. Meyer, D. F., & Meyer, N. (2020). The relationships between entrepreneurial factors and economic growth and development: The case of selected European countries. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.19
  60. Mishchuk, H., Bilan, Y., Androniceanu, A., & Krol, V. (2023). Social capital: Evaluating its roles in competitiveness and ensuring human development. Journal of Competitiveness, 15(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2023.02.01
  61. Morvai, J., Ormos, M., Antalik, I., Mura, L., Páldi, A., & Szabo, B. (2022). Financial planning in Slovakia: results of empirical research. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 10 (2), 572-589. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.10.2(36)
  62. Nowak, P. (2021). Cooperation of enterprises in innovative activities on the example of Polish regions. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(4), 839-857. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.031
  63. Ntshangase, B.A., & Msosa, S.K. (2022). Enhancing service delivery for metropolitan municipalities in South Africa via project management. Insights into Regional Development, 4(3), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2022.4.3(8)
  64. Okunola, J. L., & Fakunle, S. O. (2021). Community participation: a pragmatic solution to negative impacts of Covid-19 on household’s socioeconomic lives. Insights into Regional Development, 3(4), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2021.3.4(2)
  65. Oláh, J., Hidayat, Y. A., Gavurova, B., Khan, M. A., & Popp, J. (2021). Trust levels within categories of information and communication technology companies. PLOS ONE, 16 (6), e0252773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252773
  66. Phimolsathien, T. (2022). Guidelines for promoting understanding of blockchain’s influence on business operations in service sector. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.25.L20
  67. Pirannejad, A., Janssen, M., & Rezaei, J. (2019). Towards a balanced E-Participation Index: Integrating government and society perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101404
  68. Pollitt, C. (2001). Convergence: the useful myth? Public Administration, 79(4), 933-947. https://doi.org/10T111/1467-9299.00287
  69. Potter, J., (1988). Consumerism and the public sector: how well does the coat fit? Public Administration, 66(2), 149 - 164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jT467-9299.1988.tb00687.x
  70. Pucheanu, F., Colesca, S.E., Pacesila, M., & Burcea, S.G. (2022). Industry 4.0. Sustainability and Innovation at the Crossroad: A Review Analysis. Management Research and Practice, 14(3), 47-69.
  71. Ringold, D., Holla, A., Koziol, M., & Srinivasan, S. (2011). Citizens and Service Delivery: Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in Human Development Sectors. In The World Bank eBooks. World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8980-5
  72. Rodríguez-Martínez, C. C., Cubilla-Montilla, M., Vicente-Galindo, P., & Galindo-Villardón, P. (2023). X-STATIS: A Multivariate Approach to Characterize the Evolution of E-Participation, from a Global Perspective. Mathematics, 11(6), 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/mathl1061492
  73. Romesburg, H. C. (2004). Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Lulu Press.
  74. Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2021). Multi-dimensional analysis of regional investment attractiveness in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 103-138. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.004
  75. Sá, F., Rocha, Á., & Cota, M. P. (2016). Potential dimensions for a local e-Government services quality model. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.005
  76. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
  77. Sanford, C., & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002
  78. Santiso, C. (2022). Trust with integrity: Harnessing the integrity dividends of digital government for reducing corruption in developing countries. In UN Digital Library (DESA working paper 176). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3956989?ln=en
  79. Sen, A. (1997). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Harvard University Press.
  80. Shava, E., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2023). Inclusive participation in information and communication technologies (ICTs) processes for smart services in the city of Johannesburg. Insights into Regional Development, 5(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2023.5.1(2)
  81. Shishmanov, K. (2022). Digital Transformation in Romania and Bulgaria. In I. Panagoreţ & G. Gorghiu (Eds.), Lumen Proceedings: Vol. 18. Globalization, Innovation and Development, Trends and Prospects (GIDTP 2019). LUMEN Publishing House, https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gidtp2022/20
  82. Simionescu, M., Szeles, M. R., Gavurova, B., & Mentei, U. (2021). The Impact of Quality of Governance, Renewable Energy and Foreign Direct Investment on Sustainable Development in CEE Countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.765927
  83. Smith, S., Macintosh, A., & Millard, J. (2011). A three-layered framework for evaluating e-participation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(4), 304. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2011.046013
  84. Straková, J., Talíř, M., & Váchal, J. (2022). Opportunities and threats of digital transformation of business models in SMEs. Economics & Sociology, 15(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-3/9
  85. Sun, C., Lin, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022a). Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1081-1116. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.031
  86. Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vozňáková, I. (2022b). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 783-829. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.023
  87. Suzuki, R., & Shimodaira, H. (2015). pvclust: Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling, cran.r-project. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pvclust/index.html
  88. Szmrecsanyi, B. (2012). Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects: A Study in Corpus-Based Dialectometry. Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763380
  89. Škare, M., Gavurova, B., & Rigelsky, M. (2023). Innovation activity and the outcomes of B2C, B2B, and B2G E-Commerce in EU countries. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113874
  90. Tomkova, J. (2009). E-consultations: New tools for civic engagement or facades for political correctness. European Journal of ePractice, 7.
  91. United Nations. (2014). E-Government for the Future We Want, E-Government Survey 2014. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/un-e-government-survey-2014
  92. United Nations. (2018a). Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies, E-Government Survey 2018. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/un-e-government-survey-2018
  93. United Nations. (2018b). Working together: Integration, institutions and the Sustainable Development Goals, World Public Sector Report 2018. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-public-sector-report-2018
  94. United Nations. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals 16: Focus on Public Institutions, World Public Sector Report 2019. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-public-sector-report-2019
  95. Waheduzzaman, W., & Khandaker, S. (2022). E-participation for combating corruption, increasing voice and accountability, and developing government effectiveness: A cross-country data analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(4), 549-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12544
  96. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
  97. Wauters, P., & Lörincz, B. (2008). User satisfaction and administrative simplification within the perspective of e-government impact: Two faces of the same coin? European Journal of ePractice, 4, 1-10.
  98. Welch, E. (2012). The Rise of Participative Technologies in Government. In Transformational Government through EGov Practice: Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Technological Issues (pp. 347-367). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  99. Zambrano-Yepez, C., Guillén-Rodríguez, Y., & Henriquez-Coronel, P. (2023). Multivariate analysis of the determinants of e-government. Administraţie Şi Management Public, 40, 132-146. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.40-08
  100. Zautashvili, D. (2017). E-government Maturity Model by Growth Level of E-services Delivery. Journal of Technical Science & Technologies, 6 (2), 17-22.
  101. Zhang, Y., & Kimathi, F. A. (2022). Exploring the stages of e-government development from public value perspective. Technology in Society, 69, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101942
  102. Zsigmond, T., & Mura, L. (2023). Emotional intelligence and knowledge sharing as key factors in business management – evidence from Slovak SMEs. Economics and Sociology, 16(2), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-2/15
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 29
Published on: Dec 16, 2023
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Armenia Androniceanu, Irina Georgescu, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.