The Covid-19 Pandemic as a Driver of More Responsive Social Procedures: between Theory and Practices in Slovenia
By:
References
- Agere, S. (2000). Promoting Good Goνernance. Common Wealth Secretariat. http://dx.doi.org/10.14217/9781848597129-en
- Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, I. (2021). The COVID‐19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Reνiew, 23(7), 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
- Aristovnik, A., Kovač, P., Murko, E., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., Bohatá, M., Hirsch, B., Schäfer, F., & Tomaževič, N. (2021). The Use of ICT by Local General Administrative Authorities during COVID‐19 for a Sustainable Future: Comparing Five European Countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11765. https://doi.org/10.3390/sul32111765
- Auby, J.- B. (ed.). (2014). Codification of administratiνe procedures. Emile Bruylant.
- Avbelj, M. (ed.). (2019). Komentar Ustaνe Republike Sloνenije [Commentary to the Constitution of Republic of Sloνenia]. New University, Nova Gorica, European Law Faculty.
- Babšek, M., &Kovač, P. (2021). Informativni izračun kot pravni presadek: od dohodnine do socialnih pravic [Information Calculation as a Legal Transplant: from Personal Income Tax to Social Rights]. Podjetje in delo, 47(1), 19–39.
- Barnes, J. (2010). Towards a Third Generation ofAdministrative Procedure. In S. Rose-Ackerman &P. L. Lindseth (Eds.) ComparatiνeAdministratiνe Law, (pp. 336−356). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808101.00030
- Dragos, C. D., Kovač, P., &Tolsma H. D. (eds) (2020). The Sound of Silence in European Administratiνe Law. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Drechsler, W. (2022). Public Administration Studies: The Digital Trajectory. Transylνanian Reνiew of Administratiνe Sciences, 18(SI), 40–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2022.4
- Đanič Čeko, A., &Tomekovič, Ž. (2021). Odbrana posebna upravna postupanja u području socijalne skrbi u izvanrednima okolnostima izazvanim Covid-19 [Defence of special administrative conduct in the field of social care in the extraordinary circumstances of Covid-19]. Zbornik međunarodne konferencije Razνojjaνneupraνe. University “Lavoslav Ružička” 93–106. https://www.vevu.hr/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Zbornik-radov_11.‐konf.-RJU-2021_final_.pdf
- Ferraz, O. L. M. (2021). Covid‐19 and Inequality: The Importance of Social Rights. King’s LawJournal, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1885329
- Galetta, D., Hofmann, H., Puigpelat, O. M., & Ziller, J. (2015). The general principles of EU administratiνe procedural law. European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.2861/663904
- Goossens, J, Leenknegt, G-J., van Oirsouw, C., &van Vugt, E. (2021). The Netherlands: 2020 global review of constitutional law. In R. Albert, D. Landau, P. Faraguna, & S. Drugda (Eds.). The I.CONnect‐Clough Center 2020 global reνiew of constitutional law (pp. 202−206). Clough Center for the Study of Constitutional Democracy
- Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2014). Process and Procedures in EU administration. Hart Publishing.
- Hintea, C. E., Klun, M., & Nemec, J. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemics and Politics. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 15(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0001
- Hirsch, B., Schäfer, F., Aristovnik, A., Kovač, P., & Ravšelj, D. (2022). The impact of Digitalized Communication on the effectiveness of Local Administrative Authorities - Findings from Central European Countries in the COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Business Economics, 93(1-2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01106-8
- Hlongwane, P. (2020, September). The application of mixed methods research in public administration: opportunity missed or taken? The 5th Annual International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA). http://hdl.handle.net/10386/3223
- Horvat, M., Piątek, W., Potěšil, L., & Rozsnyai, K. F. (2021). Public Administration’s Adaptation to COVID-19 Pandemic - Czech, Hungarian, Polish and Slovak Experience. Central European Public Administration Review, 19(1), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2021.1.06
- Huysman, M. (2000). An organizational learning approach to the learning organization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200397905
- Jerovšek, T., & Kovač, P. (2008). Posebni upravni postopki [Special Administrative Procedures]. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public Administration.
- Kekez, A. (2018). Public Service Reforms and Clientelism: Explaining Variation of Service Delivery Modes in Croatian Social Policy. Policy and Society, 37(3), 386404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1436505
- Kogovšek Šalamon, N. (2019). Upravno pravo, ranljive skupine in clovekove pravice [Administrative Law, Vulnerable Groups and Human Rights], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.
- Kovač, P. (2021). Debureaucratization limits in administrative procedures codification: Lessons from Slovenia. Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010001
- Kovač, P. (2016). The requirements and limits of the codification of administrative procedures in Slovenia according to European trends. Review of Central and East European Law, 41(3/4), 427-61. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04103007
- Kovač, P., & Kerševan, E. (eds). (2020). Zakon o splosnem upravnem postopku s komentarjem [GAPA Commentary], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Faculty of Law.
- Kovač, P., & Remic, M. (2012). Pravna in socialna varnost uveljavljanja pravic izjavnih sredstev [Legal and social certainty of excising rights from public funds]. In P. Pevcin (ed.), Razumen in razumljen jaνni sector [Understandable and Reasonable Public Sector]. Faculty of Public Administration, 1–12.
- Kovač, P., Remic, M., & Sever, T. (2015). Upraνno‐procesne dileme o rabi ZUP 3 ν posebnih upraνnih postopkih [Administratiνe-legal Dilemmas o Usage of GAPA 3 in Special Administratiνe Procedures]. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.
- Kuhlmann, S., Hellström, M., Ramberg, U., & Reiter, R. (2021). Tracing divergence in crisis governance: responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared. International Reνiew of Administratiνe Sciences, 87(3), 556–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320979359
- Liao, Y. (2018). Toward a pragmatic model of public responsiveness: Implications for enhancing public administrators’ responsiveness to citizen demands. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1256305
- Mele, V., & Belardinelli, P. (2018). Mixed Methods in Public Administration Research: Selecting, Sequencing, and Connecting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy046
- Nemec, J., Drechsler, W., & Hajnal, G. (2020d). Public policy during COVID-19: Challenges for public administration and policy research in Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0011
- OECD (2017). The Principles of Public Administration. http://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/principles-public-administration.htm
- Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia (Varuh čloνekoνih praνic) . (2021). Annual Report for 2020. https://www.varuh-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/1p/Letno_porocilo_VCP_2020.pdf
- Ranchordas, S. (2022). Empathy in the digital administrative state. Duke Law Journal, 71 (6), 1341-1389. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol71/iss6/4
- Rose-Ackerman, S., & Lindseth, P. (2010). Comparatiνe administratiνe law. Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808101
- Sever, T., Đanič Čeko, A., & Kovač, P. (2016). Effective Legal Protection against the Excessive Length of Administrative Decision-Making: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia. Nispacee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(1), 135-166. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0007
- Stare, J„ & Pečarič, M. (eds). (2021). Science of Public Administration. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public Administration.
- Stare, J. & Klun, M. (2016). An analysis of the ethics infrastructure and ethical climate in Slovenian Public Administration. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0018
- Van Bruxvoort, X., & Van Keulen, M. (2021). Framework for Assessing Ethical Aspects of Algorithms and Their Encompassing Socio-Technical System. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11187. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311187
- Venice Commission, Council of Europe (2011). Study no. 470 / 2008, CDL-AD (2011) 009, Stocktaking on the Notions of “Good Governance” and “Good Administration”. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)009-e
- Werkman, R. A. (2009). Understanding failure to change: a pluralistic approach and five patterns. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(7), 664-684. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730910991673
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 32
Published on: Jun 11, 2023
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Matej Babšek, Polonca Kovač, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.