Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Effectiveness of Administrative Appeal in Slovenia and Croatia – Between National Traditions and EU Standards

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Auby, J.-B. (ed.). (2014). Codification of Administrative Procedure. Bruylant.
  2. Avbelj., M. (ed.). (2019). Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije [Commentary to the Constitution of Republic of Slovenia]. New University, Nova Gorica, European Law Faculty.
  3. Dragos, D. C., & Neamtu, B. (eds). (2014). Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Springer.
  4. Đanić Čeko, A., & Kovač, P. (2020). Comparative Analysis of an Administrative Appeal in Croatian, Slovenian and EU law. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 4, 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.25234/-eclic/11940
  5. Galetta, D.-U., Hofmann, H. C. H., Puigpelat, M. O, & Ziller, J. (2015). The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. European Parliament.
  6. Codec, R. (ed.). (1993). Upravni zbornik [Administrative Compendium], Institute of Public Administration at the Ljubljana Faculty of Law.
  7. Gruden, B., Kovač, P., & Stare, J. (2008). The Management of Complaints in Slovene Public Administration. Organization, 41(1), 22–29.
  8. Hofmann, H. C. H., Schneider, J.-P., & Ziller, J. (eds). (2014). The ReNEUAL Model Rules. ReNEUAL. www.reneual.eu.
  9. Janderová, J. (2019). Impact of the Rule of Law as a Fundamental Public Governance Principle on Administrative Law Interpretation in the Czech Republic. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/-10.17573/cepar.2019.2.06
  10. Kekez, A. (2018). Public Service Reforms and Clientelism: Explaining Variation of Service Delivery Modes in Croatian Social Policy. Policy and Society, 37 (3), 386-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1436505
  11. Kerševan, E. (2016). The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law in Slovenia. In Z. Szente (ed.), The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law: A European comparison (pp. 266–280). Routledge.
  12. Khadzhyradieva, S., Slukhai, S., & Rachynskyi, A. (2020). Public Administration in Ukraine: Adjusting to European Standards. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13 (1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0004
  13. Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T., & Skidmore, P. (2000). The Future of Remedies in Europe. Hart.
  14. Koprić, I. (2005). Administrative Procedures on the Territory of Former Yugoslavia. OECD.
  15. Koprić, I., & Đulabić, V. (eds). (2009). Modernizacija općeg upravnog postupka i javne uprave u Hrvatskoj [Modernisation of General Administrative Procedure and Public Administration]. Institute of Public Administration, Zagreb.
  16. Koprić, I., Kovač, P., Đulabić, V., & Džinić, J. (2016). Legal Remedies in Administrative Procedures in Western Balkans. Regional School of Public Administration.
  17. Kovač, P. (2013). Effective Adjudication through Administrative Appeals in Slovenia. Utrecht Law Review, 9(3), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.235
  18. Kovač, P. (2019). Pomen in posledice molka organa pri odločanju v upravnih zadevah [Significance and Effects of Administrative Silence in Administrative Matters]. Podjetje in delo, 45(617), 914–929.
  19. Kovač, P., & Kerševan, E. (eds). (2020). Komentar Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku (ZUP), 1. In 2. knjiga [Commentary to the ZUP, Books 1 and 2], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.
  20. Moldovan, O., & Bucatariu, G. (2019). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Administrative Appeal Procedures: A Case Study on Tax Disputes in Romania. Central European Public Administration Review, 17 (2), 9–33. https://doi.org/-10.17573/cepar.2019.2.01
  21. Pusić, E. (1989). Društvena regulacija: granice znanosti i izkustva [Societal Regulation: Limits of Science and Experience]. Globus, Faculty of Law.
  22. Randma-Liiv, T., & Drechsler, W. (2017). Three Decades, Four Phases: Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989–2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6–7), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0175
  23. Ropret, M., Aristovnik, A., & Kovač, P. (2018). A Content Analysis of the Rule of Law within Public Governance Models: Old vs. New EU Member States. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11 (2), 129–152. https://doi.org/-10.2478/nispa-2018-0016
  24. Rose-Ackerman, S., & Lindseth, P. L. (eds). (2010). Comparative Administrative Law. Elgar.
  25. Schuppert, G. F. (2000). Verwaltungswissenschaft (Verwaltung, Verwaltungsrecht, Verwaltungslehre). Nomos.
  26. Sever, T., Đanić Čeko, A., & Kovač, P. (2016). Effective legal protection against the excessive length of administrative decision-making: The cases of Slovenia and Croatia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(1), 135–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0007
  27. Trondal, J., & Peters, G. B. (2013). The Rise of European Administrative Space: Lessons Learned. Journal of European Public Policy, 20 (2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.746131
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 60
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Polonca Kovač, Urška Ribič, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.