Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unanticipated Consequences of Reforms in School Governance Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Adnett, N. and P. Davies. 2000. “Competition and Curriculum Diversity in Local Schooling Markets: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Education Policy 15(2), 157 – 167.10.1080/026809300285872
  2. Altrichter, H., M. Heinrich and K. Soukup-Altrichter. 2014. “School Decentralization as a Process of Differentiation, Hierarchization and Selection.” Journal of Education Policy 29(5), 675 – 699.10.1080/02680939.2013.873954
  3. Andrews, C. W., & Vries, M. S. D. (2012). Pobreza e municipalização da educação: análise dos resultados do IDEB (2005 – 2009). Cadernos de pesquisa, 42, 826 – 847.10.1590/S0100-15742012000300010
  4. Auerbach, J. S. 1983. Justice without Law. New York. Oxford University Press.
  5. Benson, J. K. (1982) ‘A Framework for Policy Analysis’ in D. L. Rogers and D. A. Whetten (eds) Interorganizational Coordination: Theory, Research, and Implementation, Ames, IO: Iowa State University Press.
  6. Berger, P. 1963. Invitation to sociology. New York: Doubleday.
  7. Bernhard, B. J. and F. W. Preston. 2004. “On the Shoulders of Merton: Potentially Sobering Consequences of Problem Gambling Policy.” American Behavioral Scientist 47(11), 1395 – 1405.10.1177/0002764204265340
  8. Boudon, R. 2016. The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. London. Springer.
  9. Brauckmann, S. and A. Schwarz. 2014. “Autonomous Leadership and a Centralised School System.” International Journal of Educational Management 28(7), 823 – 841.10.1108/IJEM-08-2013-0124
  10. Chouvy, P. A. 2013. “A Typology of the Unintended Consequences of Drug Crop reduction.” Journal of Drug Issues 43(2), 216 – 230.10.1177/0022042612467989
  11. Christ, C. and M. Dobbins. 2016. “Increasing School Autonomy in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis of its Causes and Forms.” European Societies 18(4), 359 – 388.10.1080/14616696.2016.1172716
  12. Cook, D. T. 2007. “School Based Management: A Concept of Modest Entitivity with Modest Result.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 20(3 – 4), 129 – 145.10.1007/s11092-007-9049-0
  13. De Vries, M. S. 2000. “The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 38, 193 – 224.10.1111/1475-6765.00532
  14. De Vries, M. S. 2016. Calculated choices in policy-making: the theory and practice of impact assessment. London: Springer.
  15. Edelman, M. 1967. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL.: University of Illinois Press.
  16. European Commission. 2012. “Supporting the Teaching Professions for Better Learning Outcomes.” Commission staff working document accompanying the document “Communication from the Commission Rethinking Education: Investing in Skills for Better Socio-Economic Outcomes.” Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0374:FIN:EN:PDF (last accessed 12-06-2018).
  17. Eurydice. 2007. School Autonomy in Europe: Policies and Measures. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit, European Commission.
  18. Eurydice. 2019. Administration and Governance at Central and / or Regional Level. National Education Systems. Eurydice. Available at https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/organisation-and-governance-44_en (last accessed 01-03-2021).
  19. Eurydice. 2021. Lithuania Overview. National Education Systems. Eurydice. Available at https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/lithuania_en (last accessed 20-03-2021).
  20. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
  21. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of management review, 24(2), 191 – 205.10.5465/amr.1999.1893928
  22. Fullan, M. 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change. London: Cassell.
  23. Glatter, R. 2012. “Persistent Preoccupations: The Rise and Rise of School Autonomy and Accountability in England.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 40(5), 559 – 575.10.1177/1741143212451171
  24. Hanushek, E. A., S. Link and L. Woessmann. 2013. “Does School Autonomy Make Sense everywhere ? Panel Estimates from PISA.” Journal of Development Economics 104 (September), 212 – 232.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002
  25. Howard, M. 2006. “The Law of Unintended Consequences.” S. Ill. ULJ 31, 451.
  26. Karlsen, G. E. 2000. “Decentralized Centralism; Framework for a Better Understanding of Governance in the Field of Education.” Journal of Educational Policy 15(50), 525 – 538.10.1080/026809300750001676
  27. Keddie, A. 2015. “School Autonomy, Accountability and Collaboration: A Critical Review.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 47(1), 1 – 17.10.1080/00220620.2015.974146
  28. Knill, C., & Tosun, J. 2012. Public policy: A new introduction. London: Palgrave.10.1007/978-1-137-00800-8
  29. Levin, B. and M. Fullan. 2008. “Learning about System Renewal.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36(1), 289 – 303.10.1177/1741143207087778
  30. Lithuanian Official Statistics Portal. 2020. Statistical Yearbook of Lithuania: Education. Available at https://osp.stat.gov.lt/ (last accessed 20-03-2021).
  31. Lithuanian Trade Union of Heads of Educational Institutions. 2021. Internal working document with the results from the survey of Lithuanian school leaders.
  32. Lowi, T. J. 1972. Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298 – 310.10.2307/974990
  33. Maroy, C. 2008. The new regulation forms of educational systems in Europe: towards a post-bureaucratic regime. In N. C. Soguel and P. Jaccard (eds.). Governance and Performance of Education Systems. Springer Netherlands 13 – 33.10.1007/978-1-4020-6446-3_2
  34. Merton, R. K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1(6), 894 – 904.10.2307/2084615
  35. Merton, R. K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
  36. Merton, R. K., & Merton, R. C. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  37. Nowosad, I. 2008. Autonomia szkoly publicznej w Niemczech. Poszukiwania – konteksty – uwarunkowania. Zielona Gora: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogorskiego.
  38. OECD. 1995. Decision-Making in 14 OECD Education Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  39. OECD. 2011. School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to student performance ? PISA in Focus. Special Edition of Education Policy 9. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k9h362kcx9wen.pdf?expires=1632989453&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=122BE76FF0FB-227213D2AA605B2E3E3C (last accessed 17-09-2020).
  40. OECD. 2017. Education in Lithuania: Reviews of National Policies for Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  41. OECD. 2018. PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  42. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  43. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  44. Page, E. C. 1991. Localism and Centralism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198277279.001.0001
  45. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198295969.001.0001
  46. Preston, F. W. and R. I. Roots. 2004. “Introduction: Law and its Unintended Consequences.” American Behavioral Scientist 47(11), 1371 – 1375.10.1177/0002764204265338
  47. Ritzer, G. 2000. Modern sociological theory (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  48. Rondinelli, D. A. and G. S. Cheema. 1983. “Implementing Decentralization Policies.” In G. S. Cheema and D. A. Rondinelli (eds). Decentralization and Development. London: Sage, 9 – 34.
  49. ŠMSM. 2019a. Bendrųjų programų atnaujinimo gaires, patvirtintos Lietuvos Respublikos švietimo, mokslo ir sporto ministro 2019 m. lapkričio 18 d. įsakymu Nr. V-1317 [Guidelines for the renewal of general education curricula, approved by the Minister of Education, Science and Sports of the Republic of Lithuania in 2019. November 18 by order no. V-1317].
  50. ŠMSM. 2019b. LIETUVA. Švietimas šalyje ir regionuose 2019. Mokinių pasiekimų atotrūkis. [LITHUANIA. Education in the country and regions 2019. Student achievement gap]. Vilnius: UAB INDIGO print.
  51. ŠMSM. 2020. LIETUVA. Švietimas šalyje ir regionuose 2020. Finansavimas. [LITHUANIA. Education in the country and regions 2020. Funding]. Vilnius: UAB Lietuvis.
  52. Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto players: How political institutions work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831456
  53. Turner, D. 2004. “Privatisation, Decentralization and Education in the United Kingdom: The Role of the State.” International Review of Education 50(3 / 4), 347 – 357.10.1007/s11159-004-2627-1
  54. Urbanovič, J. and J. Navickaitė. 2016. Lyderystė autonomiškoje mokykloje [Leadership in Autonomous Schools]. Vilnius: MRU.
  55. Urbanovič, J., J. Navickaite and R. Daciulyte. 2019. “Autonomy, Collaboration and Competition: The Impact of Education Management Reforms which Aim to Increase School Autonomy on Relations between Schools.” NISPAceeJournal of Public Administration and Policy 12(1), 175 – 197.10.2478/nispa-2019-0008
  56. Vaitiekūnas, V., D. Sujetaitė and S. Grigaitė-Mockevičienė. 2020. Lietuvos regionų būklė ir savivaldybių savarankiškumo apimtis: esamos situacijos analizė [The state of Lithuanian regions and the extent of municipal autonomy: an analysis of the current situation]. Vilnius: Kurk Lietuvai projekto medžiaga.
  57. Vedung, E. 2010. Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation, 16(3), 263 – 277.10.1177/1356389010372452
  58. Walsh, C. E. 1996. Education Reform and Social Change: Multicultural Voices, Struggles, and Visions. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
  59. Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy. New York. Basic Books.
  60. Woessmann, L., E. Ludemann, G. Schutz and M. R. West. 2007. “School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Level of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003.” Education Working Papers 13, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
  61. Zajda, J. 2006. “Decentralization and Privatization in Education: The Role of the State.” In J. Zajda (ed.). Decentralization and Privatization in Education: The Role of the State. Dordrecht: Springer 3 – 27.10.1007/978-1-4020-3358-2_1
  62. Želvys, R. 2002. “Švietimo reforma decentralizacijos / centralizacijos požiūriu.” In R. Bruzgelevičienė et al. (eds). Tarp dviejų pradžių: Bandymas kurti regiono švietimo politiką. Vilnius: Knygiai, 23 – 28).
Language: English
Page range: 273 - 298
Published on: Dec 2, 2021
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Jolanta Urbanovič, Michiel S. de Vries, Barbara Stankevič, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.