Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Questioning the Real Citizen-Centricity of e-Government Development: Digitalization of G2C Services in Selected CEE Countries Cover

Questioning the Real Citizen-Centricity of e-Government Development: Digitalization of G2C Services in Selected CEE Countries

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Volume 13 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)
By: David Špaček,  Mihály Csótó and  Nicolae Urs  
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Almuftah, H., V. Weerakkody and U. Sivarajah. 2016. “Comparing and Contrasting e-Government Maturity Models: A Qualitative-Meta Syhntesis.” In Electronic Government and Electronic Participation. Available at https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/13415/1/Fulltext.pdf (last accessed 12 April 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Andersen, K. V. and H. Z. Henriksen. 2006. “E-Government Maturity Models: Extension of the Layne and Lee Model.” Government Information Quarterly 23, 236 – 248.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Aranyossy, M. 2018. “Citizen Adoption of e-Government Services: Evidence from Hungary.” Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325769045_Citizen_adoption_of_e-government_services_-_Evidence_from_Hungary (last accessed 8 August 2019).10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Borovitz, T., M. Csótó, L. Juhász, S. Molnár, A. Rab and L. Székely. 2007. “Elektronikus Közigazgatás Éves Jelentés 2006” [Annual report on e-government services 2006]. Információs Társadalom 7(1), 61 – 85.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Brown, D. 2005. “Electronic Government and Public Administration.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 71(2), 241 – 254.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Budai, B., B. Gerencsér and B. Veszprémi. 2018. A digitális kor hazai közigazgatási specifikumai. Budapest: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Chen, Y. Ch. 2010. “Citizen-Centric E-Government Services: Understanding Integrated Citizen Service Information Systems.” Social Science Computer Review 28(4), 427 – 442.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Csótó, M. 2019a. “Mérni annyi, mint tudni ? Az elektronikus közigazgatás közösségi mérőszámairól.” Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review 50(2), 14 – 31.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Csótó, M. 2019b. “Examining the Role of the Knowledge Gap as a Driver towards e-Government Service Adoption.” In A. Nemeslaki et al. (eds). Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2019. Wien: Austrian Computer Society, 45 – 56.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. European Commission. 2001. Summary Report – Web-based Survey on Electronic Public Services (Results of the first measurement: October 2001).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. European Commission. 2018. E-Government in Romania. Luxembourg: Wavestone Luxembourg.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. European Commission. 2019. Digital Government Factsheet 2019 Hungary. Available at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Digital_Government_Factsheets_Hungary_2019.pdf (last accessed 15 August 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Fath-Allah, A., L. Cheikhi, R. E. Al-Qutaish and A. Idri. 2014. “E-Government Maturity Models: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 5(3), 71 – 91.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Garson, G. D. 2006. Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. London: Jones and Barlett.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Gil-Garcia, J. R., S. S. Dawes and T. Pardo. 2018. “Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads.” Public Management Review 20(5), 633 – 646.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Hajnal, G., K. Kádár and E. Kovács. 2018. “Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Hungary.” In N. Thijs et al. Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28. Available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ae181e42-9601-11e8-8bc1-01aa75ed71a1 (last accessed 8 August 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Heeks, R. 2006. Implementing and Managing eGovernment. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446220191
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Homburg, V. 2008. Understanding E-Government: Information Systems in Public Administration. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203885642
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Ifinedo, P. and M. Singh. 2011. “Determinants of eGovernment Maturity in the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Electronic Journal of e-Government 9(2), 166 – 182.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Janowski, T. 2015. “Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization.” Government Information Quarterly 32, 221 – 236.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Laposa, T. 2017. “The Digital Transformation of EU-Cohesion Policy: How to Measure the Matury of e-Cohesion Services.” Paper prepared for the NISPAcee 2017 conference.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Layne, K. and J. Lee. 2001. “Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model.” Government Information Quarterly 18, 122 – 136.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Lee, J. 2010. “10 Year Retrospect on Stage Models of e-Government: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.” Government Information Quarterly 27, 220 – 230.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. van der Linden, N., A. Groeneveld, G. Cattaneo, S. Aguzzi and F. Pallaro. 2017. “eGovernment Benchmark Framework 2012 – 2017.” Method Paper for the benchmarking exercises (comprehensive rules from 2012 to 2017). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=55174 (last accessed 5 November 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Luna-Reyes, L. F., J. R. Gil-Garcia and G. Romero. 2012. “Towards a Multidimensional Model for Evaluating Electronic Government: Proposing a More Comprehensive and Integrative Perspective.” Government Information Quarterly 29, 324 – 334.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Luna-Reyes, L. F., R. Sandoval-Almazan, G. Puron-Cid, S. Picazo-Vela, D. E. Luna and J. R. Gil-Garcia. 2017. “Understanding Public Value Creation in the Delivery of Electronic Services.” In M. Janssen, K. Axelsson, O. Glasey, B. Klievink, R. Krimmer, I. Lindgren, P. Parycek, H. J. Scholl and D. Trutnev (eds). Electronic Government. Berlin: Springer, 378 – 385.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Madsen, Ch. Ø., J. B. Berger and M. Phythian. 2014. “The Development in Leading e-Government Articles 2001 – 2010: Definitions, Perspectives, Scope, Research Philosophies, Methods and Recommendations: An Update of Heeks and Bailur.” In M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer and F. Bannister (eds). Electronic Government. Berlin: Springer, 17 – 34.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Meyerhoff Nielsen, M. 2017. “Citizen Use of Government eServices: Comparing Use, Governance and Cooperation Models in Estonia and Georgia.” Paper prepared for the NISPAcee 2017 conference.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Ministry of Interior, Deputy State Secretary for Information Technology. 2018. “Elektronikus közszolgáltatásokat és ügyfélszolgálati tevékenységet összefoglaló monitoring jelentés.” Available at https://nyilvantarto.hu/letoltes/statisztikak/2018_evi_adatokat_tartalmazo_monitoring_jelentes.pdf (last accessed 9 October 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Moon, M. J., J. Lee and Ch. Y. Roh. 2014. “The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and e-Government Studies in Public Administration: Research Themes and Methods.” Administration & Society 46(1), 3 – 36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Müller, S. D. and S. Skau. 2015. “Success Factors Influencing Implementation of E-Government at Different Stages of Maturity: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Electronic Governance 7(2), 136.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Nicoară, A. 2018. România digital – Istoric. Lecții învățate. Opțiuni de viitor. România digital: Concepte și instrumente operaționale. București: Editura Club România.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. OECD. 2009. “Rethinking e-Government Services: User-Centred Approach.” Available at http://www.oecd.org/document/7/0,3343,en_2649_34129_43864647_1_1_1_1,00.html (last accessed 16 December 2009).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Orbán, A. 2019. “The New Customisable Electronic Administration User Interface in Hungary.” In A. Nemeslaki et al. Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2019. Wien: Austrian Computer Society, 83 – 95.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Pásztor, M. Z. and A. Popovics. 2015. “Use of e-Government Services in Relation to Internet Use and Coverage.” Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279061310_USE_OF_EGOVERNMENT_SERVICES_IN_RELATION_TO_INTERNET_USE_AND_COVERAGE/link/5589ac2208ae4e384e25fe61/download (last accessed 8 August 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Rana, N. P., Y. K. Dwivedi and M. D. Williams. 2013. “Analysing Challenges, Barriers and CSF of eGov Adoption.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 7(2), 177 – 198.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Randma-Liiv, T. 2008. “New Public Management Versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1(2), 69 – 82.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Rose, W. R. and G. G. Grant. 2010. “Critical Issues Pertaining to the Planning and Implementation of E-Government Initiatives.” Government Information Quarterly 27, 26 – 33.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Șandor, S. D. 2012. “ICT and Public Administration.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 36E, 155 – 164.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Schuppan, T. 2009. “E-Government in Developing Countries: Experiences from Sub-Saharan Africa.” Government Information Quarterly 26(2009), 118 – 127.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Snead, J. and E. Wright. 2014. “E-Government Research in the United States.” Government Information Quarterly 31, 129 – 136.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Špaček, D. 2015. “E-Government Policy and its Implementation in the Czech Republic: Selected Shortcomings.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 9(1), 78 – 100.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Špaček, D. 2018. Strategy formulation in a large city – the case of Brno 2050 Strategy. Working Paper prepared for the 2018 IRSPM conference, 11. – 13. 4. 2018, Edinburg, UK, not published.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Špaček, D. 2019. Public Administration Characteristics in the Czech Republic. Draft report prepared within the EUPACK2 project and finalized in March 2019, not published.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Stamule, T. 2018. “Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Hungary.” In N. Thijs et al. (eds). Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28. Available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/90311e18-95fe-11e8-8bc1-01aa75ed71a1 (last accessed 8 August 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Tinholt, D. et al. 2017. eGovernment Benchmark 2017: Taking Stock of User-Centric Design and Delivery of Digital Public Services in Europe. Final Background Report: Volume 2. Available at https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017-egovernment-benchmark_background_v7.pdf (last accessed 10 April 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Tinholt, D. et al. 2018. eGovernment Benchmark 2018: Securing eGovernment for all. Background Report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=55487 (last accessed 12 April 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Tsonev, I. et al. 2016. “Re-Designing Public Services for the 21st Century: Comparative Analysis of the e-Reforms in Estonia, Bulgaria, and Romania.” Available at https://www.liberalforum.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Redesigning_public_services_ENG_FINAL.pdf (last accessed 8 August 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Twizeyimana, J. D. and A. Andersson. 2019. “The Public Value of E-Government: A Literature Review.” Government Information Quarterly 36, 167 – 178.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. United Nations. 2018. E-Government Survey. Available at https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018 (last accessed 12 April 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Urs, N. 2018. “E-Government Development in Romanian Local Municipalities: A Complicated Story of Success and Hardships.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 55(E /2018), 118 – 129.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Yildiz, M. 2007. “E-Government Research: Reviewing the Literature, Limitations, and Ways forward.” Government Information Quarterly 24, 646 – 665.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Zahran, I., H. Al-Nuaim, M. Rutter and D. Benyon. 2015. “A Critical Analysis of e-Government Evaluation Models at National and Local Municipal Levels.” The Electronic Journal of e-Government Volume 13(1), 28 – 42.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Zhang, H., X. Xu and J. Xiao. 2014. “Diffusion of e-Government: A Literature Review and Directions for Future Directions.” Government Information Quarterly 31, 631 – 636.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Zhao, F., K. N. Shen and A. Collier. 2014. “Effects of National Culture on e-Government Diffusion: A Global Study of 55 Countries.” Information & Management 51, 1005 – 1016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 213 - 243
Published on: Jun 2, 2020
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
digitalization of core services,
e-government comparisons
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Political science,
Local government and administration

© 2020 David Špaček, Mihály Csótó, Nicolae Urs, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 13 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)Next article