References
- AAM Consulting. 2012. The Evaluation of Regulatory Contraints. National Development Agency / Prime Minister’s Office. Available at https://www.palyazat.gov.hu/szabalyozasi_kotottsegek_ertekelese.
- Koedijk, M. (2016). EU cohesion policy and accountability coverage, context, content and costs in the case of ERDF in the Netherlands. Enschede: Universiteit Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.978903654026110.3990/1.9789036540261
- Davies, S. 2015. Is Simplification Simply a Fiction ? IQ-Net Thematic Paper 37(2); European Policies Research Centre School of Government & Public Policy University of Strathclyde.
- Davies, S and L. Polverari. 2011. “Financial Accountability and European Union Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies 45(5):695-706 DOI:10.1080 / 00343404.2010.52911810.1080/00343404.2010.529118
- Dragan, G. 2008. “Who’s Afraid of the Absorption Capacity ? A Romanian Perspective.” Presented at 48th ERSA Congress, 27 – 31 August 2008, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
- Grazianoa, P. and C. Halpern. 2015. EU Governance in Times of Crisis: Inclusiveness and Effectiveness beyond the ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ law divide. Comparative European Politics DOI:10.1057 / cep.2015.610.1057/cep.2015.6
- Hajdu, Sz., Zs. Kondor, K. Kondrik, M. Miklós-Molnár, G. Nyikos, G. Sódar 2017. “Kohéziós Politika 2014 – 2020” Budapest, Magyarország: Dialóg Campus Kiadó, 614 p.
- Hoffman I. 2018 “Bevezetés a területfejlesztési jogba”. Negyedik kiadás, Budapest ELTE EöTvös kiadó, 150p.
- Horvat, A. 2005. “Why does Nobody Care About the Absorption ?” WIFO Work-ingPaper 258 / 2005.
- Horvat, A. and G. Maier. 2004: Regional Development, Absorption Problems and the EU Structural Funds: Some Aspects Regarding Administrative Absorption Capacity in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, 44th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Regions and Fiscal Federalism”, 25th – 29th August 2004, Porto, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neu.
- Idczak, P. and I. Musiałkowska. 2014. “Assessment of the System of Project Selection under the Cohesion Policy: The Case of the Wielkopolska Region.” Evaluační teorie a praxe Ročník 2(2), 1 – 31.
- Jouen, I. 2008. Territorial Cohesion: From Theory to Practice Notre Europe. © Notre Europe, June 2008 1 – 31.
- Jurevičienė, I. and I. Pileckaitė. 2013. “The Impact of EU Structural Fund Support and Problems of its Absorption.” Business, Management and Education 11(1), 1 – 18.10.3846/bme.2013.01
- Kalman, J. 2002. “Possible Structural Funds Absorption Problems: The Political Economy View with Application to the Hungarian Regional Development Institutions and Financial System.” Budapest: Central European University.
- Kopeva, D., R. Laplana, B. Huatdidier, N. Turpine, L. Jelinek, M. Raley, M. Njavro and O. Baquiero. 2011. “The Role of Multilevel Governance for Multifunctional Land Use Activities.” IASC European meeting, 14 – 17 September 2011, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
- Łacny, J. 2017. “Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: The CJEU Case-Law on Financial Corrections Imposed by the Commission on the Member States.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 13(2), 1043 – 1054.
- Marque, A. 2011. “A New Appeals Board: Providing Consistency and Clarity in the World of Grants and Cooperative Agreements.” Public Contract Law Journal 41(1), 129 – 148.
- Mendez, C. and J. Bachtler. 2017. “Financial Compliance in the European Union: A Cross-National Assessment of Financial Correction Patterns and Causes in Cohesion Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55(3), 569 – 592.
- Meuleman, L. and A. Brenninkmeije. 2017. “How to Deal with Legal Uncertainty: Managing and Audit Authorities in Cohesion Policy.” European Structural and Investment Funds Journal Volume 5 (2017), Issue 2, 161 – 173.
- Mike, K. and G. Balás. 2015. “Measuring for Absorption: How the Institutionalisation of EU Cohesion Policy Influences the Use of Performance Indicators in Hungary.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 8(2), 125 – 147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0012.10.1515/nispa-2015-0012
- Nyikos, G. 2012. “Végrehajtási intézményrendszer a kohéziós politikában.” Polgári szemle: Gazdasági és társadalmi folyóirat 8(3 – 6), 140 – 164.
- Nyikos, G. 2013. “A közfinanszírozásból megvalósított fejlesztések hatásai, különös tekintettel az EU kohéziós politikára.” Pénzügyi szemle / Public Finance Quarterly 2, 165 – 185.
- Nyikos, G. 2014. “Development Policy in an Age of Austerity: Result-orientation, Effectiveness and Sustainability”. In I. Pálné Kovács and C. M. Profiroiu (eds). Regionalisation and Regional Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: Selected Revised Papers from the 21st NISPAcee Annual Conference, May 16 – 18, 2013 Belgrade, Serbia. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 165 – 188.
- Nyikos Gy 2011. “Területi tervezés és területi szempontok a fejlesztéspolitikában” FALU VÁROS RÉGIÓ 18: 2 pp. 35 – 41, 7 p.
- Nyikos, G. and Sz. Szabó 2019. “Irregularities in the EU Cohesion Policy – Hungarian Experiences and Lessons Learned.” European Mirror 2019 Budapest 67 – 85.
- Nyikos, G. and G. Soós. 2016. “Kohéziós politika és közbeszerzés együttes alkalmazásának lehetőségei és kihívásai az új szabályozás fényében.” Közbeszerzési szemle 5, 45 – 60.
- Nyikos, G. and G. Soós. 2018. “Financial Instruments in EU Cohesion Policy and Public Procurement: Challenges for the 2014 – 2020 Programming Period.” Public Procurement Law Review 32, 120 – 137.
- Nyikos, G. and G. Soós. 2019. “The Hungarian Experience of Using Cohesion Policy Funds and Prospects.” In Idczak, P. and I. Musiałkowska (ed.). EU Cohesion Policy in Eastern and Southern Europe: Taking Stock and Drawing Lessons for the Future. De Gruyter.
- Nyikos, G. and T. Tátrai. 2012. “Public Procurement and Cohesion Policy.” CP33 Competitive paper.
- Parker, C. 2000. Reducing the Risk of Policy Failure: Challenges for Regulatory Compliance. Paris: OECD.
- Šumpíková, M., J. Pavel, S. Klazar and O. Potluka. 2005. “European Union Funds: Absorption Capacity and Effectiveness of their Use, with Focus on the Regional Level in the Czech Republic.” In G. Jenei, A. Barabashev and F. van den Berg (eds). Instititutional Requirements and Problem Solving in the Public Administrations of the Enlarged European Union and Its Neighbours: Selected Papers from the 12th NISPAcee Annual Conference Vilnius, 2004. Bratislava: NISPAcee.
- Suwaj, P. J. 2005. “Preventing Corruption and Conflict of Interest: Necessity or Fashion ? The Case of Poland.” In G. Jenei, A. Barabashev and F. van den Berg (eds). Instititutional Requirements and Problem Solving in the Public Administrations of the Enlarged European Union and Its Neighbours: Selected Papers from the 12th NISPAcee Annual Conference Vilnius, 2004. Bratislava: NISPAcee.
- Talaga, R. and G. Nyikos. 2014. “Cohesion Policy in Transition: Comparative Aspects of the Polish and Hungarian Systems of Implementation.” Comparative Law Review (TORUN) 18, 111 – 139.
- Tátrai, T. and G. Nyikos. 2012. “The Uses and Abuses of Public Procurement in Hungary.” In G. L. Albano, K. F. Snider and K. V. Thai. Charting a Course in Public Procurement: Innovation and Knowledge Sharing. Boca Raton: (FL), Amerikai Egyesült Államok: Pracademics Press, (2013) pp. 29 – 54, 26 p.
- Triga, I., I. Vasiliki-Vadratsikas and I. Konstantinos. YEAR. “Framing of Cohesion Policy.” Available at http://www.cohesify.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Cohesify_ResearchPaper9_Framing1.pdf
- Walker, J. C. 1997. “Enforcing Grants and Cooperative Agreements as Contracts Under the Tucker Act.” Publich Contract Law Journal 26(4), 683 – 707. Availabe at http://www.jstor.org/stable/25754281
- Wostner, P. 2007. “The Micro-efficiency of EU Cohesion Policy.” European Policy Research Paper 64.