Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Level of Fiscal Autonomy: Evidence from Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina Cover

The Level of Fiscal Autonomy: Evidence from Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2013. Enumerated Persons, Households and Dwellings, Census-First Results. Sarajevo: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  2. Akai, N., Y. Nishimura and M. Sakata. 2007. “Complementarity, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth.” Economics of Governance 8(4), 339 – 362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-007-0032-5.10.1007/s10101-007-0032-5
  3. Aristovnik, A. 2012. “Fiscal Decentralization in Eastern Europe: Trends and Selected Issues.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 37 (E/October), 5 – 22.10.2139/ssrn.2187475
  4. Baskaran, T. and L. P. Feld. 2009. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is there a Relationship ?” CESIFO Working Paper 2721. Munich: CESifo Group.10.2139/ssrn.1441152
  5. Behnisch, A., T. Büttner and D. Stegarescu. 2003. “Public Sector Centralization and Productivity Growth: Reviewing the German Experience.” Discussion Paper 02 – 03. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.10.2139/ssrn.319324
  6. Blöchliger, H. and D. King. 2005. “Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governments.” OECD Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government Working Papers 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  7. Blöchliger, H. and J. Rebesone. 2009. “The Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-National Governments: An Update.” OECD Fiscal Network Working Papers 9. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  8. Boadway, R. 2001. “La necesidad de compartir los ingresos fiscales.” Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales 167, 103 – 110.
  9. Boyn, G. A. 1996. “Competition and Local Government: A Public Choice Perspective.” Urban Studies 33(4 – 5), 703 – 721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989650011799.10.1080/00420989650011799
  10. Bryson, P. J. 2010. Property Tax in Economies in Transition: Selected Case Studies. Bratislava: The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe (NISPACee) Press.
  11. Centre of Public Interest Advocacy – CPI Foundation. 2016. Analiza financija lokalne samouprave u BIH. Sarajevo: Fondacija Centar za zastupanje građanskih interesa.
  12. Chapman, J. I. 1999. “Local Government. Fiscal Autonomy and Fiscal Stress: The Case of California.” Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper 99JC1. Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  13. Clark, G. L. 1984. “A Theory of Local Autonomy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74(2), 195 – 352. https://doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01448.x.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01448.x
  14. Croatian Bureau of Statistics. 2011. Census of Population, Households and Dwellings. Zagreb: Croatian Bureau of Statistics.
  15. Darby, J., A. Muscatelli and R. Graeme. 2002. “Fiscal Federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from Other Industrialised Countries.” Available at, http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_22256_en.pdf (last accessed on 12 July 2016).
  16. De Vries, M. 2000. “The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 38(2), 193 – 224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00532.10.1111/1475-6765.00532
  17. Do Vale, H. F. 2015. “Comparing and Measuring Subnational Autonomy across Three Continents.” Lex Localis: Journal of Self-Government 13(3), 741 – 764. https://doi.org/10.4335/13.3.741-764(2015).10.4335/13.3.741-764(2015)
  18. Feld, L., G. Kirchgässner and C. A. Schaltegger. 2004. “Fiscal Federalism and Economic Performance: Evidence from Swiss Cantons.” Marburg Working Paper on Economics 20. Marburg: Philipps University at Marburg. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/29872.
  19. Fleurke, F. and R. Willemse. 2006. “Measuring Local Autonomy: A Decision-Making Approach.” Local Government Studies 32(1), 71 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930500453542.10.1080/03003930500453542
  20. Goldsmith, M. and E. C. Page. 2010. Changing Government Relations in Europe: From Localism to Intergovernmentalism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203858486
  21. Hooghe, L., G. Marks and A. H. Schakel. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 43 Democracies. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203852170
  22. Ivanyna, M. and A. Shah. 2012. “How Close is your Government to its People ? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper 6138. Washington D.C.: World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-6138
  23. Jones, G. and J. Stewart. 1983. The Case for Local Government. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  24. Jurlina Alibegović, D. 2010. “Innovative Municipal Development Financing. The Case of Three Croatian Cities.” In L. Ramirez and G. Kebede (eds). Strategic Planning for Local Development. Case Studies from Small and Mid-Sized European Cities. Belgrade and Budapest: Open Society Institute, 167 – 188.
  25. Jurlina Alibegović, D., S. Hodžić and E. Bečić. 2018. “Limited Fiscal Autonomy of Croatian Large Cities.” Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self Government 16(1), 107 – 128.10.4335/10.4335/16.1.107-128(2018)
  26. Karanikolas, P. and S. Hatzipantel. 2010. “The Decentralization Process of Development Policy in Greece.” European Planning Studies 18(3), 411 – 434.10.1080/09654310903497710
  27. Kim, J., J. Lotz and H. Blöchliger. 2013. “Measuring Fiscal Decentralization: Concepts and Policies.” Available at http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/governance/measuring-fiscal-decentralisation_9789264174849-en#page3 (last accessed on 14 July 2016).10.1787/9789264174849-en
  28. Ladner, A., N. Keuffer and H. Baldersheim. 2015. Local Autonomy Index for European Countries (1990 – 2014. Release 1.0. Brussels: European Commission.
  29. Lin, J. Y. and Z. Liu. 2000. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in China.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 49(1), 1 – 21.10.1086/452488
  30. Meloche, J-P., F. Vaillancourt and S. Yilmaz. 2004. “Decentralization or Fiscal Autonomy ? What Does Really Matter ? Effects on Growth and Public Sector Size in European Transition Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3254. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  31. Ministry of Finance of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Law on the Principles of Local Self-Government in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina no. 51 / 06.
  32. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Croatia. The Law on Local and Regional Self-Government. Official Gazette 33 / 01, 60 / 01, 129 / 05, 109 / 07, 125 / 08, 36 / 09, 150 / 11, 144 / 12, 19 / 13, 137 / 15.
  33. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Serbia. The Law on the Territorial Organization of the Republic of Serbia. Official Gazette 129 / 07.
  34. Ministry of Finance of the Republic Srpska. The Law on Local Self-Government of the Republic of Srpska. Official Gazette 42 / 05.
  35. Oates, W. E. 2005. “Toward A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism.” International Tax and Public Finance 12(4), 349 – 373.10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
  36. Page, E. C. and M. J. Goldsmith. 1987. Central and Local Government Relations: A Comparative Analysis of West European Unitary States. London: Sage Publications.
  37. Pierre, J. 1990. “Assessing Local Autonomy.” In D. King, S. King and J. Pierre (eds). Challenges to Local Government. London: Sage Publications, 37 – 54.
  38. Pratchett, L. 2004. “Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the ‘New Localism’.” Political Studies 52(2), 358 – 375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00484.x.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00484.x
  39. Prud’homme, R. 1981. “On the Dangers of Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper 1252. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  40. Sellers, J. M. and A. Lidström. 2007. “Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State.” Governance an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20(4), 609 – 632.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x
  41. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. 2011. Census of Population, Households and Dwellings. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
  42. Swianiewicz, P. 2014. “An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe.” Local Government Studies 40(2), 292 – 311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.807807.10.1080/03003930.2013.807807
  43. Thorton, J. 2007. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth Reconsidered.” Journal of Urban Economics 61(1), 64 – 70.10.1016/j.jue.2006.06.001
  44. Vetter, A. 2007. Local Politics: A Resource for Democracy in Western Europe ? Local Autonomy, Local Integrative Capacity, and Citizens’ Attitudes toward Politics. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
  45. Wolman, H. 2008. “Comparing Local Governments across Counties: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges to Building a Field of Comparative Local Government Studies.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26(1), 87 – 103.10.1068/cav5
  46. Wolman, H. and M. Goldsmith. 1990. “Local Autonomy as a Meaningful Analytic Concept. Comparing local government in the United States and in the United Kingdom.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 26(1), 3 – 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169002600101.10.1177/004208169002600101
  47. Wolman, H., R. McManmon, M. Bell and D. Brunori. 2008. “Comparing Local Government Autonomy Across States.” GWIPP Working Paper 35. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University.
  48. Zhang, T. and H. Zou. 1998. “Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending and Economic Growth in China.” Journal of Public Economics 67(2), 221 – 240.10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00057-1
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 112
Published on: Jun 18, 2019
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Dubravka Jurlina Alibegović, Sabina Hodžić, Emira Bečić, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.